Should but won't as they are not in comparable situations.
Seems a bit high. I think most fans were speculating in the $1.5M ballpark. Wilson didn't have arbitration rights, either. Not much negotiating leverage from Wilson's camp, and his stats don't really back up a $2M payday. This puts him in the same ballpark as a 2nd contracts for players like Sam Gagner, Patrik Berglund, and David Perron (all of which had 49+ point seasons on their resumes at the time of their 2nd deals).
You do realise that Gagne and Perron signed those in 2010 and Berglund in 2011? That's 5 and 6 years ago. Brandon Saad had 47 and 52 points seasons on his resume at the time of his 2nd deal, he got 6 million per year. Your point doesn't make any sense.
So it looks like we're giving him 2 years to develop into the Milan Lucic-type guy he was being described as.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcZy81gj3mI
Asked and received.
Wilson may not always appear on the score sheet but there should be little question he impacts the game. And anyone who thinks the Caps don't need a Tom Wilson needs to re-watch the Flyers series. If it wasn't Wilson taking those hits from Simmonds and Manning who would it have been? Ovi, Backstrom, Burakovsky, Kuznetsov? Having Wilson draws the attention of the other teams agitators and gets good players off their game and he plays the role to a tee. One of the reasons he was less effective against the Penguins is because they don't have that guy and after the Sheary and Maata incidents, the Caps were effectively neutered from even the appearance of impropriety and Wilson (and the rest of the Caps) had to take it down a notch. We have lots of playmakers and goalscorers but remove Wilson from the lineup and it's a group of skilled Euros and the Caps aren't good enough to be the old Red Wings so that formula isn't going to work.
That is a great video and man can that guy end a career. Not many players like that in the NHL anymore and you have to respect that.