Was prime Duncan Keith better than prime Scott Niedermayer? | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Was prime Duncan Keith better than prime Scott Niedermayer?

Was prime Duncan Keith better than prime Scott Niedermayer?

  • Yes

    Votes: 40 20.7%
  • No but he was equal to him

    Votes: 23 11.9%
  • No

    Votes: 121 62.7%
  • I didn't watch enough of prime Niedermayer to judge

    Votes: 9 4.7%

  • Total voters
    193

SeanMoneyHands

Registered User
Apr 18, 2019
13,596
18,296
He is at least equal IMO. Pure skating ability they were both elite. Keith in his prime was a machine for so many years on that Hawks Blueline.
 
It’s a pickem. With that said, Niedamyer scored almost 70 more goals reg season with the same gp. And Nieds spent most of his career with the trap devils. For that reason I’ll go with Nieds because he was more of a threat to score goals. Also had 100 more points to career. Keith was more ppg in playoffs, but again Nieds played with the trap devils.
 
Agree with the above that it’s basically a pick ‘em at their best. I think Niedermayer was a bit more creative offensively, Keith a bit better defensively. Though Nieds being the better goalscorer might be an advantage. Keith’s weak shot made him a less than ideal PP QB. Though Nieds wasn’t exactly Makar either
 
Keith was really good. He had some mean in him too. But Scott Neidermyer was on another level and (imo) ranked in a higher tier of great D.
 
Both of them are probably defensively overrated but Niedermayer was more skilled and dynamic offensively, even on the Devils who suppressed a lot of his creativity. He just had a knack for big moments.

Cool thing about both of them is that they could skate themselves out of trouble much of the time but easily play that energy-conserving first-pass style for 30 minutes as well.
 
It’s the Spiderman meme.

I’ll homer vote for Keith, but but aside from one being slightly better offensively and the other being slightly better defensively, they’re pretty much the same player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raccoon Jesus
It’s close, but I’d give the edge to Keith due to the fact that he brought pretty much everything Niedermayer did, but provided a bit of a nasty physical element on top at times, and had superior playoff production.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raccoon Jesus
I think Niedermeyer is a bit overrated but I have him as better than Keith. Just on pure defense I would probably go Keith but overall impact on the ice I would say Nieds.
 
Let me pose thos question another way to people:

Niedermayer was taken 3rd overall in '91, would anyone take Keith with one of thr top 3 picks in '02?
 
Let me pose thos question another way to people:

Niedermayer was taken 3rd overall in '91, would anyone take Keith with one of thr top 3 picks in '02?
In hindsight yes, he has second most points in his draft year as a dman, but I’d still prefer Scott.
 
How in the world did Niedermayer win that Conn Smythe?

Voters were punishing Pronger for his suspensions?

Nieds wasn't even the team's best defenceman on that run, let alone best player.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad