It wasn't a KO.There was a time when a KO like this would have got a lot of chatter.
Thats considered a KO in a hockey fight.It wasn't a KO.
He did clock him though, no doubt.
No. Colton Orr vs Todd Fedoruk is a KO.Thats considered a KO in a hockey fight.
You could say TKO whatever, but when you drop a guy it's considered a KO.
He actually beat the count, if the ref would have let them go again would have been only a knockdown ahhaahhahaNo. Colton Orr vs Todd Fedoruk is a KO.
Lauzon did not lose consciousness. This is a TKO.
No, it's definitely not.Thats considered a KO in a hockey fight.
You could say TKO whatever, but when you drop a guy it's considered a KO.
No, it is not. TKO stands for Technical Knock Out, which means you can't get back on your feet after the count count(8 or 10).No. Colton Orr vs Todd Fedoruk is a KO.
Lauzon did not lose consciousness. This is a TKO.
It was a TKO not a KO, end of story. If you had spent time on the Hockey Fights.com boards or Drop Your Gloves.com you would know the difference. Even your definition of TKO in regards to boxing is wrong as you're actually describing a KO. A TKO is when the referee stops the fight because he feels it's unsafe for the fighter to continue or in some fights there's a 3 knockdown rule that results in a TKO.No, it is not. TKO stands for Technical Knock Out, which means you can't get back on your feet after the count count(8 or 10).
In hockey there is no count, so the point is moot, but any punch that causes a guy to go down directly is...pretty damn good.
Lauzon did get up, but Pod's punches were straight rights that a boxer would've been proud of. Was surprised to see it.
There is more than one way to have a TKO, and it depends on whether you are boxing, or in some other combative sport such as Muay Thai, etc. That is a whole different conversation.It was a TKO not a KO, end of story. If you had spent time on the Hockey Fights.com boards or Drop Your Gloves.com you would know the difference. Even your definition of TKO in regards to boxing is wrong as you're actually describing a KO. A TKO is when the referee stops the fight because he feels it's unsafe for the fighter to continue or in some fights there's a 3 knockdown rule that results in a TKO.
Aaron Downey against Jesse BoulericeHardest punch I’ve seen in a long time in the NHL.
Any recent examples out there of a better one punch impact than what Podz landed?
A TKO in Muay Thai is the same as boxing. That definition you gave of a TKO isn't correct for any combat sport.There is more than one way to have a TKO, and it depends on whether you are boxing, or in some other combative sport such as Muay Thai, etc. That is a whole different conversation.
Bottom line is that hockey is not a combative sport, and there are no set definitions, or awards for fighting. The winner, and the loser, both get 5 minutes in the penalty box. No belt, no judges, or referees decisions.
Ovechkin/SvechHardest punch I’ve seen in a long time in the NHL.
Any recent examples out there of a better one punch impact than what Podz landed?
It’s a TKO. Any hockey enforcer will tell you the exact same thing.No, it is not. TKO stands for Technical Knock Out, which means you can't get back on your feet after the count count(8 or 10).
In hockey there is no count, so the point is moot, but any punch that causes a guy to go down directly is...pretty damn good.
Lauzon did get up, but Pod's punches were straight rights that a boxer would've been proud of. Was surprised to see it.