Friedman: Vancouver trying to trade Vincent Desharnais

Killer Orcas

Registered User
Jul 2, 2011
8,307
6,526
Abbotsford BC
The per year salary was fine the 2nd year was not. 3rd pairing guys are always available not sure why we needed to add second year on a player we didn't even know worked here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nucks88

Rowlet

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 13, 2018
4,657
5,575
To be fair, your GM has been working magic so I wouldn't be surprised. I was surprised he signed such a bad player that was a 7D on our team to such an awful contract to begin with though.

The team needed to add a D, and the coaching staff spoke to Desharnais beforehand and I guess thought they could help him along.

Evidently they couldn't, and he will end up a Penguin or Duck in a trade for Pettersson or Fowler.

Also, Allvin is definitely the best GM in the league at getting bad contracts off the books. Poolman, Kuzmenko, and Mikheyev for minimal cost.
 
Last edited:

Sergei Shirokov

Registered User
Jul 27, 2012
16,976
8,083
British Columbia
Never liked the signing. And he's already been surpassed by Juulsen/Freidman who we already had plus Brannstrom who was a thrown-in & on waivers.

That said, I do think Desharnais is a better player than what he's shown (atleast a bit) and he has been good on the penalty kill. He is legit good at that.

Maybe a team who needs PK help would consider him, or one of the teams who were bidding on him in the offseason.

Otherwise he's either apart of a bigger trade as a throw-in or were paying to dump him.
 

Peen

Rejoicing in a Benning-free world
Oct 6, 2013
31,808
28,255
stupid league w dinosaurs - team should absolutely pay to dump a 7D making $2MM but he's a righty and big and can PK and nice so they'll probably get out of this relatively scot free

cannot skate and cannot move the puck
 

pth2

Registered User
Jan 7, 2018
3,517
2,782
Nobody said that. We said your fan base being delusional as they usually are asking for a 1st wasn't worth it because we had a plug who did the same thing.
Get real. Given his injury history, no one expected to get much for Edmundson.
 

lawrence

Registered User
May 19, 2012
16,536
7,412
our coaching staff was able to kinda turn Myers and Julssen around. They banked on doing the same with Desharnais. unfortunate maybe it hasn't worked out. But who knows. You don't have to laugh at us f in hfboards. like a bunch of kids roaming around here.
 

AddyTheWrath

Registered User
Mar 24, 2015
11,446
20,172
Toronto
our coaching staff was able to kinda turn Myers and Julssen around. They banked on doing the same with Desharnais. unfortunate maybe it hasn't worked out. But who knows. You don't have to laugh at us f in hfboards. like a bunch of kids roaming around here.
Desharnais didn’t need to be “turned around”. He had a good year last year. You guys just don’t know how to utilize him I guess or make the best of his skillset
 

lawrence

Registered User
May 19, 2012
16,536
7,412
Desharnais didn’t need to be “turned around”. He had a good year last year. You guys just don’t know how to utilize him I guess or make the best of his skillset

get the most out of him. Or Friedman is just blowing smoke. Who knows.
 

WhatTheDuck

9 - 20 - 8
May 17, 2007
24,435
18,261
Worst Case, Ontario
Oh you mean Ceci and Desharnais weren't actually the pillars of the Oilers D? I see Edmonton is in the top 8 again this year in best goals against as they were last year under Knoblaugh. Big shock. Nurse is having a very nice bounce back season freed of pylons like Desharnais and Ceci.

Nope, turns out their pillars on D were the two D's in McDavid
 

blankall

Registered User
Jul 4, 2007
15,139
5,550
I'm sure there's a team out there that would take a chance on a big RHD that's cost controlled for next year who they can try and flip.

Or someone take him back as a cap dump.
Try and flip? If he was worth assets, the Canucks wouldn't be trading him. I don't think you get how this works.

Desharnais is looking like he is not an NHL quality player. That's not surprising given that his resume prior consisted solely of a season and a half in Edmonton.
 

blankall

Registered User
Jul 4, 2007
15,139
5,550
The team needed to add a D, and the coaching staff spoke to Desharnais beforehand and I guess thought they could help him along.

Evidently they couldn't, and he will end up a Penguin or Duck in a trade for Pettersson or Fowler.

Also, Allvin is definitely the best GM in the league at getting bad contracts off the books. Poolman, Kuzmenko, and Mikheyev for minimal cost.
Poolman had value because he was on LTIR and actually have the Avs more cap flexibility.

Kuzmenko was part of an awful Lindholm deal that saw the Canucks up a top prospect and a 1st.

Mikheyev, I'll give you. He had 31 points playing for the Canucks, and 28 in 46 the year before. So easier to move than Desharnais. The Canucks retained 15% and swapped a 2nd for a 4th. Still good assessment by the Canucks to identify that Mikheyev was not very good.
 

LemonSauceD

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 31, 2015
8,416
14,377
Vancouver
Allvin has made some iffy signings but his ability to cut loose on them has been nice to see (although Poolman signing was made by Benning).

Dumping Mikheyev, Poolman, Pearson, and Kuzmenko ($16M) for a 2027 2nd, 2 4th’s, a 3rd, DeSmith and Brannstrom.
 
Last edited:

TheNumber4

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
46,101
57,309
Poolman had value because he was on LTIR and actually have the Avs more cap flexibility.

Kuzmenko was part of an awful Lindholm deal that saw the Canucks up a top prospect and a 1st.

Mikheyev, I'll give you. He had 31 points playing for the Canucks, and 28 in 46 the year before. So easier to move than Desharnais. The Canucks retained 15% and swapped a 2nd for a 4th. Still good assessment by the Canucks to identify that Mikheyev was not very good.
I woundnt give too much credit for identifying Mikheyev sucked. They still dragged his useless ass and cap hit into the playoffs, where he hurt them. Then they paid to get rid of him. A decent cost to get rid of him, but not before he had already done damage.
 

LemonSauceD

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 31, 2015
8,416
14,377
Vancouver
Poolman had value because he was on LTIR and actually have the Avs more cap flexibility.

Kuzmenko was part of an awful Lindholm deal that saw the Canucks up a top prospect and a 1st.

Mikheyev, I'll give you. He had 31 points playing for the Canucks, and 28 in 46 the year before. So easier to move than Desharnais. The Canucks retained 15% and swapped a 2nd for a 4th. Still good assessment by the Canucks to identify that Mikheyev was not very good.
I wouldn’t call Brzustewicz a top prospect. He was a good prospect. But he would be our 6th best prospect at best.

I woundnt give too much credit for identifying Mikheyev sucked. They still dragged his useless ass and cap hit into the playoffs, where he hurt them. Then they paid to get rid of him. A decent cost to get rid of him, but not before he had already done damage.
ACL injury did him in.
 

TheNumber4

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
46,101
57,309
How did the Nucks like Lafferty last year? Lafferty was offered for Vinny once upon a time.

Interestingly, both also got matching $2M cap hits now. And both could use a change of scenery.
 

LemonSauceD

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 31, 2015
8,416
14,377
Vancouver
How did the Nucks like Lafferty last year? Lafferty was offered for Vinny once upon a time.

Interestingly, both also got matching $2M cap hits now. And both could use a change of scenery.
Had a strong first 45ish games of the season but then trailed off quit badly. Stopped playing physical or driving to the net for whatever reason. Wasn’t bad as a 4th line checker in the playoffs but by that point had been an offensive blackhole and had 3 points in his last 41 games including playoffs.
 

The Nuge

Some say…
Jan 26, 2011
28,038
9,407
British Columbia
Get real. Given his injury history, no one expected to get much for Edmundson.

No, it absolutely was a thing. “We got a 1st for Chiarot so we’ll get a 1st for Edmundson” was repeated ad nauseam. Heck, there were plenty of fans who were even claiming Montreal wouldn’t have to retain to get a 1st.

Retain half and take back Josh Brown.

It would probably require a 3rd team because I doubt Vancouver wants to retain, but that could make sense. Just depends if a team is willing to eat 1.5 million for a mid round pick
 

Rowlet

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 13, 2018
4,657
5,575
Try and flip? If he was worth assets, the Canucks wouldn't be trading him. I don't think you get how this works.

Desharnais is looking like he is not an NHL quality player. That's not surprising given that his resume prior consisted solely of a season and a half in Edmonton.

Flip at the next deadline. Someone will have injuries and want a big RHD for $1m for a 4th.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad