I think Hronek is a ~#3 D all things considered. Putting him on the 2nd pairing will be like, disgustingly big for the defense, even if he isn't worth the cost. (I think this is paying too much and Yzerman f***ed us lol)
My only real consolation in this trade is that the depth affect is very, very real. Adding one guy doesnt just add one guy. It moves down worse guys. Like, if we got Bedard in the lottery, all of a sudden our forward depth would look like this:
Kuzmenko-Pettersson-Beauvillier
Podkolzin-Bedard-Mikheyev
Garland-Miller-Kravtsov
Joshua-Aman-Dries
Which is, uh, very very good. It's "main thread board about the Canucks forward depth isnt a meme" good. Likewise, our depth chart on D now looks like this:
Hughes - Bear
Wolanin - Hronek
OEL - Myers
I think it's a pretty effective strategy to pair guys like Hughes and Hronek who are mobile and good at moving the puck with guys who wouldn't necessarily be #2-4D on their own. And both Bear and Wolanin are good enough to be those guys. It means that we just do not have to play OEL and Myers nearly as much for as long as they're stuck here, and they can actually be the very expensive bottom pairing they're suited for instead of the still very expensive middle pairing that plays more minutes than they should be.
Look at Calgary last year, right. Losing Tanev, one single key RHD, lost them the series vs Edmonton. Im 100% sure of that. It's not just the loss of Tanev that ruined them, it's the fact that they had to play Zadorov and Gudbranson vs McDavid and Kane for almost every shift.
Again, still not happy with the trade, but I'm trying to look at a glass thats 8/10ths empty as if it were half full.