Proposal: Utah/Habs

[HuGort]

If our guys are gone at 5, would Utah be interested in switching first round picks? For our 2nd back.

Click to read more...

 

[Mrfenn92]

Can’t imagine they would be

 

[Dead Coyote]

Not for a 2nd, that's for sure.

 

[Weltschmerz]

If our guys are gone at 5, would Utah be interested in switching first round picks? For our 2nd back.

That pick was traded via LA to the Jets.

 

[Ledge And Dairy]

What would be the point of moving up 1 spot? Utah is probably targeting Buium, Dickinson, or Silayev. Montreal probably isn't targeting any of them

 

[Lockin17]

Never happening , does not make sense..

OTT makes more sense since both Utah and Ott are looking for a D

MTL : #5 + #78
for
OTT : #7 + #39

 

[MakeCgyGreatAgain]

I can’t wait for the draft to be over so we can end these stupid trade offers.

 

[Djp]

If our guys are gone at 5, would Utah be interested in switching first round picks? For our 2nd back.

Why?

 

[HabsCode]

Never happening , does not make sense..

OTT makes more sense since both Utah and Ott are looking for a D

MTL : #5 + #78
for
OTT : #7 + #39

Would prefer 5 for 7+25 (maybe Montreal throw Avs 2nd)

 

[habsfan44]

If our guys are gone at 5, would Utah be interested in switching first round picks? For our 2nd back.

At least one of Demidov , Lindstrom , Iginla , Sennece , and Catton will be available at five .

 

[pth2]

I can’t wait for the draft to be over so we can end these stupid trade offers.

Same. All these trade offers depend so much on how different teams value various players, to the point they can't even be evaluated objectively.

 

[Hunter368]

I can’t wait for the draft to be over so we can end these stupid trade offers.

Doesn't end with the draft, at best slows slightly, but its summer time bored fans (especially rebuilding teams fans) create lots of questionable trade ideas. This is a general rule year after year, not specifically just this year.

 

[Ford Prefect]

Would prefer 5 for 7+25 (maybe Montreal throw Avs 2nd)

Don't know how likely it is, but I would do that deal (7 + 25 for 5 + our highest 2nd rounder next year). Then try and package 25 and 27 to get to 16-18 and target Stian Solberg. I just think he would be the glue to the top 4. Romanov with some offensive upside.