Garland and Bunting seem like pretty great mid-late picks, so far.
Certainly.
I consider most drafts to be 50-75 players deep, in terms of players who actually see meaningful NHL time. So, maybe we could include the back half of the 3rd round in this idea, but if you look at our drafts in the past 4 or 5 years, we actually see players in this range who are at least capable of AHL careers.
From 2005-13, Yandle was our best pick in rounds 4-7. The next best? Maybe Conor Clifton or Louis Domingue. Not many others even had prolonged AHL careers, let alone NHL.
Compare that to players like Garland, Steenbergen, Maccelli, and Prosvetov.
Players like Callahan and Bergkvist have at least shown upward trajectories. Even the players we traded like Entwistle amd Schnarr, or who we walked away from (Hoefenmayer) are much stronger skill sets to build out depth on the organization.
I know people are happy for Armstrong and what he can do. I do also think that we were starting to find that value from players in those later rounds to help drive internal competition up. If each year, we unearth players who were unlikely to make it based on draft position, amd we continue to draft players in those late rounds who then push those players for time (even at the AHL level), our overall talent level rises exponentially.