TSN Top 50 under 24 years old

[Breakers]

TSN does this list every year.
It combines the highest end prospects and their career projections with current NHL players
I've probably spelled a few names wrong

My Notes:
- I would Put Boldy ahead of Caufield easily. In fact Caufield being in the top 10 just doesnt make sense.
- San Jose hopes to god Celebrini turns out as good as Stutzle, so he should be higher
- Faber is better than Power........ hell so is Sanderson right now

1)Jack Hughes
2)Bedard
3)Celebrini
4)Stutzle
5) Power
6) Faber
7) Michkov
8) Caufield
9) Seider
10)Demidov
11) Sanderson
12)Nikiskin
13) Johnston
14) Carlsson
15) Hughes luke
16) smith
17)leonard
18) Levushenov
19)Buium
20) Boldy
21) Raymond
22) Fantilli
23) Lafreniere
24) Wolf
25) Slafkovsky
26) Jarvis
27) Hutson
28) Gauthier
29) Stankoven
30) Dickenson
31) Harley
32) Parekh
33) Askarov
34) Clark
35) Cooley
36) Knies
37) Guenther
38) Mctavish
39) Augusitine
40) Fowler
41) Sennecke
42) Lindstrom
43) Mateychuk
44) Cowan
45) Iginla
46)Guhle
47) Mintukov
48) Willander
49) Catton
50) McMicheal

Click to read more...

 

[Gliff]

How in the actual f*** are goalies in college over guys playing top 4 minutes in the NHL for multiple years now?

 

[dustybreaks]

Pretty laughable list tbh.

 

[57special]

Boldy way too low. Harley, Raymond, jarvis, also. How the hell did they sneak Cowan in there? Need to appease leafs fans, i guess?

 

[ViD]

Fantilli at 22 is crazy

 

[BKarchitect]

This is a real list? What a bizarre ranking.

I don’t usually throw stones at these kinds of lists because A) they are hard, if not impossible to rank and B) their sole purpose is to generate clicks.

But this list deserves special ridicule for being both a dumb concept and then the results looking like they literally just pulled names out of a bucket blindly.

It’s a really stupid exercise and an even stupider list.

 

[GoJackets1]

lol what is this list

 

[benfranklin]

Honestly a pretty weak list overall. Imagine if we did that team NA under 23 team or whatever today. It would look garbage compared to the team we saw back in 2017.

 

[wickedwitch]

Honestly a pretty weak list overall. Imagine if we did that team NA under 23 team or whatever today. It would look garbage compared to the team we saw back in 2017.

Two things: 1) these things go in cycles and 2) the players on this list had their development hindered by Covid.

 

[hockey20000]

bedard and celebrinni at 2 and 3 is wild.. they got potential to be the best on list but as of right now neither deserve to be that high

 

[Cowumbus]

I don’t see Kent Johnson

 

[The Nuge]

They’re doing Boldy insanely dirty with that ranking. It’s a horrible list overall, but that definitely seems the most egregious

 

[admiralcadillac]

Pretty laughable list tbh.

Isn’t that the point of these lists? Has there been even one ranking where someone like you makes this comment?

What’s your list?

 

[Chet Manley]

Guess you can't expect much out of a regional sports network.

 

[Zine]

By now I'm convinced many of these media lists are intentionally messed up to garner more clicks. Controversy and sensationalism sells.

 

[Chainshot]

Feels like they've done Mintyukov a dirty here on this as well as Boldy. Guenther down at 37 after how he killed it last year is another. Eh, whatever.

 

[benfranklin]

Two things: 1) these things go in cycles and 2) the players on this list had their development hindered by Covid.

True. Crazy to look back at how good it was in 2017. Im sure wed say the same thing around 2008 or so too.

 

[TageGod]

Trying to figure out how Power is 5 and Peterka didn't make the list.

 

[Skinnyjimmy08]

Awful awful list… what’s with the players that haven’t set foot on NHL ice ranked significantly higher than extremely good young NHLers??

Usually I don’t care about all these stupid rankings that come out but with this list I actually have to comment.

Plus also I get there is so much hype with Bedard, but cmon…#2???! Please

I can’t stop giggling at the players that Buium is ranked higher than lol

#16-19 need to be moved waaaaaaaaaaay down the list. Good prospects yes, but have no business being ranked that high

 

[GRob83]

McMichael all the way down at 50 is the most egregious ranking on the entire list.

 

[Prior]

Biased as a Wild fan but there’s maybe a small handful of players on this list I’d trade Boldy for. He’s also better than nearly all today. Not sure how much stock you can put in potential either given the growth trajectory he’s been on. He’s developing into a special player.

Faber is around where I think he should be but maybe not in the right order.

Feel pretty confident about Buium being a pretty good player but by rights he’s a bit high based on where he is right now.

 

[ole ole]

Not commenting on the order but All 5 Habs on the list deserve to be their.

 

[Golden_Jet]

That’s a bad list for TSN,
Celebrini and Bédard too high for starters.

 

[These Are The Days]

Ranking guys under 24 is such a stupid concept. You aren't young anymore at 23 playing in your +4/+5 draft year

 

[Canucks LB]

Sometimes they have decent lists, and sometimes they have something like this.

After work, I’m gonna make my own, and see what you guys think.