The Thin White Duke
Registered User
- Aug 11, 2009
- 3,909
- 1
Had an idea the other day: should teams be able to trade their lottery balls away? Now that one team no longer has a 50% chance of picking first, would it make sense to let teams have a bidding war on trying to get the top pick?
As a team with a <10% chance of winning it, if Buffalo offered a 2nd or 3rd for my lottery balls, that's something I'd definitely consider. This would probably get Edmonton to start calling the other bottom 10 teams in an arms race to keep the odds in their favor.
I think it would be overall useful; teams that have been rebuilding and have an enormous stockpile of top-90 picks (Buffalo) are better off spending them to try and guarantee the top talent in the draft, and teams in the 4-10 range that may not have committed to a total rebuild are probably better off with a few more top-90 picks for depth/trading up than a slim chance of picking 1st (Toronto, Philly).
Thoughts?
As a team with a <10% chance of winning it, if Buffalo offered a 2nd or 3rd for my lottery balls, that's something I'd definitely consider. This would probably get Edmonton to start calling the other bottom 10 teams in an arms race to keep the odds in their favor.
I think it would be overall useful; teams that have been rebuilding and have an enormous stockpile of top-90 picks (Buffalo) are better off spending them to try and guarantee the top talent in the draft, and teams in the 4-10 range that may not have committed to a total rebuild are probably better off with a few more top-90 picks for depth/trading up than a slim chance of picking 1st (Toronto, Philly).
Thoughts?