Trades & Free Agency Thread: Off-season Edition

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Updated Capwages a good replacement for CapFriendly. https://capwages.com/

  • Close by no cigar

    Votes: 16 29.1%
  • It will do until something better

    Votes: 31 56.4%
  • I like https://www.spotrac.com/nhl

    Votes: 2 3.6%
  • I'm dropping another

    Votes: 6 10.9%

  • Total voters
    55

Folignos Helmet

Registered User
Sep 4, 2020
881
944
Trading Nick Robertson making 875k would be a mistake.

This kid could score 25-30 this year if we give him solid icetime, a consistent role in the top 9 and some powerplay opportunity. We need bargain contracts like that quite badly.

He’s a bit small but he’s fast, he plays with some tenacity and he has one of the best shots on the team.

And not only all of this, he’s still an RFA after this season.
I think Brad is hoping at some point this season he can turn Lily, Kampf and futures into a solid middle 6 C. That would be about a 5 million dollar player even with Lorentz and Hakanpaa stepping into the holes left by those 2.
 

conFABulator

Registered User
Apr 11, 2021
1,533
1,347
I think Brad is hoping at some point this season he can turn Lily, Kampf and futures into a solid middle 6 C. That would be about a 5 million dollar player even with Lorentz and Hakanpaa stepping into the holes left by those 2.
I guess you don't buy into Nylander at C, because if that works out we have our two middle six C. If we make the type of move you suggest (perhaps include Jarnkrok too) then I would like to see the money spent on a top four D and let Benoit and Hakanpaa be six and seven.
 

Folignos Helmet

Registered User
Sep 4, 2020
881
944
I guess you don't buy into Nylander at C, because if that works out we have our two middle six C. If we make the type of move you suggest (perhaps include Jarnkrok too) then I would like to see the money spent on a top four D and let Benoit and Hakanpaa be six and seven.
Could also be a D.
I am not sold on Willie at C. I think we would be better off with him at wing. But I think that’s also part of the plan. If he does show well at C then as you suggest Brad takes the same stuff and goes after a D to slide OEL down to third pair.
There is time to sort this out during season.
But one small move maybe needed now to fit everyone in or when Dewar is back from injury.
 

Skullz

Registered User
Jul 5, 2013
604
819
CBJ needs bodies and to get to the cap floor.

I think they would love David Kampf at 2.4 million. Holmberg has proved he can handle the job for a lot less.

I would rather trade Kampf than Jarnkrok, and he also makes more money. Lorenz and Dewar can also play Center.

Not sure what we do with LW. Robertson is absolutely on this team, but what about Patches? If it’s one of the other, a no brainer to go with the 23 year old.
 

Kiwi

Registered User
Mar 5, 2016
21,598
16,767
The Naki
I honestly don't know what we're going to do about our 4th line

Are we going with a physical tone setting line or a defensively responsible bury them in the defensive zone line

Kampf isn't physical, but he is a good defensive forward, as is Jarnkrok and Holmberg
Reeves and Lorenz want to hit everything but I wouldn't trust either of them defensively and Dewar can do a bit of both

Those players don't mix well and when you do mix them you lose any identity you may of had and they struggle to be physical or good defensively

They need to sort it out then we know who should be on the chopping block
 

Folignos Helmet

Registered User
Sep 4, 2020
881
944
I think you put Robertson in a position to succeed and put up good numbers and then use him as part of a package at the deadline to get a C or D.

Next year you have guys like Cowan, Minten and Greba to try and fold in, something has to give on the wing, this year and long term.
 

horner

Registered User
May 22, 2007
8,323
4,716
CBJ needs bodies and to get to the cap floor.

I think they would love David Kampf at 2.4 million. Holmberg has proved he can handle the job for a lot less.

I would rather trade Kampf than Jarnkrok, and he also makes more money. Lorenz and Dewar can also play Center.

Not sure what we do with LW. Robertson is absolutely on this team, but what about Patches? If it’s one of the other, a no brainer to go with the 23 year old.
Jamkrok does nothing for me especially nothing in the playoffs.

Trade for Dickinson or Laughton
 
  • Like
Reactions: shaner8989

TheShape

Registered User
Oct 25, 2018
2,606
3,133
All I know is that Holmberg is the 4C. Move Kampf
This was literally the move a year ago, there was no need to re-sign Kampf at 2.4m. I like the player, just not at that price point. We’ve had internal options for a while now.

Anyway, Kampf won’t be a difficult player to move if we do so, we’re not going to have to add sweeteners like some think we are.
 

Sypher04

Registered User
Jan 20, 2011
12,610
11,377
I think you put Robertson in a position to succeed and put up good numbers and then use him as part of a package at the deadline to get a C or D.

Next year you have guys like Cowan, Minten and Greba to try and fold in, something has to give on the wing, this year and long term.

Or better yet, put him in a position to succeed and keep him at a steal of a contract.
 

Rare Jewel

Patience
Jan 11, 2007
19,935
4,061
Leaf Land
Or better yet, put him in a position to succeed and keep him at a steal of a contract.
Only for a season, then he'll ask for the moon.

And with Knies possibly playing with Matthews, they could also be setting him up for a contract they can't afford.

Can't do both, IMO. Also, in terms of movable pieces to bring in more help for the defence, Robertson should be used for that because there aren't any picks other teams would find appealing.
 

Sypher04

Registered User
Jan 20, 2011
12,610
11,377
Only for a season, then he'll ask for the moon.

And with Knies possibly playing with Matthews, they could also be setting him up for a contract they can't afford.

Can't do both, IMO. Also, in terms of movable pieces to bring in more help for the defence, Robertson should be used for that because there aren't any picks other teams would find appealing.

If that transpires, which may or may not be the case, then you trade him at his peak value next offseason. He’s still going to be an RFA
 

conFABulator

Registered User
Apr 11, 2021
1,533
1,347
If that transpires, which may or may not be the case, then you trade him at his peak value next offseason. He’s still going to be an RFA
This.

We would get much more for Robertson as an RFA coming off a 25 goal season. I believe we have to think about all of our players as assets to a sustained run of contending over the next four years.

When making the final selections for our roster over the next week or so, we will consider:

PLAYERS WE DON'T WANT TO LOSE ON WAIVERS:

Holmberg
Robertson

PLAYERS WE DON'T WANT TO LOSE ON WAIVERS AND SHOULD TRADE FOR SOMETHING, EVEN IF ONLY A MINIMAL RETURN:

Kampf
Jarnkrok
Timmons
Murray

PLAYERS WE CAN WAIVE WITHOUT TOO MUCH DAMAGE EVEN IF WE LOSE THEM:

Reaves
Timmons
Murray

I realize that Timmons and Murray are in both, they are bubble here and we could lose them for nothing without too much regret

PLAYERS ON IR TO START RHE SEASON

Dewar
Hakanpaa
Jarnkrok (possibly)

PLAYERS WE CAN SEND DOWN

Minten
Grebenkin
Cowan (obviously not to the Marlies)

I could see an opening lineup like this.

Knies Matthews Domi
Robertson Nylander Marner
Pacioretty Tavares McMann
Lorentz Holmberg Cowan
Reaves

Dewar (IR)

Reilly Tanev
OEL Liljegren
McCabe Benoit
Timmons

Hakanpaa (IR)

Woll
Stolarz
Murray

We trade Jarnkrok and Kampf, demote Minten and Grebenkin. We could keep Jarnkrok and waive Reaves also. We could also flip Cowan and McMann.

Once the season starts and injuries hit we can shuffle as necessary. It's a solid lineup to start the season and we don't lose any assets of value. We could even recoup a few picks and get some cap space to accrue.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad