He’s realistically the best trade chip to make an impactful change to the playoff roster and future roster.
There’s only 1 goalie in the net at any given moment. A good 3C is more impactful than a backup G in the playoffs.
The only reason I’d move Woll before Stolarz is because of his significant injury history (ironically Stolarz goes out as I type this).
Im not comfortable with Woll taking the majority of starts either. Has Woll ever proven he can handle a starters load?This is exactly why you don't move Woll... you comfortable with Murray in net if Stolarz gets hurt in your scenario? I like AA and Hildeby, but zero NHL experience... you just can't do this at all.
Im not comfortable with Woll taking the majority of starts either. Has Woll ever proven he can handle a starters load?
They said that about Boston the last 2 years - the only team they beat in the playoffs was the Leafs and it wasn’t because they had 2 great goalies.Moreso than AA or Hildeby.
It's been said about the Leafs, that they have the best goaltending in the league so far this year... you just don't break that up.
You honestly can't see why this isn't just a bad idea, but a terrible idea?They said that about Boston the last 2 years - the only team they beat in the playoffs was the Leafs and it wasn’t because they had 2 great goalies.
I see more upside in trading Woll for Sillinger than I see downside.You honestly can't see why this isn't just a bad idea, but a terrible idea?
How good do you think Woll is?Sorry, that's just nuts.
Unfortunately with Utah moving off Geekie it looks like they're committed to Hayton/Cooley as 1/2C for the future.I keep going back to Hayton.
But my dream would be McTavish.
I’d be fine with McBain as well.Unfortunately with Utah moving off Geekie it looks like they're committed to Hayton/Cooley as 1/2C for the future.
McBain has been playing LW instead of C this year - he's the most likely of the young Utah C's to be available.
I can appreciate your viewpoint. At 50%, maybe.. certainly not full hit. Even then, it's if they are basically giving him away. The only attractive thought to obtain him, is that he's a player who worked VERY well with Rielly last time. We thought he was tool old and toast last time too.. but then they just really worked well together. He's been much better this year, than last... actually I'd say fairly decent. His on ice expected goals is 47.5%, just slightly below team average, while starting over 60% of the time in the Dzone... second heaviest defensive assignment on the team... that's not bad, considering how bad they've been.
Or, maybe as a package deal with RoR... if we decide that we needed a C upgrade, and he was the guy, and wanted to come back.... He did have success with Berube in the past, so you never know.
People were talking originally about needing someone to work well with Rielly, so it was a thought... who knows if that's what we end up needing....
Similar to how the Leafs wanted Tanev/Zadorov in a package last year, I wouldn't be opposed to a Gourde/Borgen package this year.