Unless they have a trade lined up, Reaves is probably getting waived.Yeah. We can fill that from within I would think. I don't mean the "enforcer" role, I mean the 7 to 9 minutes of ice time.
This one is easy to to me. Waive Reaves, if we lose him, we lose him. If we don't, we get the roster spot and most of the cap space. He doesn't have to play for the Marlies and will probably still dress him from time to time but his roster spot is better shared across Dewar, Steeves, Minten, and Grebenkin.
I am losing track, who are the three LTIR guys? Jarnkrok and who else? Paccioretty?Unless they have a trade lined up, Reaves is probably getting waived.
If they demote Minten and Grebs, and waive Reaves... they can hold onto everyone until the 3 LTIR amigos show up.
This buys them time until they have a trade worked out to unload players. Trying to get players through waivers is probably the last resort.
Jarnkrok, Kampf, and Paccioretty.I am losing track, who are the three LTIR guys? Jarnkrok and who else? Paccioretty?
Kampf is LTIR? I didn't know that.Jarnkrok, Kampf, and Paccioretty.
Once one of these show up, and assuming everyone is healthy, we are playing Waiver Russian Roulette unless they have trades lined up.
This assumes Minten and Grebs go down, and they waive Reaves who no one will claim.
I would have some interest in Puljujarvi for the 4th line RW.
This. The Kadri trade simply won't work here.Would love Kadri back but not with that contract. I doubt Calgary or any team retains 50% of it either for that many years.
Brock Nelson will cost too much in assets and cap than we can afford. He'll get an absolute haul this deadline.Honestly I'd love Kadri, but I just don't see how it makes sense with that contract. The dude has 3.5 years left at 7M and is 34 years old. Would cost a massive premium to get Calgary to retain a meaningful amount for 3.5 years, and then you still run the risk of bringing in a 34 year old with 3.5 years left on his contract (and paying a premium for doing so).
Id be looking more at Brock Nelson, Gourde, Giroux (if Ottawa falls out), Granlund, etc.
Depends on how big of upgrade and what hole you're trying to fill. If the objective is just to get a slightly cheaper 4th line thats slightly more effective 5v5, then sure thats an internal play.Yeah. We can fill that from within I would think. I don't mean the "enforcer" role, I mean the 7 to 9 minutes of ice time.
I'm old enough to remember when having Kadri in the playoffs seemed like a dream come true.Just a reminder that Kadri had 29 goals
and 79 points last year.
Having Kadri in the playoffs would be a dream come true. This man loves the team and will sacrifice everything for us to win. He is exactly the guy we will need for the long playoff battles. Best 2/3 option for me AINEC. If they can do it, I’m all for it.