Larcos_Unal
Excuses are for losers
We now have the brothers Nylander united, perhaps Dallas would be willing to unite the Robertsons?
Kadri didn’t work as a #3C before and in skeptical because he’s the same as Tavares but signs for much longer at a non bargain cap hit
He would be 2C as soon as next year and this year he wouldn't be a typical 3C. He likely gets Nylander as his winger. Even if they re-sign JT, Kadri would likely be the 2C next year.
Personally I think it would be a great move and not just because of nostalgia. More talent, more grit, and more cup experience.
Kadri is the same age as Tavares … signed for 4 more years at $7 mill AAV
For all the talk about Tavares’ decline and becoming nothing more than a #4C, isn’t Kadri susceptible to the same decline?
He only has 5 goals and 10 points this season
So Tre has been kicking tires on Kadri? Can Calgary not be such little babies and actually trade with us?
He did absolutely nothing for the team and then said some crappy things after he left. No thanks.
Why do so many think he trashed the city?No interest in that dick.
He has negative things to say about the team so he can kick rocks
I'd be a bit nervous about that but excited at the same time. Certainly it would accelerate things even more than the D contracts already have, so perhaps in line with the strategy in play.Tavares is having a great year this year so, for me, his "decline" doesn't really play a part. But the Leafs may let him walk depending on the contract ask.
I think Kadri will age well. I think he's a bit faster than JT which is why I would peg him as the 2C next year.
Either way the team could do alot worse than JT and Kadri as their 2/3 C's for the next 2-3 years. Matthews, Marner, Nylander are still young enough along with the youth coming up.
With all of these injuries leading to auditions (Minten, Grebenkin, Steeves) and signings (Nylander, and not waiver exempt) we may finally have a roster crunch once we get guys back healthy. We may be in a position to move two for one in a deal or two.
Robertson and Kampf (+???) for Granlund with some retention.
Holmberg for Acciari?
Knies Matthews Domi
Paccioretty Tavares Marner
A. Nylander Granlund W. Nylander
Lorentz Acciari McMann
Dewar
Reaves (waived)
Jarnkrok (LTIR)
Steeves, Minten, Grebenkin (Marlies)
That's a contending forward group, no?
Agreed on both. The "+?" in my framework would not be a 1st for Granlund. He make some sense if we get him early, but he is not great defensively and is getting his points with 21 minutes a night he won't get here. He could form a strong third scoring line with Willy though. I had forgotten they had no retention slots. I would add Niemela to the deal, not sure that moves SJ. I am not sure how much I want to give up for $2M in retention for 60 games.Granlund would makes some sense. San Jose has no retention slots, so we'd need to find another team to do that. With the season he's having, might be hard to do without a 1st and by dumping them Kampf. Robertson's value isn't great right now.
I like Acciari a lot on a "buy low". Doesn't produce much for his cap but adds a big time physical and defensive element. Problem becomes having 2 defensive centers/players that don't produce a lot taking up a lot of space assuming Kampf stays through the season, which I think he will.
Would be a big time Reaves upgrade as well.Acciari only works as a Kampf replacement. Agreed we can't have boboth.
Yeah. We can fill that from within I would think. I don't mean the "enforcer" role, I mean the 7 to 9 minutes of ice time.Would be a big time Reaves upgrade as well.