All Mod Cons
Registered User
- Sep 7, 2018
- 12,110
- 13,247
I'd prefer if we just let him walk. I like it when that happens. I feel it helps the organization.
Not sure Chicago would be interested in that.Bunting Sandin and a first could land us a big fish in a trade.
For Kane retained?
First off I don't have a problem with him. People will present many reasons for not trading him and they would be perfectly valid.
I just see many own-rentals on the horizon. Bunting is a lot of what we have already, but not as skilled as our big contract forwards. There's no question that he'll likely find a new contract with a team willing to pay him like a top 6 winger. Toronto will lose him for nothing. if people see some kind of sneaky value here then why doesn't Dubas move him for a forward who offers something different. Matthews is learning to impose his size more, Marner is not imposing, and Bunting does not impose much.
Would a left winger with size and jam (and with term) be the most prudent thing here.
Toronto doesn't have prospects or draft picks to bring in a different player. Bunting could be the guy.
I'm just trying to think creatively here because the own rental line-up has been too loaded for too long.
I respect your opinion. I will name some names soon. But as for your Bunting buddies comment...I mean Matthews was also buddies with Marleau. It's pro sports. Players accept that things like this happen.So who is this left winger, with size and jam, and is signed with term, at a reasonable cap hit for what they bring? That we can also fit in, this year, on the cap just by moving Bunting?
The challenge being... if they are as good as Bunting, they cost just as much as Bunting would have, and you are back at square one.
I mean, I come up with two names.... Crouse's contract is gross. Comtois, who needs a new contract at the end of the year, and wasn't very good last year, for a multitude of reasons.... but basically, your only option is maybe Comtois. Comtois's cap hit this year, is also double Buntings... causing us issues this year.
Not to mention, Bunting and Matty are buddies, and now you've pissed off Matty.
If anyone has seen his recent interview, the guy wants out pretty bad. As Mr. MGMT suggests, the price is simply too high.
I don’t know what’s required to get Kane, but this makes some sense.Bunting Sandin and a first could land us a big fish in a trade.
For Kane retained?
Isn't Bunting a pending UFA? I don't think Chicago would be interested in that.I don’t know what’s required to get Kane, but this makes some sense.
Bunting Sandin and a first could land us a big fish in a trade.
For Kane retained?
EvanderLOL. Patrick Kane for some tin, eh? Yeah, that'll happen.
I need creative people here to think tank this issue because the own rental thing is what's been going on in leaf land. Even if we win a cup this year it's going to be next year's problem. I'm glad you like Bunting, but I'm afraid he's going to be gone next season. Why not get some assets, players with term, fill in with Bunting as a main piece.So we are going to trade one guy who has some grit ( althoug I think his gritty game is a bit overhyped)
A player that's from Toronto, has decent chemistry can get us 20 goals for an aging veteran?
Why trade a very likeable player who can produce for someone who may or may not fit ?
Kane is too, but he’s a game changer.Isn't Bunting a pending UFA? I don't think Chicago would be interested in that.
I know what you mean but Bunting is a tough one. I feel like he'd take a bit of a discount. He gets to play with 2 of the best players in the world and be in his home town. I know Hyman was a similar case and he bolted. I guess it depends a lot on this year.I need creative people here to think tank this issue because the own rental thing is what's been going on in leaf land. Even if we win a cup this year it's going to be next year's problem. I'm glad you like Bunting, but I'm afraid he's going to be gone next season. Why not get some assets, players with term, fill in with Bunting as a main piece.
But letting him walk is a non-option.Id pass on the bunting trade. I actually see him as a good candidate for a longer term (to lower aav) extension.
I know what you mean but Bunting is a tough one. I feel like he'd take a bit of a discount. He gets to play with 2 of the best players in the world and be in his home town. I know Hyman was a similar case and he bolted. I guess it depends a lot on this year.
I do agree too many times Leafs haven't got assets for expiring contracts they probably should of but Bunts I think could be a guy that they could keep around if they get the right average and term.
Kerfoot probably goes at the end of the year. Maybe Holl too just by walking. That frees up quite a bit for Bunting. You also hope the Leafs get lucky and hit on some of these young guys so they have a couple forwards really cheap for the next few years.
Haha definitely if that helps keep him here then yeah you do that.Having Dubas' and Keefe here I think is a major sell for him.
The Leafs would likely just need to give him the total of money he'd make on a two year deal with another team spread out over a longer period. Like over 4-6 years worth of term. That way he'd get money and job security
Having another buddy of Matthews on the team also wouldn't hurt for other reasons too....