Value of: Trade Value of Injured Goalie?

  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.
    • Our 2025 light and dark themes were lost, so we are rebuilding them. Light theme is currently available, but work in progress

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server

Canucks LB

My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
Oct 12, 2008
75,974
28,018
252
honest question:

Elite goalie coming off back to back injury seasons.

Contract still decent, signed next year for 5m.

Goalie market seems really light, what do you all think he can get in a trade?
 
2nd/3rd round pick and MAYBE a B/C level prospect for the contract slot. Injury history is a buyer beware at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee
Imo Demko has less little to no trade value. Van will play him next year (his UFA season) and hope he can stay healthy. Then, if he can prove he can stay healthy, they might consider trading him. But considering their owner, it’s more likely (even if he’s healthy and back to Vézina level) that owner allows a trade.
 
Demko is good when healthy, so that gives me concern.

Like, I would think it's Demko for a lesser goalie, maybe something with Demko depending on the cap of the returning goalie.

Or a team with a backup spot, or like a 1B spot available and take the risk and send a player who is an NHLer, but he's overpaid type return.

Probably better to just go again with him
 
Demko is good when healthy, so that gives me concern.

Like, I would think it's Demko for a lesser goalie, maybe something with Demko depending on the cap of the returning goalie.

Or a team with a backup spot, or like a 1B spot available and take the risk and send a player who is an NHLer, but he's overpaid type return.

Probably better to just go again with him
Vancouver doesn't have much choice; they need him next season. Lankinen is NOT a #1 and can't handle the load of a #1. the knee jerk reaction to sign him to such a high contract is baffling
 
I want to preface this by saying I think he does return to being an elite top 5 goalie in this league. But for how long before hes injured again?

He'd definitely get claimed on waivers, but he doesn't have much trade value. Probably the kind of middling picks that are always traded
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee
The majority of teams would have zero interest, as he can't be trusted and is paid 5m in cap. A team like San Jose would take a flyer on him to pair with Askarov for possibly a 5th rounder and try and repair his value for a trade.
 
Demko is good when healthy, so that gives me concern.

Like, I would think it's Demko for a lesser goalie, maybe something with Demko depending on the cap of the returning goalie.

Or a team with a backup spot, or like a 1B spot available and take the risk and send a player who is an NHLer, but he's overpaid type return.

Probably better to just go again with him
Talking about a healthy Demko feels like talking about the sasquash...
 

Ad

Ad