Adam Michaels
Registered User
What's the scouting report on Harrison Brunicke on the Pens?
Other than he has a terrible name, I can't offer anything of value.
What's the scouting report on Harrison Brunicke on the Pens?
it will be Lindros all over againHughes would be one hell of a GM if he trades Roy to Columbus for Jiricek and to Rangers for Kakko at the same time. One player to two different teams.
Dach's trade value is in the toilet; there is no reason to trade him. I also doubt Newhook has more value than a 2nd. Pro scouting needs to be reevaluated and do a better job because we gave up pretty solid assets here and don't have a guaranteed 2nd line center from it. I'm not going to count the likes of Matheson/Laine/Monahan since we essentially got paid to take them on or had to take them on to make the trade work.
Wasn't it him that had a great camp and they wanted to keep him around?What's the scouting report on Harrison Brunicke on the Pens?
Dach for Malkin and a 1st. Giving away 10 years of Dach production, need need to compensate as Habs aren't competing for years Malkin is here.
Suffice it to say, they're not good trade partners for Dach.
i would not trade Dach for Pens 1st. Habs are trying to be competitive in the next year or two, A 1st next year won't help them with that and they already have a plethora of picks and one of the deepest farms in the NHL. They need help now that they can add to their core this year or within the next 2 years.Would you not trade Dach for the Pens 1st straight up?
If so, hard to grasp why Malkin would be worth nothing
I would think that the value of PIT 1st would be higher right now then Dach. So while this is a not a move that help you right away, you may want to consider it if you think you can move it (or CAL 1st) for another piece that can help you sooner.i would not trade Dach for Pens 1st. Habs are trying to be competitive in the next year or two, A 1st next year won't help them with that and they already have a plethora of picks and one of the deepest farms in the NHL. They need help now that they can add to their core this year or within the next 2 years.
I wouldn't trade Newhook for Jiricek. I dont see the need to add him when you have a similar guy in Mailloux in the system.MTL : Newhook + Barron + Sam Harris
for
CLB : Jiricek
Columbus won't trade Lindstrom...To CBJ: Dach + Reinbacher .... patch it up
To MTL: Jiricek + Lindstrom .... or patch this one up
I'm off by what on which side?
i would not trade Dach for Pens 1st. Habs are trying to be competitive in the next year or two, A 1st next year won't help them with that and they already have a plethora of picks and one of the deepest farms in the NHL. They need help now that they can add to their core this year or within the next 2 years.
Yeah, me either. It was more a not-so-subtle dig at the selection (I wasn't a huge fan of the pick that high in the draft). And not at the player, I hope he recovers fully and we can see what he brings to the game.I was thinking more about Sillinger or Johnson. I dont see them moving Lindstrom anytime soon.
Trying to be competitive and being competitive are 2 different things.i would not trade Dach for Pens 1st. Habs are trying to be competitive in the next year or two, A 1st next year won't help them with that and they already have a plethora of picks and one of the deepest farms in the NHL. They need help now that they can add to their core this year or within the next 2 years.
thats pretty crazy Dach is nowhere near worth a top 5 pick even if you wanna compete next year that 1st will land you a player 10 times better then Kirbyi would not trade Dach for Pens 1st. Habs are trying to be competitive in the next year or two, A 1st next year won't help them with that and they already have a plethora of picks and one of the deepest farms in the NHL. They need help now that they can add to their core this year or within the next 2 years.
And we wouldn't trade Reinbacher until we've beaten his name into nothingness... Go figure. The promise of greatness is always better than greatness itself ah.Columbus won't trade Lindstrom...
I can't imagine that Pens pick wouldn't be top 10 protected. So if the pick gets deferred to 2026, that's yet another year you have to wait and not likely another top 10 pick. if habs are to trade Dach, i would hope it would be as part of a package to get another, more established center that fits the core now and can help them win right away. All the talk from management is that they want to avoid a "losing" atmosphere and start to win and be more competitive sooner than later. Add to that Laine is coming back and hopefully give dach a true scoring winger for the first time in his carrer. It will take some time for both of them to get back into full game shape, but I think you have to give Dach that chance before giving up on him, particularly for a 2025, possibly 2026 pick when they already have Demidov and Hage on the door step.I would think that the value of PIT 1st would be higher right now then Dach. So while this is a not a move that help you right away, you may want to consider it if you think you can move it (or CAL 1st) for another piece that can help you sooner.
I wouldn't trade Newhook for Jiricek. I dont see the need to add him when you have a similar guy in Mailloux in the system.
Barron+ Harris, sure.
I'm not opposed to trading anyone on the roster as long as they can get a better player in return. Habs have a trove of picks and prospects they can add to a deal to improve their roster. Trading Dach for a pick doesn't do them any good for years to come when they need help now. So if you're getting a few years of an aging Malkin to act as a stop gap and veteran to help the kids, it can't cost you a player like Dach who's shown he can be a dominate force and likely just needs some time and help to get going, Maybe revisit at the deadline when he has more time under his belt and Laine as a winger for a few months to see how they do together to bolster the 2nd line.Wow... I get the rationale, I just don't see the Habs or any other organization (regardless of roster make-up), passing up on a likely top 5 lottery pick to keep Dach.
Quite reasonable to expect the Habs could just as easily turn around and swap that pick (or an existing lesser prospect made redundant by the prospect picked with it) for an established upgrade on Dach and still end up ahead.... Heck, we acquired Dach minus the major knee injury and 3 more seasons without establishing his top 6 chops, for the 13OA pick.
I very much agree that the roster next fall should be bolstered rather than weakened, but overall effective asset management is the way to do that and a top 5 pick for Dach seems like a no-brainer imo
Thats pretty crazy Dach is nowhere near worth a top 5 pick even if you wanna compete next year that 1st will land you a player 10 times better then Kirby
Ok... That's obviously completely different value.I can't imagine that Pens pick wouldn't be top 10 protected.
Again, completely different scenario.So if the pick gets deferred to 2026, that's yet another year you have to wait and not likely another top 10 pick.
Sure. But the question was wether or not you thought the Pens 1st was worth Dach.if habs are to trade Dach, i would hope it would be as part of a package to get another, more established center that fits the core now and can help them win right away.
Agree fullyAll the talk from management is that they want to avoid a "losing" atmosphere and start to win and be more competitive sooner than later. Add to that Laine is coming back and hopefully give dach a true scoring winger for the first time in his carrer. It will take some time for both of them to get back into full game shape, but I think you have to give Dach that chance before giving up on him, particularly for a 2025, possibly 2026 pick when they already have Demidov and Hage on the door step.
What that pick is affects this statement.I'm not opposed to trading anyone on the roster as long as they can get a better player in return. Habs have a trove of picks and prospects they can add to a deal to improve their roster. Trading Dach for a pick doesn't do them any good for years to come when they need help now.
I think if you add Malkin for minimum this year & next (if healthy, good likelihood he extends on a team friendly deal, especially if team is pushing into contention... Pavelski-like vet impact would be a nice top 9 piece in that young core), the loss of Dach is ok.So if you're getting a few years of an aging Malkin to act as a stop gap and veteran to help the kids, it can't cost you a player like Dach who's shown he can be a dominate force and likely just needs some time and help to get going, Maybe revisit at the deadline when he has more time under his belt and Laine as a winger for a few months to see how they do together to bolster the 2nd line.
AgreedI've always said that the Habs will go as far as their 2nd line will take them. They haven't been healthy or together long enough to even have tested a real second line yet.
Sure... You stated you wouldn't do Dach for Malkin + 1st... Maybe you were exaggerating, but that's what I was curious about. I think you've clarified. CheersPens are NOT trading a top 5 pick for Dach. That would be crazy. If they were to dangle their 1st unprotected then yes, no brainer to make that deal and likely get two 1st in the top 10 in a deep draft but that's not happening.
Much older players have suddenly emerged as players in the mediocre NHL - Gaudette, Donato, . Hell Necas who should be a 70 pter is leading the league.The ship has sailed on Kakko
Ok... That's obviously completely different value.
Again, completely different scenario.
Sure. But the question was wether or not you thought the Pens 1st was worth Dach.
Agree fully
What that pick is affects this statement.
I think if you add Malkin for minimum this year & next (if healthy, good likelihood he extends on a team friendly deal, especially if team is pushing into contention... Pavelski-like vet impact would be a nice top 9 piece in that young core), the loss of Dach is ok.
Malkin is better now, likely still better next season, and by year 3-4 we've got players like Beck, Mesar & Hage who will be pushing for top 9 roles and can play C.
Agreed
Sure... You stated you wouldn't do Dach for Malkin + 1st... Maybe you were exaggerating, but that's what I was curious about. I think you've clarified. Cheers