Scriptor
Registered User
- Jan 1, 2014
- 8,299
- 5,282
I don't see the point of removing veterans to sign other veterans.Or just sign veterans to support the kids with all the cap space created.
Anyway, it would be next to impossible to move all those players before the season or even by next off-season. But hopefully there is progress made in that regard. Every little bit helps clear space in the lineup and cap space.
Wait out the contracts, at worst, for those veterans who aren't part of the future, if you don't find takers on the trade front.
Armia is not a cancer in the dressing room, actually appreciated by everyone, except the fans, I guess.
Gallagher is clearly overpaid for the production he brings at this stage in his career, but he's an example of effort and perseverance every time he gets on the ice.
There is nothing bad about the following players during the time left on their contracts for the roles they play. It only presents itself as a problem if they play bigger roles than they should and block better and younger players needing TOI; Petry, Dvorak, Allen, Anderson.
People forget that prospects need to push out veterans by the level of play they bring, not get free passes in key roles with choice TOI without deserving it. That's just a recipe for disaster, IMO. It sets up youngsters to fail, or to develop bad habits because there is no accountability.
Price could be moved, but his recent move to Robidas Island is not concern for the Habs cap structure during the remaining life of his contract.
It cam out in the press that Petry said he and his wife would make the best of it if he were to play in Montreal this season.we all don't know if he will come to MTL though
It wasn't a press conference statement, but it was made.
Where is this bogeyman coming from that it's unsure whether Petry would comer not to Montreal?
Obviously, everyone involved would prefer a trade were to happen before the start of the season, but, there is no suggestion of a holdout if no trade comes through.