Holden Caufield
Registered User
Do you also like the idea of tanking for #1 all next year ?I like indie music. All's I want is for Seth Barton to play games.
Do you also like the idea of tanking for #1 all next year ?I like indie music. All's I want is for Seth Barton to play games.
Now do Hagel and DeBrincat. You are slowly but surely getting to my point...
Now do Hagel and Berggren. Like I said, slowly but surely.No, you're actually making mine. Context of the contracts makes a f*** ton of difference.
At the time of signing their respective 3 year bridge deals...
Hagel: nearly 23, 53 games played, 9 goals, 24 points
DeBrincat: nearly 22, 162 games played, 69 goals, 128 points
Hagel signed for 1.5, DeBrincat for 6.4.
Hagel is one year away from needing a new deal, if he comes out and repeats his performance, do you think that he's signing for 1.5 again? The best comparable we have this year as a RFA with two years of strong performance around the age is Troy Terry. Terry's numbers are a bit better than Hagel's this past year, but with the cap going up in the coming years, salary figures are probably fine to use. Whether Tampa signs Hagel or not is unknown. What I can tell you is that Evolving Hockey is projecting Terry to sign for $6.2 million on a 4 year term, almost $7.8 million on an 8 year term.
And then what will you say?
Now do Hagel and Berggren. Like I said, slowly but surely.
Going to be honest with you, I think he is just trolling anyone and everyone. He randomly brings up arguments that make no sense in the active conversation that is occurring and then talks down to you because you are wrong lol. Quite interesting mental gymnastics every time he responds somewhere.No, I am not going to do Berggren because it escapes the parameters of reasonable. Comparing second contracts and later to ELCs completely ignores context. But you are essentially confirming your end goal is to reach a point where you prove that a rookie on an ELC that scored 28 points is more valuable than everyone else we have discussed to this point? A list that includes Connor McDavid.
You are quite bad at developing any form of evidence backed arguments. This will be my last post engaging you on this topic because everyone here is worse off having tried to follow your logic.
I have never once stated this or intended to. Merely addressing the point that a 28pt rookie isn't destined to be that forever. And that getting solid play on a 2nd contract has a ton of value compared to even better play a guy on his UFA cash in contract. You nicely pointed out a few such players.No, I am not going to do Berggren because it escapes the parameters of reasonable. Comparing second contracts and later to ELCs completely ignores context. But you are essentially confirming your end goal is to reach a point where you prove that a rookie on an ELC that scored 28 points is more valuable than everyone else we have discussed to this point? A list that includes Connor McDavid.
You are quite bad at developing any form of evidence backed arguments. This will be my last post engaging you on this topic because everyone here is worse off having tried to follow your logic.
What mental gymnastics? Like I said before, it's not my fault you don't realize that post #330 and #335 say the exact same thing.Going to be honest with you, I think he is just trolling anyone and everyone. He randomly brings up arguments that make no sense in the active conversation that is occurring and then talks down to you because you are wrong lol. Quite interesting mental gymnastics every time he responds somewhere.
Not even 3 years.
Surely you are not trying to compare and project Berggren to be like Datsyuk, who went on to be the best player in the entire world for a short period of time, just because of coincidental timelines.
Fun fact. This coming season, Berggren will be the same age that Debrincat scored 32 goals and 56 points in 52 games (Covid shortened season). Meaning he was well on his way to his second career 40+ goal season. He was second in the league in goals per game that year behind only Auston Matthews.
But tell me more about how Berggren's potential is so much more valuable than things DeBrincat has already proven he can do...
If Michkov is there at #5 and for some reason Hughes don't want to draft him.
Detroit gets:
#5 and drafts Michkov.
Montreal gets:
#9 + #17 and draft Dvorsky and Honzek (and Strbak at #31, advancing toward their secret goal of icing an all Slovak line-up).
Who says no?
That, I'm good with.
Moving Zadina isn’t weird for us, Go Sens. It makes perfect sense. He’s terrible and we don’t want him and have no real long term plan for him so it makes total sense. Otherwise we’re going to fire him out of the mitten using our giant fan made trebuchet.
I'll bite.
Berggren's potential is that he scores around the same rate as Debrincat, maybe a little less.
Berggren will also not screw up the cap.
Some guys take a while. We had a few kids that took 4-5+ years before they did much of anything. Particularly ones from overseas.1) and the likelihood of him hitting that potential? Remember, we are almost five years post draft for him. You’d be trading for Debrincat to get the potential realized now
2). Debrincat would ALSO not screw up the cap. At 9m, landing Cat doesn’t prevent you from extending Seider or Edvinsson or Kasper or any of your big guns. Debrincat or Copp + Chiarot? Or Perron + Chiarot?
It makes the Captain, make less than Debrincat.But Zadina in 21-22 scored 24 points on an ELC and made like 900k. And then signed for 1.8m for three years. Man, is Debrincat gonna be 4-5x better than him? That seems dumb!
1) and the likelihood of him hitting that potential? Remember, we are almost five years post draft for him. You’d be trading for Debrincat to get the potential realized now
2). Debrincat would ALSO not screw up the cap. At 9m, landing Cat doesn’t prevent you from extending Seider or Edvinsson or Kasper or any of your big guns. Debrincat or Copp + Chiarot? Or Perron + Chiarot?
Not only that... I'd rather have Copp or Perron than DeBrincat. Cheaper and bring similar on-ice value and we don't have to give up any assets for them. Copp being a center and two-way play, particularly the PK and defending lead situations. Perron is basically the same type of player as DeBrincat. Just older, $4M cheaper, a hair less productive but with leadership qualities in the room. Where you'd want them in the lineup is a complete overlap on the Venn Diagram. And that place in the lineup is also ultimately where you want Raymond to get to. How many medium to small right-shot wingers do we need?It makes the Captain, make less than Debrincat.
How is Detroit getting rid of those players? You have to pay for Debrincat, and Ottawa doesn't want long-term contracts in return.
People are so against proven point producers lol everyone like not seeing this team in the playoffs? lol you trade Zadina and picks in a heart beat for DeBrincat don't be stupid. Who cares if we have to overpay a little the guy is good.
Not only that... I'd rather have Copp or Perron than DeBrincat. Cheaper and bring similar on-ice value and we don't have to give up any assets for them. Copp being a center and two-way play, particularly the PK and defending lead situations. Perron is basically the same type of player as DeBrincat. Just older, $4M cheaper, a hair less productive but with leadership qualities in the room. Where you'd want them in the lineup is a complete overlap on the Venn Diagram. And that place in the lineup is also ultimately where you want Raymond to get to. How many medium to small right-shot wingers do we need?
Absolutely. Target high end. Not a tiny top 6 shooter that is only linked to us because he's from the state.More than what we have, because we don’t have top end talent. We haven’t had a 40 goal scorer since 2009. Nothing is saying Debrincat would be a 40 goal guy here, but he’d be the first guy with that potential since Hossa.
The Wings have a bunch of the same okay NHLers. Cat is potentially an upper end piece. You have to give to get something high end
Even in this draft, the odds of 17 having a career as good or better than Debrincat are under 10 percent.Ok.
Say, Zadina and 2023 1sr(#17) for Debrincat.
To me, no thanks. Debrincat is a great winger, but with the make-up of Detroit, I don't think they will pay for another small forward.
WE NEED GOALS WE DONT HAVE GOAL SCORERS I DONT CARE IF THE KID IS 4'11 HE PRODUCESOk.
Say, Zadina and 2023 1sr(#17) for Debrincat.
To me, no thanks. Debrincat is a great winger, but with the make-up of Detroit, I don't think they will pay for another small forward.