are we to resign every player whos contract comes up irregardless? no.
cally is asking for top line money. hes a 2/3 tweener trending down with a broken body and limited offensive upside. hes not worth 6/6.
anyone who agrees to his contract demands is a legit dope.
see, the thing is with contracts and negotiating, its always adversarial. its always minimize your positives and maximize the negative so as to get the best deal for your side. that the art of the deal. buy low, sell high... donald trump. all that.
hockey is a business. business isnt always nice. life isnt nice.
nothing personal but it is what it is, as they say.
Yeah, still don't want him at his "discounted" price. I'd rather keep Richards.
The Rangers are mulling over Ales Hemsky and if they can get him for a third round pick. The Oilers will want a second round pick because they don’t have one. (Sportsnet)
Spector also notes that if the Rangers lose Ryan Callahan may they look at Alex Burrows around the draft. (Sportsnet)
Rossi is reporting Kesler wants to play for his USA coach, Bylsma, in Pittsburgh. Probably on Sid's wing.
I don't want to split hairs but he's not asking for top line money. Vanek is probably going to ask for something like 10 million per.
You're right about it being a business. When you negotiate for x amount of dollars, you don't ask for x, you ask for x + y. It seems like a lot of fans have been insulted by Callahan. I'm sure Girardi's agent bounced around some pretty high figures before they agreed to a deal. His negotiations just haven't been as public.
well that's debatable. for what cally brings and will likely bring going forward, i submit that his demand IS top line money. dollars divided by production for him is pretty dismal.
vanek asking for top line money is reasonable as hes a proven sniper and top line type guy. his dollars divided by production quotient is much better.
callys is terrible.
I don't understand what you're trying to say. 6 million per is not what a top line player asks for in free agency unless he's offering a discount.
If you just don't think Callahan is a good player, that's fine.
Hemsky for a 3rd is OK in my books. But I'd rather have that 3rd moved for Stempniak. This is of course on condition that Callahan is traded. Either Stempniak or Hemsky would suffice as rental players.
I don't understand what you're trying to say. 6 million per is not what a top line player asks for in free agency unless he's offering a discount.
If you just don't think Callahan is a good player, that's fine.
i love it the Penguins and Bruins continue to trade for players that help, yet the Rangers rather overpay their own players or some UFA that does not fit here.. great thinking Glen Sather. does he know its not 1980, and teams need size and grit to win in the playoffs.![]()
I don't understand what you're trying to say. 6 million per is not what a top line player asks for in free agency unless he's offering a discount.
If you just don't think Callahan is a good player, that's fine.
He is not a $6 million dollar player.
So....because other teams make mistakes the rangers should follow suit? The Clowe and Clarkson contracts are disasters...He's worth around six million. Go look at Horton, Clarkson, and Clowe's contracts. That's the market.
Top line players don't ask for 6+ per, they ask for 8-10 per. That's where contracts are trending. When you reach free agency you get paid, it is what it is.
He's worth around six million. Go look at Horton, Clarkson, and Clowe's contracts. That's the market.
Top line players don't ask for 6+ per, they ask for 8-10 per. That's where contracts are trending. When you reach free agency you get paid, it is what it is.
He's worth around six million. Go look at Horton, Clarkson, and Clowe's contracts. That's the market.
Top line players don't ask for 6+ per, they ask for 8-10 per. That's where contracts are trending. When you reach free agency you get paid, it is what it is.