Everyone has their take as to what the problems are. Mine:
1) 4th line is insufficient, Spezza cannot handle the demands of a 4C, good at RW, but too much for him at 4C today.
2) 2nd line: I like Kerfoot, but he's a quality player on a line that doesn't work.
3) Defense: we're missing something, but I don't think we're far off.
4) Goaltending: the Campell/Mrazek tandem looked enticing to start the season, not now.
How to address? Somewhat ordered...
1) Knies and 1st to Arizona. To Toronto, Crouse, 2nd and 3rd (while Knies may prove to be the the more valuable player, Crouse is better today and controllable tomorrow. Knies would have to be attractive to Arizona. I believe the two picks are more valuable than the 1st)
2) I am a fan of Michael McLeod with NJ. I think he would be a fine 4C, allowing Spezza/Simmonds to occupy RW on that line with success. To NJ: Abruzzes, Dermott and 3rd (Arizona) for McLeod, a 4th and 7th .
3) Roughly: To Seattle, Kerfoot and Mrazek, to Toronto, Gio at 50% and Grubauer(-1.5M/). For Toronto, a L side D of: Rielly/Muzz/Gio/Sandin is pretty solid, and Grubauer has been historically better than his effort this year...it's a gamble due to term. Seattle escapes Grubauer's bad year and adds the quality of Kerfoot and the shortness of Mrazek's term. I'd guess finagling would be required.
Bunting Matthews Nylander
Crouse Tavares Marner
Mikheyev Kampf Engvall
Robertson/Clifford McLeod Spezza/Simmonds
Rielly Brodie
Muzz/Gio Holl/Lubushkin
Gio/Muzz/Sandin Lily/Holl/Lubushkin
Campbell/Grubauer/pick your call-up
If only it were this easy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495f1/495f185fc1f2d2bd459ec9ded3ca2eb67b513d95" alt="laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495f1/495f185fc1f2d2bd459ec9ded3ca2eb67b513d95" alt="laugh :laugh: :laugh:"