GDT: Trade and Free Agency Thread - 2021/22 PART X

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Leafs are spending 5.45 mill on goaltending this year. Colorado is spending 5.5 mill.

Colorado has .928 goaltending at 5-on-5 this year. 2nd in the league. The Leafs have .908. 4th worst in the league.

Vancouver is at the top of the league and they are spending 6.5 mill.

Calgary is spending 6.75 mill on goaltending. Top 5 in the league. St. Louis is spending the same: 6th. The Rangers are spending 8 mill but their 2.5 mill backup has been subpar for years and probably could be upgraded with someone making half the amount. Top 5.

Bruins are spending 5.9 mill. Middle of the pack. Only slightly worse than Florida, who is spending almost double that. Tampa is near the top in the league in spending on goaltending and they are only at the high end of the middle tier in terms of goaltending.

So the difference between "cheap goaltending" which is bottom 5 in the league despite playing behind a defense which is playing much better than that is maybe a mill and a half if you really want to splurge? Only 4 goalies in the league make over 6.4 mill (and 2 of them - Fleury and Bobrovsky - are not worth more than 6.4 mill based on their play). Most teams don't spend more than 7 mill on goalies otherwise, and in fact, many of the teams who do are near the bottom with us (Chicago, Columbus, Seattle).

Spending big on goaltending is stupid unless you are paying for a consistent Vezina winner like Vasilevsky.
Last time I checked leafs were like bottom 5 for cap spent for goalies. That includes goalies on cheaper ELCs

Colorado fans have been complaining of goalie performances all year it seems, they also have ARI retaining money on Kuemper so not the greatest example.

The others are better example though majoirty are spending more on their main goalie and closer to 1 million on their backup. Seems like the new strategy is spend bigger on a starter and less on backup.

I'm not saying to spend big on goalies. I'm saying if you cheap out I wouldn't expect that position to be a strength unless you get lucky and lockup a guy like Markstrom, Demko before they explode.
 
People like this cannot be reasoned with.
Yes you’re right mrazek snd soup are
world beaters being let down by awful D. You’re right. That slow roller by Chychrun or the second hinistroza goal are all time world class and he was simply left out to dry.
 
Last time I checked leafs were like bottom 5 for cap spent for goalies. That includes goalies on cheaper ELCs

Colorado fans have been complaining of goalie performances all year it seems, they also have ARI retaining money on Kuemper so not the greatest example.

The others are better example though majoirty are spending more on their main goalie and closer to 1 million on their backup. Seems like the new strategy is spend bigger on a starter and less on backup.

I'm not saying to spend big on goalies. I'm saying if you cheap out I wouldn't expect that position to be a strength unless you get lucky and lockup a guy like Markstrom, Demko before they explode.
Aside from Florida and Tampa they’re within a mill or so of every other playoff team in terms of goalie spending. Keep pushing false narratives though
 
Clearly you are on to something. If only we were like that highest spending team in goaltending, the Montreal Canadiens, the team last in the league in goals against then we'd find success right? Or Kraken at #4, or Islanders at #5, Hawks at #7, Ducks at #8... . Or maybe you are ranting about something with zero correlation??

Then again, you look at league leaders, such as Carolina, who barely spends more on goalies than us, or Colorado, who doesn't spend more than us...
Well that was needlessly snarky as f*** and rude...... all I was saying is if you spend bottom 5 in goalies in the league without any ELC guys performing i wouldn't expect goaltending to be a strength.
 
Yes you’re right mrazek snd soup are
world beaters being let down by awful D. You’re right. That slow roller by Chychrun or the second hinistroza goal are all time world class and he was simply left out to dry.
I did not say that, nor did I dispute that the goaltending is terrible. The difference is that you have no interest in unpacking the whole issue, you are just dead set on blaming everything on goaltending, and that is not conducive to a productive conversation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ToneDog
I’m convinced there’s a group here who would be okay seeing the team lose every game as long as they goon it up and partake in the post whistle fake toughness garbage
I believe that you believe that. It's kind of on-brand for you from what I have gathered reading your posts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ToneDog
When you have left the drain plug on your boat open and launch it, do you find more/stronger/fitter people to bail the boat each time you go out, or do you try replacing the drain plug first?

Fix the goalies first and you mostly fix the D.

Goalie and D work synergy. With plays on ice affecting G the most.

And cap limit. Can't fix all.

Easier path is fix D. Hockey is played on ice not on stat sheet. Fixing D affect how actual game play out. Defence mean to prevent. So if you help the D problem, there is also increase in goaltending even though you didn't change goalies because on ice outcomes now all change too. This no measured in stats

Reverse is not correct. If you fix the goalie, you don't fix any D. Mental theory that D suck being mental stress from goalie is very cheap theory. Now you still have to go spend asset on D because the play on ice in front goalie is still same.

Boat example not too nice. Boat example only work in no cap world where you have freedom to do all. This more complex you need to take path that maximize what you fix.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DraftSchmaft
I did not say that, nor did I dispute that the goaltending is terrible. The difference is that you have no interest in unpacking the whole issue, you are just dead set on blaming everything on goaltending, and that is not conducive to a productive conversation.
There’s nothing to unpack unless they can get reasonable goaltending.
When they got decent metminding they were solid in their own zone. That’s with muzzin & holl not being very good and without boosh. A healthy muzz, a fixed holl and added boosh makes me less concerned about the back end and with a week until the deadline there’s only so much that can be “fixed”
No one other additions will make a lick of difference if the goaltending isn’t straightened out
 
Leafs and Islanders have been scouting each other's games.
Varlamov is my guy. Should be cheaper than Fleury
 
That they cheaped out in net.

$8m but their 2.5m back up could be replaced with a league minimum guy and it wouldn’t change their outlook
They spent like bottom 5 in goalie cap hits. Not a narrative that they did spend less than their peers, its a fact. If that correlates to strong goalie performance is 100% debatable but the fact they spent less on goalies than their peers is not
 
Varly + mayfield for mrazek + dermott + non roster futures (debate what that would be)
Everyone’s happy
Leafs and Islanders have been scouting each other's games.
Varlamov is my guy. Should be cheaper than Fleury
 
Last time I checked leafs were like bottom 5 for cap spent for goalies. That includes goalies on cheaper ELCs

Colorado fans have been complaining of goalie performances all year it seems, they also have ARI retaining money on Kuemper so not the greatest example.

The others are better example though majoirty are spending more on their main goalie and closer to 1 million on their backup. Seems like the new strategy is spend bigger on a starter and less on backup.

I'm not saying to spend big on goalies. I'm saying if you cheap out I wouldn't expect that position to be a strength unless you get lucky and lockup a guy like Markstrom, Demko before they explode.

Colorado is complaining about goaltending yet they have some of the highest save percentages in the league? Seems odd.

We are right in the middle of the league, and if we spend another mill, we are in the top 10. Would an extra mill fix our goaltending? If so, not that hard to open up that room right now and get it fixed (i.e. with Varlamov, who makes just over a mill more than Mrazek on the cap).

So we are not "cheaping out". Our goalies just aren't earning their money right now. If they earned their money, we would be doing more than fine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad