Kurtz
Registered User
- Jul 17, 2005
- 10,544
- 7,817
I was talking about Chychrun though
Oh...I don't think even Arizona fans watch those games
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495f1/495f185fc1f2d2bd459ec9ded3ca2eb67b513d95" alt="laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
I was talking about Chychrun though
Oh...I don't think even Arizona fans watch those games![]()
Schenn couldnt skate at the NHL level when we drafted him, he may have learned how to be a #6 D-man, but, thats all he'll ever be, and to slow the growth of our future D on him would be a mistake. ...i still remember seeing the Pietro jersey under their draft table, i guess they were hoping he'd dropI wasn't overly impressed by Severson's game in general TBH. -1 on the night, Bad penalty in the 2nd period, and probably the worst play of a 2 on 1 I have ever seen in my entire life.
I know he is better than what he showed last night, but that was a very poor performance from Severson. Thought he was noticeably bad.
But then again, there are times Muzzin is noticeably bad and then we are reminded very quickly in his absence how terrible we are in front of our own net without him in the lineup.
Not sure what the price would be for Severson, but I honestly don't think he is a player that would be worth the price tag. I genuinely think we can get a much cheaper option, retain our first round pick and/or top prospect and improve our net front D through another player. Our net front D has been what is lacking. That player's name is Luke Schenn.
It's not always about landing the big fish year over year. I'd much rather let Dubas and his scouting staff select in the 1st round for a change and try and land that big fish a couple years from now through the 2022 draft.
Luke Schenn would immensely help our net front D, and could likely be had for Dermott straight up. Cap savings for 2 seasons, and we get a more reliable version of Dermott who can actually clear the house and keeps things simple.
Not as sexy, but every bit as effective IMO.
But why would we want a dman who sucks defensively and comes with a $4.2 mil cap hit to boot?
Schenn has actually aged quite well after his career was seemingly on life support 4-5 years ago.Schenn couldnt skate at the NHL level when we drafted him, he may have learned how to be a #6 D-man, but, thats all he'll ever be, and to slow the growth of our future D on him would be a mistake. ...i still remember seeing the Pietro jersey under their draft table, I guess they were hoping he'd drop
To be fair, Rielly was bad defensively. This year he has improved.Because that means we could dump Ritchie and/or Holl/Dermott in the process, and gain someone with good defensive metrics? He's been playing 25+ minutes and against top opponents. He's done well. Now imagine that on the 2nd pairing.
HFBoards posters also say Rielly sucks defensively.
with the new yesterday, call me crazy but i think an unrated move would be to get petry at 50% retained. 3 years at 3mil would be pretty insane for a 23min , 40+ point 150+ hits per season guy (who is still very good defensivly. I dont think the pricetag will be as high as a klingberg for example and he has got term on a very moveable contract if he wants to go back to the states. if we are going down the road of non rental players id take petry over severson every time
before people say hes washed up, hes a + player in regular situations (non empty net and PP situations) on the worst team in the league. Just last year he finished top 12 in norris voting.
Plus i can see a good fit especially when it comes to late game situations when you need some offense. Reilly and petry together can provide offense..... having brodie, holl liligren manson serverson or whoever on that right side wont be able to provide that.
Perfect depth. He's probably better as #7 option but thata fine. If he's your depth addition, thats fine by me.Schenn has actually aged quite well after his career was seemingly on life support 4-5 years ago.
He is a Stanley Cup winner, plays hard and heavy minutes, makes next to nothing, can occasionally be used higher in the lineup for a game or 2. He's always been a safer player that lacked mobility, but he's really dialed it in the last couple seasons IMO.
Being that I am from Vancouver I've actually got to see a decent amount of his games this year in person and on TV. He is better than Tyler Meyers, which I know is not saying much, but he absolutely belongs in the NHL.
It's not just me, all my friends are Canucks fans, and they love what he brings to the table. He makes 850K this year and next, and could be had for next to nothing. Right shot D with size, snarl, and an awareness to play within his skillset.
It kind of reminds me when we got Bogo. I know I had this preconceived idea that he was the offensive defensemen that clearly regressed after leaving WPG, but when we got him I was shocked at how good he still was, especially in his own end. We need a Bogo 2.0 IMO. Schenn fits the bill
Schenn has actually aged quite well after his career was seemingly on life support 4-5 years ago.
He is a Stanley Cup winner, plays hard and heavy minutes, makes next to nothing, can occasionally be used higher in the lineup for a game or 2. He's always been a safer player that lacked mobility, but he's really dialed it in the last couple seasons IMO.
Being that I am from Vancouver I've actually got to see a decent amount of his games this year in person and on TV. He is better than Tyler Meyers, which I know is not saying much, but he absolutely belongs in the NHL.
It's not just me, all my friends are Canucks fans, and they love what he brings to the table. He makes 850K this year and next, and could be had for next to nothing. Right shot D with size, snarl, and an awareness to play within his skillset.
It kind of reminds me when we got Bogo. I know I had this preconceived idea that he was the offensive defensemen that clearly regressed after leaving WPG, but when we got him I was shocked at how good he still was, especially in his own end. We need a Bogo 2.0 IMO. Schenn fits the bill
I think more in the sense of Schenn being depth. He obviously shouldn't be our main addition.But can we depend on Liljegren/Muzzin pairing at the second pairing shut down pair?
I feel like we need someone who can stand on their own, if Muzzin goes down again in the playoffs. Nothing against Schenn... I just don't like the lineup, if Muzzin's out, and Schenn's our acquisition. I think we need to upgrade the second pair.
I think more in the sense of Schenn being depth. He obviously shouldn't be our main addition.
with the new yesterday, call me crazy but i think an unrated move would be to get petry at 50% retained. 3 years at 3mil would be pretty insane for a 23min , 40+ point 150+ hits per season guy (who is still very good defensivly. I dont think the pricetag will be as high as a klingberg for example and he has got term on a very moveable contract if he wants to go back to the states. if we are going down the road of non rental players id take petry over severson every time
before people say hes washed up, hes a + player in regular situations (non empty net and PP situations) on the worst team in the league. Just last year he finished top 12 in norris voting.
Plus i can see a good fit especially when it comes to late game situations when you need some offense. Reilly and petry together can provide offense..... having brodie, holl liligren manson serverson or whoever on that right side wont be able to provide that.
I mean Luke Schenn has played a lot of time with Quinn Hughes this year. They've put him in that Chris Tanev babysitting role and he has done very well IMO.But can we depend on Liljegren/Muzzin pairing at the second pairing shut down pair?
I feel like we need someone who can stand on their own, if Muzzin goes down again in the playoffs. Nothing against Schenn... I just don't like the lineup, if Muzzin's out, and Schenn's our acquisition. I think we need to upgrade the second pair.
As a #7, I'm ok with that... Dermott and Holl out... Schenn + 2nd pairing RD in.
Because that means we could dump Ritchie and/or Holl/Dermott in the process, and gain someone with good defensive metrics? He's been playing 25+ minutes and against top opponents. He's done well. Now imagine that on the 2nd pairing.
HFBoards posters also say Rielly sucks defensively.
Can't we just trust our GM to know this when obtaining a player?But we can dump those guys in a deal for a more physical/better defensive dman. Severson seems more of a need for a team like NYI who are desperate for a dman who can move the puck a little. That's not our primary need.
I'm inclined to trust the opinions of Hf posters for whom the player plays. Avs fans told us that Barrie sucked defensively for example - sure enough he turned out to be awful. Calgary fans told us that Brodie was a hidden gem - sure enough, that turned out to be true too.
What about Adam Larsson? I’ll admit I haven’t watched the Kraken at all this season.
Larsson with 50% retention for Ritchie + 1st?
But we can dump those guys in a deal for a more physical/better defensive dman. Severson seems more of a need for a team like NYI who are desperate for a dman who can move the puck a little. That's not our primary need.
I'm inclined to trust the opinions of Hf posters for whom the player plays. Avs fans told us that Barrie sucked defensively for example - sure enough he turned out to be awful. Calgary fans told us that Brodie was a hidden gem - sure enough, that turned out to be true too.
Can't we just trust our GM to know this when obtaining a player?
I’d take Larsson in a heart beat but he makes decent money in the $4 million plus range. So not sure how to make that work unless you kick Muzzin to the curb.
Has he improved? I can always tell it's him, by how he backs up off the line and allows the easiest entry to the opposition. He then moves to the net, giving up the entire wall and pass lanes. He does it nearly every time. without. fail.To be fair, Rielly was bad defensively. This year he has improved.
But we can dump those guys in a deal for a more physical/better defensive dman. Severson seems more of a need for a team like NYI who are desperate for a dman who can move the puck a little. That's not our primary need.
I'm inclined to trust the opinions of Hf posters for whom the player plays. Avs fans told us that Barrie sucked defensively for example - sure enough he turned out to be awful. Calgary fans told us that Brodie was a hidden gem - sure enough, that turned out to be true too.