Judas Tavares
S2S (Sundin2Sandin)
- Feb 9, 2007
- 10,188
- 3,632
Washington is a team I look at in terms of a team that had a foundation/core but took forever to win. Starting from the first year they were competitive until the year they won the Cup, in the 1st round they drafted:Teams like Pittsburgh, Tampa and Washington don't always trade their 1st and they've had success at some point to make you feel about expending the assets. We're talking literally 0-5 in 1st round now, if you count CBJ as a playoff round
Washington
Boston x2
Columbus
Montreal
The opponents have arguably gotten easier but we've not managed to win a damn thing despite multiple 1sts and prospects being expended, sometimes not going big at the deadline is okay too.
I did take a look though;
Washington
2021 they made a bad trade for Mantha, using Vrana, 1st, 2nd and Panik to do it. Arguably Panik was a cap dump but not a strong endorsement for going big.
In 2020 they gave up a 2nd and 3rd for Dillon and a 3rd for Kovalchuk. Dillon is kind of forgivable but that Kovalchuk deal wasn't so good lol.
Nothing notable in 2019
In 2018 when they won a cup, they just used a 3rd for Kempny after being burned the year before on the Shattenkirk acquisition which was a 1st and Sandford.
Tampa
They have recently went for it with 1sts going for Savard, Coleman and Goodrow.
2019 though? Just traded a 5th and Koekkoek (kinda trending towards bust/replacement level) for Rutta who also wasn't clicking in Chicago.
2018? McDonagh (had an extra year+extended) and JT Miller (extended+team control) for 1st, Namestnikov, Howden, Hajek, 2nd round pick, costly but didn't lose the trade.
2017 - Actually sold because of injuries, they got a 2nd from us for Boyle.
Pittsburgh
2021 - Carter for a 3rd...good deal.
2020 - 1st, Addison, Galchenyuk for Zucker...thought the deal seemed better at the time, Zucker hasn't fit in as well
3rd for Marleau, Kahun for Rodrigues and Sheary
2019 - Gudbranson came in for Pearson
Bjugstad and McCann came in for Brassard, Sheahan, 2nd and 2 4ths...honestly don't think that was worth it
Sold Oleksiak for a 4th
I'll leave it to you to determine how many playoff series each team won the in the last 5 years, I would be much less resistant if we had a single round win under our belts.
Carlson
Johansson
Kuznetsov
Forsberg
Wilson
Burakovsky
Vrana
Samsonov
Johansen
Alekseyev
From 2008-2018, only in 2011 and 2017 did they not have a 1st. The players in bold were key in helping the Caps win. The players in italics are still with the organization and haven't been used to make make a big splash. Johansson looks to have been traded as a cap casualty for picks before their Cup. Forsberg was foolishly traded for Erat.
What we see here is a team that got successful with a very young core (Ovechkin, Backstrom, Semin, Green, Alzner, Varlamov) that were successful in the regular season and while they won some playoff series, they still disappointed in the playoffs. Their kryptonite happened to be a bit better than ours, as it was the second round, rather than the first. They never got past the second round til they won their Cup. But they identified parts of their core that weren't working and later was able to replace them with younger players and prospects that they kept rather than trading.
For example
Semin --> Kuznetsov
Green --> Carlson
Varlamov --> Holtby
They added to this core as they went (while failing) with guys like Wilson, Burakovsky and Vrana.
There are teams who push their chips in, but Washington was not one of them. They believed in their core, added and replaced and then eventually got there.
Tampa is sort of another example as well, starting with Stamkos and Hedman and eventually adding guys like Kucherov, Palat, Vas, Point etc... down the line. Tough example though as their drafting and developing are freakishly good. But similar in that they identified the main part of their core and continuously added to it.
If the Leafs bomb out again and need to shake up their core, well then maybe the Amirovs, Knies', Robertsons of the world will be the ones added to the remaining core to help form a more successful core. Not against trading some of these top prospects here and there when the right deal presents itself. But going all in every year is not the way to go.