Why would they move mrazek when they’re going to need two capable goalies down the stretch? They’ve been lucky to ride Campbell as much as they so far without an issue. Off-season is entirely different.
Ritchie would make sense to go back in any deal where salary ballast needs to be included, I see that happening.
I think the main target now has to be a depth defenseman. With how poorly Muzzy played the last few games and now losing him to a concussion, we certainly can't roll a bottom4 of Biega, Dermott, Holl, Sandin and Lilly into the playoffs. I have a lot of confidence in Lilly and Sandin but the others, not so much.
We're going to need 2 goalies this season and playoffs. Trading Petr is not an option. We can't play Woll/Hutch for 25+ games and heaven forbid a playoff start for either
I think the main target now has to be a depth defenseman. With how poorly Muzzy played the last few games and now losing him to a concussion, we certainly can't roll a bottom4 of Biega, Dermott, Holl, Sandin and Lilly into the playoffs. I have a lot of confidence in Lilly and Sandin but the others, not so much.
I wonder what the cost would be to move Ritchie.
If you're patient I don't think you would have to attach anything to Ritchie to move him. His contract isn't really that expensive, even in a 4th line role where he gets you 20 points. It's only 2.5M and there is one extra season. He's in his mid-20's. At the deadline with less money owed on his deal there may be a team willing to pay the Leafs for his services, not the other way around. In the off-season, with UFA's going for overpriced contracts and other contracts coming off the books for other teams, they should be able to offload that contract.I wonder what the cost would be to move Ritchie.
Not worth it; but if performs in the playoffs it may be easier. He's owed more next year......eeesh
I think the main target now has to be a depth defenseman. With how poorly Muzzy played the last few games and now losing him to a concussion, we certainly can't roll a bottom4 of Biega, Dermott, Holl, Sandin and Lilly into the playoffs. I have a lot of confidence in Lilly and Sandin but the others, not so much.
Can he be Kucheroved till the end of the regular season if he's really not healthy?
Mainly the point above, however, there's also the aspect of trading a player you just signed without giving him a chance to prove himself would send a bad message to prospective FA's.
To me, Holl and Richie would be my prime targets for trading in order to free up cap space. Maybe Kerfoot, but I think he's more of a off season move. He's proved to be a very good, albeit relatively expensive, utility forward.
It would be tricky, but IIRC technically we could for as long as we weren't use any of the space and below the baseline set on the day we deactivated him.Yes, but we would not be accruing any more cap space.
Yes, but we would not be accruing any more cap space.
I think if you look at pretty much every contract signed since Covid you’ll see lower payout in these recovery years. Pretty much every new deal is middle loaded so guys avoid escrow.Not worth it; but if performs in the playoffs it may be easier. He's owed more next year......eeesh
Can Rasmus Ristolainen play hockey any good anymore, would he be a upgrade on Holl playing beside Muzzin?
6.4ft, on an expiring contract at the end of the year, cap hit right now is 5.4m so would be a 2.7m cap hit if Philly retained. Don't think it would cost an arm and a leg like other d-man out there.
No. He never was very good. Outside of some pretty good checks, and as a PP specialist.