Proposal: Tor <---> mtl

Michel Beauchamp

Canadiens' fan since 1958
Mar 17, 2008
23,299
3,393
Laval, Qc
Oh right cuz Brown (only 2 points), Kapanen (similar AHL production), Hyman (terrible production despite being a lot older and top line minutes), Sosh (hasnt proved anything) would all be FIRMLY ahead?? Plz be realistic. Dermott and Nielsen are both Ds, why bring them up to compare them?

That was immediately followed by :

Juulsen will soon be better than JVR in terms of their position.

That tickled my funny bone... ;)

Especially with that avatar.
 

Michel Beauchamp

Canadiens' fan since 1958
Mar 17, 2008
23,299
3,393
Laval, Qc
Actually, I was referring to the long line of idiot signings Bergevin has done.
As for drama, I didn't notice any before other than the coach using PK as a scapegoat for his own screw ups and the sideways looks from Captain Invisible, which I personally would have smacked off his face

Ladies and gentlemen, we have here a prime specimen of a keyboard warrior.

Horrible pickups/signings/trades: Byron, Mitchell, Radulov, Petry, Weber, Danault.

The beat goes on...

 

lifelonghockeyfan

Registered User
Dec 18, 2015
6,283
1,357
Lake Huron
There is absolutely no reason for Toronto to do this. Jvr and bozak allow everyone else on the leafs to currently to slot into appropriate roles and because of that our young players have been great and developing nicely. Nice prospects from Montreal but they are less important to Toronto then this year's development of their own top rookies.

Well said. Bozak has been very important in the development of Marner. Leafs aren't deep at centre, and Bozak needed this year. Maybe next year at TDL he's available.

Regarding rebuilding, yes the Leafs might get some long term value from a trade like this, but it's still important to building a winning team (maybe 20th overall) this year and maybe a playoff in the spring 2018, then endless...trading for the future.
 

LV*

Free my bro Leivo
Aug 26, 2012
11,559
10
Toronto
In a world where he doesn't fit in our lineup. The **** would we do with him?

Idk nor do I care. Maybe you should read the OP "Bozak + Hunwick for capdump + 2nd".

Bozak = 2nd, Hunwick isnt a capdump... So how does that work?
 

Legend123

Registered User
Jul 3, 2016
9,926
5,112
Idk nor do I care. Maybe you should read the OP "Bozak + Hunwick for capdump + 2nd".

Bozak = 2nd, Hunwick isnt a capdump... So how does that work?

Hunwick is a cap dump in every sense of the world. Money wasted on a 9th D
 

sansabri

hello my enemies
Aug 12, 2005
32,572
8,487
Idk nor do I care. Maybe you should read the OP "Bozak + Hunwick for capdump + 2nd".

Bozak = 2nd, Hunwick isnt a capdump... So how does that work?

He's not a cap dump to you only because you have lots of room left on your cap.

He'd be a cap dump to us. Understand how this works?
 

LV*

Free my bro Leivo
Aug 26, 2012
11,559
10
Toronto
Hunwick is a cap dump in every sense of the world. Money wasted on a 9th D

He's not a cap dump to you only because you have lots of room left on your cap.

He'd be a cap dump to us. Understand how this works?

Sure.

I just dont think 1.2M justifies being called a capdump, especially when you could save 900 (or 925k) by sending him to the AHL :laugh:
 

sansabri

hello my enemies
Aug 12, 2005
32,572
8,487
Sure.

I just dont think 1.2M justifies being called a capdump, especially when you could save 900 (or 925k) by sending him to the AHL :laugh:

Yeah, ok. Maybe when you're competing for a cup you'll understand why every penny counts.
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
Sure.

I just dont think 1.2M justifies being called a capdump, especially when you could save 900 (or 925k) by sending him to the AHL :laugh:

they are well know leaf trolls. no point even going back and forth.
they think JVR is wroth a 2nd, sergachev> any of the big leafs 3 etc.

I still don't know how a 1.2 mil guy is a cap dump. 250k hit if buried...lol
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
what about

TO MTL: Kadri, JVR, Soshnikov & Polak ($11,925,000)

To TOR: Emelin, Desharnais, McCarron, Juulsen, 1st in 2017 (MTL) & 2nd in 2017 or 2018 (MTL) ($7,600,000 in active salary + $2,170,000 in non NHL Roster players)


Tor can also retain some salary to even the cap situation out roguhly $4,325,000 added to MTL in this deal - $1,500,000 in current cap space = $2,825,000 that needs to be shed and or retained from TOR deal to make it work cap wise


Pacioretty / Galchenyuk / Radulov
JVR / Plekanec / Gallagher
Soshnikov / Kadri / Shaw
Byron / Mitchell / Flynn or Danault or Carr or Andrighetto

Markov / Weber
Beaulieu / Petry
Pateryn or Hanley or Redmond / Polak

Price / Montoya

yeah this offer doesnt do anything for us.
Mccarron/Juulsen + that 1st probably gets you JVR. leafs could also take on DD for another sweetner.

Juulsen, DD, 1st,2nd for JVR, Holl
 

Funk21

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
4,393
1,899
Toronto
:habs

Nikita Scherbak ($863,333)
David Descharnais ($3,500,000)
Alexei Emelin ($4,100,000)
Noah Juulsen ($894,167)
1st 2017
2nd 2018

Salary Total: $9.35m
:leafs

Tyler Bozak ($4,200,000)
JVR ($4,250,000)
Matt Hunwick ($1,200,000) or Jhonas Enroth (replace montoya ;) )
Salary Total: $9,65m


Summary:

I think this package like this.

JVR = Scherbak, Juulsen & 1st + cap dump
Bozak & Hunwick = Cap Dump & 2nd 2018

Why would TML do this ?

Continue the rebuild and get IMO good prices on both players who are not considered buildin blocks in the future. Might have to ask a lil more from mtl but still i would like it. Only real problem in it is 49/50 contracts atm ´but we could throw in a ahl'er. 1st isnt gonna be to high, but first is a first and I might be in a minority here, but i think we (tml) are far away from ready with the painful part of the rebuild.
This would make us weaker no doubt but would give us much needed tools in the future with Juulsen and Scherbak and a first and a second. Of course I wouldnt take Eme or DD but its a must take situation to get other parts.


Why would MTL do this:

Cuz they are in a "win now" mode. They would get a nice upgrade to their scorin with jvr for 2yrs and a very good c to their second or third line with a marvellous faceoff skills. Both are worth the salaries easily and JVR is a very good contract. Hunwick to balance the salaries. I think with those names ya would have better chance to fight for the cup.

**If I'm way outta the line with values I apologize**
And NOOOOW ITS TIIIIIMMMMMEEEEE TO Bash this to the ground :laugh:

You are way out of line!!!

Look if we are giving up JVR and Bozak then Sergachev is coming back to us its as simple as that. While Emelin is certainly better than hunwick if I am not mistaken he has another year at a pretty bad cap hit which means he gets exposed and likely picked up by LV.

As for the picks its basically second and a third rounders because with JVR and Bozak you have yourself a likely SC champion. Yes they will be officially a first and second but because of their position not.

Juulsen is a concussion away from being a memory and Scherbak is meh at best, Kappenen has more potential.

Please don't even get me started with Diamond Dave.

Sorry bud this proposal is terrible, its starts with Sergachev and likely your 2017 first.
 

Funk21

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
4,393
1,899
Toronto
what about

TO MTL: Kadri, JVR, Soshnikov & Polak ($11,925,000)

To TOR: Emelin, Desharnais, McCarron, Juulsen, 1st in 2017 (MTL) & 2nd in 2017 or 2018 (MTL) ($7,600,000 in active salary + $2,170,000 in non NHL Roster players)


Tor can also retain some salary to even the cap situation out roguhly $4,325,000 added to MTL in this deal - $1,500,000 in current cap space = $2,825,000 that needs to be shed and or retained from TOR deal to make it work cap wise


Pacioretty / Galchenyuk / Radulov
JVR / Plekanec / Gallagher
Soshnikov / Kadri / Shaw
Byron / Mitchell / Flynn or Danault or Carr or Andrighetto

Markov / Weber
Beaulieu / Petry
Pateryn or Hanley or Redmond / Polak

Price / Montoya

Worst than the first!
 

Drydenwasthebest

Registered User
Jun 16, 2009
5,227
0
A placeholder for us, he's still a career 50pt centre who's a very good faceoff guy. There's defensive concerns, but moved to RW I think he could be very useful and hide some of the warts, surprised we haven't tried.

Anyway ya which contract we took back probably wouldn't matter, I'd probably do DD+2nd+3rd for Bozak+4th

Actually, if Bozak, who has never hit 50 points once in a season is a "career 50 puts centre", then Desharnais must be a career 60 points centre. We have zero use for BoZak. Danault can do what Bozak does, and is better defensively.

Sending Emelin, who has started playing the way he was before the Lucic injury, away to pick up a third line centre with defensive issues when we have a coach who will not play guys with defensive issues unless they are named Desharnais. Bozak adds NOTHING of any significance to our team that makes him worth a 4.2 million dollar cap hit.

DD and a 3rd for Bozak and a 4th is still not worth it because Bozak has the higher cap hit without significantly doing anything to improve our team. DD is a cheaper placeholder, there is no need to pay to get another placeholder who is more expensive.
 

Drydenwasthebest

Registered User
Jun 16, 2009
5,227
0
Hey you called him the placeholder first. Lol done deal tho. Bozak and a fourth for desharnais, a 2nd and a third.

A Leafs fan called Bozak a placeholder because, AT BEST, that is exactly what he is. We do not need that type of player when we have internal options like Danault or even bloody Desharnais. Therrien would lose his temper with Bozak pretty quickly due to his defensive deficiencies and we would have a 4.2 million dollar cap hit sitting on the bench instead of a 3.5 million dollar one AND we would have lost 2 good draft picks for the privilege. THAT is your "REALITY". I would rather go out and overpay for bloody Hanzal than for Bozak, and a 2nd + 3rd for Bozak is a serious overpay.

For the sake of "reality", if Bozak is the best we can get for a 2nd and 3rd, give Danault, McCarron or De La Rose the shot they truly need or deserve (depending upon the player in question) to do what Bozak currently does. Bozak is not getting his "career 50 points" playing 3rd line minutes for our team. He got all of those "career 50 points seasons" playing top 6 minutes, something he would not get with Galchenyuk and Plekanec already occupying those positions on our team AND when you realize he is a defensive liability that Therrien would hate it makes this "reality" even worse!!!!

No thanks is as polite as reality allows me to get.
 

hockeyheadlines

Registered User
Oct 9, 2016
1,740
4
Canada
Sergachev would not be included in any talks, period. So we can move on. It's more than unlikely these two teams trade anything except maybe recipes.

Don't expect any bold moves from Bergevin at this time of the year either.
 

sharks9

Registered User
Jan 16, 2012
16,444
2,604
Canada
Horrible value for Montreal

In what universe is JVR worth 3 first-round picks? He's worth 1 and a 2nd at the deadline this year. Also Hunwick's a terrible defenseman and I don't want him anywhere near the Canadiens
 

HoweHullOrr

Registered User
Oct 3, 2013
11,899
2,386
yeah this offer doesnt do anything for us.
Mccarron/Juulsen + that 1st probably gets you JVR. leafs could also take on DD for another sweetner.

Juulsen, DD, 1st, 2nd for JVR, Holland

JVR is our (nation's) favourite trading chip, and hence is often overvalued in these (nation's) trade proposals.

Legend:

Bolding is to emphasize the essentials after non-essentials/distractions are removed.
 

HuGo Sham

MR. CLEAN-up ©Runner77
Apr 7, 2010
28,773
21,223
Montreal
yeah this offer doesnt do anything for us.
Mccarron/Juulsen + that 1st probably gets you JVR. leafs could also take on DD for another sweetner.

Juulsen, DD, 1st,2nd for JVR, Holl

lolz 2 or 3 firsts / prospects 'maybe' gets you JVR.

keep him
:yo:
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad