Kerry Fraser should not be on any list of top referees because, while he largely did his job well enough and competently, he also occasionally (but often enough to notice) got into personal grudges, mid-game, against a particular team, calling 7 or 8 penalties in a row against them and apparently intending to 'send a message' to the coach or team that HE WAS THE BIG BOSS.
This kind of referee cannot be considered the best, in my opinion.
The best referees are the ones we don't notice.
This is why I don't like Fraser, but considering most of the guys that were his contemporaries were also like that, his strengths separated him from them. I once saw Mark Faucette call a phantom penalty on a home player in response to something
a guy in the crowd said to him through the photographer hole. Guys chirped him. He turned around, looked him in the eye, looked back at the play, put his hand up immediately, blew the whistle, turned around and stared him down. Fraser wasn't
that petty.
I mean, he wouldn't badly, emphatically botch a call, then kick you out of the game for arguing with him. I saw that from McGeough more than once. Nor was he a slot machine like Devorski, where there was no way of knowing what was a penalty or not. He didn't lose control of games like Koharski. Or cheat the rulebook to favor players who played a style he liked, like Stewart.
Fraser had a big ego and wasn't perfect, but he at least meant well, had a good eye and at bare minimum, you could count on him to not butcher the game.
He's not McCreary or McCauley, but he still stands out as a big, big positive compared to his peers. I was almost always relieved to see his name in the program. Unfortunately, Fraser's peers were, almost to a man, impossible not to notice.