- Jul 26, 2010
- 31,034
- 14,624
I am interested in debating about the greatest offensive defensemen , maybe we could start with some lists then debate some specific points.
I'll make my list later today.
I'll make my list later today.
Orr
Coffey
Kelly
Bourque
Potvin
Shore
Fetisov
Leetch
MacInnis
Lidstrom
Can 7 of the 10 greatest offensive dman come from basically the same era?
Kelly at 3rd and Pilote out of this makes no sense to me.
Besides... Kelly revolutionnized the game? Only in that he was a much better offensive player than Quackenbush, Reardon, Harmon or Egan (or others...) -- but it's hardly something Hollett, Shore, Cameron, or even Clancy, didn't pull up before.
Kelly was a bit more consistent from year-2-year, but I really think Pilote isn't far behind for his 3-4 VERY good seasons from an offence perspective.
IMO Harvey ranks up there with the best, maybe top 5. He was one of the few, if not the only, rushing defense man of his era. Aside from Kelly, that's a long stretch of time between Shore and Orr. He also had the ability to control the tempo of the game. Coffey or MacInnis did not possess this quality among their other fine skills.
Orr
Harvey
Coffey
Potvin
Shore
Bourque
Leetch
Robinson
Lidstrom
Kelly
IMO Harvey ranks up there with the best, maybe top 5. He was one of the few, if not the only, rushing defense man of his era. Aside from Kelly, that's a long stretch of time between Shore and Orr. He also had the ability to control the tempo of the game. Coffey or MacInnis did not possess this quality among their other fine skills.
Orr
Harvey
Coffey
Potvin
Shore
Bourque
Leetch
Robinson
Lidstrom
Kelly
No Mark Howe anywhere?
1. Orr
2. Coffey
3. Kelly
4. Shore
5. Potvin
6. Bourque
7. Pilote
8. Leetch
9. MacInnis
10. Gadsby/Park (too tough to tell them apart)
HMs: Lidstrom, Harvey, Clancy.
Fetisov and Suchy are the Europeans (hard to tell how they compare to North Americans). And there are Cleghorn, Cameron, and Boucher from the early era.
I know from the Top 60 Defensemen project that you rank Bourque a decent amount ahead of Potvin...is he really that much better defensively to make up for an offensive edge Potvin has? My thoughts on these two are that when you look at peak or short prime they are relatively close, but Bourque's incredible longevity puts him ahead (comfortably). I can see ranking Potvin ahead offensively when talking peak or short prime, but was he really that much better to make up for all those extra elite seasons Bourque has offensively?
I guess I mentally separated offense, defense, and durability/consistency when I rated Potvin ahead of Bourque offensively (same thing with Leetch/MacInnis). Bourque easily beats Potvin in durability and consistency.
1. Orr
2. Coffey
3. Kelly
4. Shore
5. Potvin
6. Bourque
7. Pilote
8. Leetch
9. MacInnis
10. Gadsby/Park (too tough to tell them apart)
HMs: Lidstrom, Harvey, Clancy.
Fetisov and Suchy are the Europeans (hard to tell how they compare to North Americans). And there are Cleghorn, Cameron, and Boucher from the early era.
No Mark Howe anywhere?