Anttiup32
Registered User
- Jan 29, 2018
- 85
- 50
The old ones got destroyed by people complaining about his personal opinions/past. Please only comments about the on-ice DeAngelo.
He looks much more driven than earlier in the season. I think he knows this is his last shot to prove he deserves an NHL roster spot, and he's desperate to prove it. Definitely think he's on his way to doing exactly that
Subtract Holden at the deadline and there is room, but one of Shattenkirk/ADA has to play with McD if he's still here.
We'll see if Shattenkirk even comes back this season. The team may just shut him down if they go into free fall-firesale mode.
I’d play him with Skjei and work on that being a balanced pair moving forward. Make Skjei stop this riverboat gambler role that they have him playing and let him get back to playing defense. That pairing has some serious wheels and can be really useful at pressuring on both ends of the ice
Thats not my point.
I'm not talking about having a spot available among the 6, I'm talking about deployment. Shattenkirk and DeAngelo play the same role. Is there room for two of the same role on one side?
How's this a problem unless you mess up D-pairing? 3 spots on the right side and we are talking 2 defensemen? The team would need a 3rd righty to be able to play PK and more defensive situations but that shouldn't be a big deal.
Shattenkirk is signed for 3 (not 6) more years after this one and doesn't have a full NMC. And we really haven't seen a real Shattenkirk this season, except for maybe 2-3 week period early on.
His offense was a fluke like a few smart posters predicted and got vilified for mentioning it as a possibility. He’s always been a good 1-on-1 defender and has the speed to take away space from attacking forwards. That’s impossible to do when you’re always freewheeling it and basically trying to be a 4th forward. They want to make him Werenski, but Werenski’s offensive abilities are so far superior to Skjei’s that they basically shoot into orbit.I still think Skjei can be a good player but he had 27 points in 109 games for the U.
He really needs to not with thinking he's Brent Burns.
Shattenkirk is for his career 58% ratio of o-zone to d-zone starts. DeAngelo hasn't accumulated enough games to get a sample size, but it should probably be something around that. We'd need a third guy who pretty much has like the hardest deployment in the whole league to get those two players their optimal deployment. And then the left side has to have 3 PK guys.
It can work, but I think its far from ideal for the team long-term to have DeAngelo and Shattenkirk in the same lineup.
Shattenkirk is for his career 58% ratio of o-zone to d-zone starts. DeAngelo hasn't accumulated enough games to get a sample size, but it should probably be something around that. We'd need a third guy who pretty much has like the hardest deployment in the whole league to get those two players their optimal deployment. And then the left side has to have 3 PK guys.
See here is a classic example of where all the fancy stat guys lose a lot of fans. Somehow now it would be a problem having 2 mobile right side puck moving defenseman with top level offensive ability on one team. Huh?
I disagree. Multiple teams have 2 offensive defenseman. The eventual problem would be if/when Sean Day makes it to the NHL. I don’t think he’ll ever be a big penalty killer.
Thats not my point.
I'm not talking about having a spot available among the 6, I'm talking about deployment. Shattenkirk and DeAngelo play the same role. Is there room for two of the same role on one side?
Shattenkirk is for his career 58% ratio of o-zone to d-zone starts. DeAngelo hasn't accumulated enough games to get a sample size, but it should probably be something around that. We'd need a third guy who pretty much has like the hardest deployment in the whole league to get those two players their optimal deployment. And then the left side has to have 3 PK guys.
It can work, but I think its far from ideal for the team long-term to have DeAngelo and Shattenkirk in the same lineup.
Edit
So they are not both right side puck moving mobile defenseman with tons of offense I’ve upside? Shoot I’m sorryI'm not a "fancy stats guy".
This is basic hockey logic. You have 3 spots on a side, two of those need to be heavily sheltered to be effective, its tough to work around. The way you phrased your response is also so dishonest about the abilities of the two players.
It's poor asset management by the GM. You don't bring in Shattenkirk after you trade for DeAngelo as a big piece of the Stepan trade.