lookie lookie, ADA with 5 points. tied with Seth Jones, Lindell, and Heiskanen
He is such a damn good hockey player. 23 years old with RFA status in 2 years. If there ever was a more perfect target for the Left side it would be him. But I dont see any way, shape, or form the Blue Jackets move him.damn, Werenski got a lot of votes. I feel like he is overlooked.
quite literally meaningless after the top 5. Linda Cohn, huge ranger fan and ESPN broadcaster, voted for Tony
Nooooooo......Nooooooooo.......A thousand times NO! Massive overpaymentI'm not one to usually propose trades but how about: ADA, our 1st round pick (#22), Buchenvich for Werenski?
I'm not one to usually propose trades but how about: ADA, our 1st round pick (#22), Buchenvich for Werenski?
I'm not one to usually propose trades but how about: ADA, our 1st round pick (#22), Buchenvich for Werenski?
Because DeAngelo is way better than FoxNorris may be the biggest joke award of them all.
For example, how does TonyD get those votes and Fox gets none? How does he get more votes than Heiskanen, Jones?
FWIW, Theodore is the flavor of the day. Everyone is on his bandwagon. I would like to see a few years of consistent play before his coronation.
I'm not one to usually propose trades but how about: ADA, our 1st round pick (#22), Buchenvich for Werenski?
Is this serious? Please tell me you're trolling.Because DeAngelo is way better than Fox
A good chunk of old timey voters look at points and plus/minus and not much elseNorris may be the biggest joke award of them all.
For example, how does TonyD get those votes and Fox gets none? How does he get more votes than Heiskanen, Jones?
FWIW, Theodore is the flavor of the day. Everyone is on his bandwagon. I would like to see a few years of consistent play before his coronation.
Yes the 4th leading scoring dman in the league is the better player, how is this even a remotely controversial take? LmaoIs this serious? Please tell me you're trolling.
if you look at our young core and if they all become NHL players then our D corp will be so deep, we'll have to trade some players awayHighly unlikely it can be made but it solves our 1LHD problem in a big way with a 23 years star who would pair nicely with Trouba. I love ADA and appreciate his grit too which is in short supply but this trade seems like a no-brainier to me and not an over-payment in any way. Buch is an enigma and it appears we have 4 top line(s) wings without him. 22nd pick is nice but historically is a 50/50 shot at best (even in a strong draft) at getting a good NHL caliber player. If Nils and KAM or Matt R are what they seem to be we could have an awesome young D Corp in two years (like Stars and Lightning), with excellent goal tending and forwards too.
No brainer to trade a 24 year old, 60 point defenseman who plays the right side and a 25 year old 55 point RW (who with some more growth could be 25 goal, 60 point forward) AND a number 1 pick for a defenseman? No thank you. Just DeAngelo for Werenski? Sure. But in no way am i giving up that much in assets to acquire him.Highly unlikely it can be made but it solves our 1LHD problem in a big way with a 23 years star who would pair nicely with Trouba. I love ADA and appreciate his grit too which is in short supply but this trade seems like a no-brainier to me and not an over-payment in any way. Buch is an enigma and it appears we have 4 top line(s) wings without him. 22nd pick is nice but historically is a 50/50 shot at best (even in a strong draft) at getting a good NHL caliber player. If Nils and KAM or Matt R are what they seem to be we could have an awesome young D Corp in two years (like Stars and Lightning), with excellent goal tending and forwards too.
Well, I won't argue with such a ridiculous take. Let's just say we disagree.Yes the 4th leading scoring dman in the league is the better player, how is this even a remotely controversial take? Lmao
I get if you think Fox's ceiling is higher (but I strongly disagree) but it's blatantly obvious DeAngelo was the better player this season
No brainer to trade a 24 year old, 60 point defenseman who plays the right side and a 25 year old 55 point RW (who with some more growth could be 25 goal, 60 point forward) AND a number 1 pick for a defenseman? No thank you. Just DeAngelo for Werenski? Sure. But in no way am i giving up that much in assets to acquire him.
Also, who are the top 4 wings without him? And who are the ones that play the right side?
Nils has not played one second on North American ice, Robertson has not played one second of anywhere besides juniors and Miller has not played one second beyond college. Who knows what they will be like and more importantly where? I do not know much, but I do know that the odds of them replacing what DeAngelo brings offensively is extremely little.
Just using Tony as an example.A good chunk of old timey voters look at points and plus/minus and not much else
But the two people that voted for Tony weren't exactly hockey savants. It's not like McKeznie voted for Tony or anything lol
Posts like this make it hard to take you seriouslyBecause DeAngelo is way better than Fox
Fox did not run what was one of the best power plays in the league (and on the Rangers in maybe 20 years) nearly as well and Fox will in all likelihood be a much better rounded defenseman, he is not and has not shown that he is capable of tilting the ice the way that DeAngelo can. So I guess all depends on what your definition "replace" is.Not that i'm in favor of trading Tony (far from it I'm a big fan) but we have Fox to replace him.