Just curious. Insignificant? A little? A lot? At whose expense would he fit in? Is it at all a difference, really, in your mind?
I think losing Leino is hurting this team a great deal. He's one of the best players on the team in regards to puck possession, the main reason (lack thereof) why this team is terrible. His injury has changed the whole complexity of the team; everyone was assuming a Leino-Grigerenko-Ott third line for the start of the season and who knows how that line would have done?
I think they miss him but you're overstating it a bit.
I mean, the line could have been a failure and it wouldn't make much of a difference, we don't really know. I didn't mean to suggest that it was guaranteed to succeed or that he is the only reason why we are where we are; that's not the case. His presence would have made it easier to go to the more balanced three line approach that you mentioned a few days ago. Regardless, I think it is fair to say that, at the least, the team really misses his puck possession, even if he doesn't do much with it.
Interesting.........I agree.
I also think they miss Tropp. Those two being out injured completely changed the look of this team.
We ended last season with this top 9.
Leino/Roy/Pommer ---> two way line that handled the heavy lifting defensively
Tropp/Hodgson/Vanek
Foligno/Ennis/Stafford
The Hodgson and Ennis lines were essentially 2/3 lines. Neither was truly a clear cut top 6 line. Its abit reason for why they thrived.
This year I thought we were going to see Leino at center with Ott/Pommer as his wingers resuming the role that line had the year before. It would have kept essentially the same top 9 setup from the year before.
But once Tropp/Leino were out of the mix we suddenly had some holes to fill. In desperation they kept Grigs up and re-signed Hecht. Two things unlikely to happen with thsoe two healthy.
Interesting.........
They may have still re-signed Hecht but they certainly weren't going to do both moves if those two were healthy. There wouldn't be room on the roster.
It also cuts down on the likelyhood of 8 dmen which means Brennan would have likely been waived. Again because of roster spots
I agree.
I also think they miss Tropp. Those two being out injured completely changed the look of this team.
We ended last season with this top 9.
Leino/Roy/Pommer ---> two way line that handled the heavy lifting defensively
Tropp/Hodgson/Vanek
Foligno/Ennis/Stafford
The Hodgson and Ennis lines were essentially 2/3 lines. Neither was truly a clear cut top 6 line nor had to handle much defensive work. Its a big reason why they thrived.
This year I thought we were going to see Leino at center with Ott/Pommer as his wingers resuming the role that line had the year before. It would have kept essentially the same top 9 setup from the year before.
But once Tropp/Leino were out of the mix we suddenly had some holes to fill. In desperation they kept Grigs up and re-signed Hecht. Two things unlikely to happen with thsoe two health.
Probably very little. It would have lasted a few games more than likely.everyone was assuming a Leino-Grigerenko-Ott third line for the start of the season and who knows how that line would have done?
Can't buyout a player that's not under contract..I don't think he would have played any differently under ruff. A few bad games and Hecht would have taken his ice time. I still think he and enroth will be the buyout candidates next year. Great point on Tropp. I really liked him last year!
Lack of a true 3rd line defensive center has really hurt this team as well. I wonder what the impact would have been if Arnott was signed instead of Hecht?