Tragedy
Registered User
Shane Prince shares a drink with Filatov somewhere in a Russian barI love how his mention triggers people.
Brannstrom! Brannstrom! BRANNSTROM!
Let's throw in a DA COSTA! for good measure.
Shane Prince shares a drink with Filatov somewhere in a Russian barI love how his mention triggers people.
Brannstrom! Brannstrom! BRANNSTROM!
Let's throw in a DA COSTA! for good measure.
That definitely matches with the eye test, the team has looked lost without Chabot/Jensen on the ice offensively. Chabot has been the teams best player a quarter of the way through the season.
They have been the top pair for the past month and a half.
Looking at those Branny Sandstrom stats, it seems evident from the stats that Brann is the wiser defenceman to spend money on since he is one quarter the cost and just as good if not better. And if thats what the stats suggest, im asking for a 2nd opinion.
When Sandstrom was drafted many were calling him a defensive defenceman. But he was always an all round dman whose great skating was going to surely get him involved in points. Im not expecting him to ever lead all defencemen in points, that's not the strength i thought he was drafted for.
I love how his mention triggers people.
Brannstrom! Brannstrom! BRANNSTROM!
Let's throw in a DA COSTA! for good measure.
It made me laugh thinking of holding on to Branstrom for offence.
I understand hockey, and I understand Branstrom’s value.Why? He's a really skilled guy to have on the 3rd pair.
It is pretty valuable to have a 3rd pair that consistently outplays the other teams depth, and even more so when that player can play higher up in the lineup. Which is exactly what Brannstrom did.
People who don't understand Brannstroms game don't understand hockey IQ imo.
Even now how can anyone still say with a straight face that we don't need a Brannstrom.
Zub is injured, we are playing JBD or Hamonic in the top 4, Chabot will likely get injured. Like the season has already had a bad start but now it might be the nail in the coffin.
Pretty avoidable had we managed to keep Brannstrom.
I understand hockey, and I understand Branstrom’s value.
He’s not a really skilled guy on the third pair. He’s an undersized, defender who isn’t great at defending, can’t box out bigger forwards, and can’t produce any offence. He can transition the puck nicely, and has a heart of a lion, but just isn’t very effective in the position at all.
JBD is a better RD than Branstrom is, and is paid a lot less than he was slated to be paid. Branstrom has been here for years. He has never been a difference maker in any bad season, why do you think he would be this year? You’re the one complaining about rolling back the core, and yet you think Branstrom is going to make a difference?
We don’t need Branstrom on this team in the slightest. He wouldn’t help with anything on D that we need help with. I’m glad he’s found a home in Vancouver as I like the guy and am pulling for him as I do for guys like him and Kelly, but there is limited value and there needs to be a team that has a temporary fit, and that isn’t us anymore, thankfully.
As for your IQ comment, In my opinion, people who are Brady haters don’t understand hockey IQ.
Like I said, I like Bran, but moving on from him was the right play in my opinion. His contract was too high, and he doesn’t bring what we need on the bottom pairing. With a healthy defence he isn’t playing, and at this point in his career he needs to be on a team that has a spot for him.It's all about depth.
Zub is out now and hopefully you are right and JBD, Hamonic, Kleven can do well with more responsibility, otherwise we could have used Brannstrom. Brannstrom has a history of playing well in the top 4 and definitely did move the needle on the bottom pair.
I don't hate Brady I just don't like his defensive effort last few years.
It made me laugh thinking of holding on to Branstrom for offence.