Blue Jays Discussion: The trade deadline has passed. Time to see what this can do (most acquisitions expected to be present Thursday in Minnesota)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
You clearly weren't here on deadline day when that conversation originally started. Basically, Washington doesn't rate our prospects nearly as high as the rest of the industry does (but I believe that the original report was that they would rather have Biggio over Martinez).

That should give you an idea of how little they thought of our prospects if Biggio versus Martinez were an actual conversation.

Management was completely handicapped by their success in dumping prospects who were starting to look like they had a limited path to the big leagues.

It's not even the prospect ranking.

Bichette is an age 24 All-Star who has been a 5 WAR player/162 for his career and has 4 more years of team control. His value is absolutely massive, moreso than any asset included in the Soto deal.

Also they appear to be conflating the assets that SD paid for Soto AND Bell into a comparison of what Toronto would have had to pay just for Soto.
 
Lets pickup Giles. He has to be an upgrade on what we have.

No he doesn't have to be. he's been really bad. That zero ERA is a mirage of the highest order. Dude's walking 20% of his batters faced between his minimal MLB and AAA innings logged this season. And he's not the flamethrower he used to be. He's down to averaging less than 95mph on his fastball this season. That says that either he hasn't rebounded from the arm injuries that scuttled the end of his Jays tenure or there's still something wrong and the time bomb is ticking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trellaine201
My point is there is no correlation of guys that can consistency throw heat and be effective at getting batters out. If that were the case everyone would acquire the fastest throwing pitcher.

There are many other factors that make pitchers effective and getting batters out which is what matters most;

-Secondary pitches
-movement
-arm angle
-arm slot
-deception
-release point
-repertoire
-late movement

And the list goes on. It’s why more good or great relievers have a mid-high 90s fastball because they can control it. And the have an elite secondary out pitch.

Here are the number of relievers who average more than 97 mph among the AL contenders;

Houston: 3
Yankees: 2
Minnesota: 2
Seattle: 1
Toronto: 1
Tampa: 0

If the Jays play Seattle or Tampa in the first round those teams have no edge there.

The Yankees have 1 extra player and one of those guys has a -0.1 fWAR this year in Abreu, is he even guaranteed to make the playoff roster? Chapman didn’t have enough innings to qualify but he averages 98 mph but he is walking 6 batters per 9 innings with a -0.2 fWAR, he may not make the playoff roster either. Every single player currently on the Jays roster has a better K to ratio than Chapman and that includes Kikuchi.

Yankees added 2 guys at the deadline; one that averages 96 in Trevino and another that averages 91 Effross.

Jays added Bass who averages 95 and Pop who averages 96.

Minnesota’s top 2 velo guys in Duran and Lopez have a combined fWAR of 2.1. The Jays top 2 velo guys have a combined fWAR of 2.0 in Bass and Romano.

Only “edge” I see is Houston. Houston’s top 3 velo guys have put up 2.8 fWAR this season in Stanek, Abreu and Montero to the Jays 2.6 fWAR in Bass, Romano and Garcia. Is there really an edge here?

I'm curious if there are stats out there (I'm sure there are) that show the correlation between average velocity and K rate. I've always assumed that they are significantly positively correlated.

There's a piece from like 13 years ago that does show a correlation between velocity and strikeouts.


velo1.jpg

(I have no idea if the chart will stay or if FG disables hotlinking)

Two things stand out though:

1) It's not as strong of a relationship as you might think or expect. There's definitely correlation but it's not huge. There aren't a lot of soft-tossers that strike guys out, but there are a bunch of big velo guys who don't.

2) This also presumably includes a ton of survivorship bias. The hard-throwing K-machines are the guys that have other tools good enough to stick it out in the bigs and be useful (the article mentions that there's a cutoff of 30 IP during the season for which the data was collected). What you don't see is the raft of fireballing scattershot guys with zero control or no secondary pitches or whatever.

If I had to draw a conclusion it's that velo influences your strikeout rate floor more than your ceiling. Soft-tossers are less likely to strike hitters out than fireballers, but fireballers are not automatically better at racking up Ks than their slower brethren.

One of the data points on that graph is a solid case study that we should be familiar with: Brandon League. Dude threw some serious gas (threw a sinker that averaged 96-97 for most of his career) but was awful at striking hitters out (usually averaging less than 15% k-rate or less than 7 k/9 for most his career)

4. Finally - and this bit was pure speculation from him, but he says Springer has a reputation around the league for being similar to a hockey player in his ability to tough it out and play through injury...so he thinks he might be hurt more seriously than the team has let on.

This is a problem. If he had gotten this addressed a couple weeks ago when it wasn't that big of a deal maybe we wouldn't be in this situation right now. Lauding guys who play through injury for their toughness is a double-edged sword because in most cases playing through an injury also means making it worse.
 
Curious if the Padres knew about it when they traded for Soto. These things usually take time I would think yes. On 1 hand your star is out for the postseason getting Soto helps, on the other hand, it's 1 of the 3 years you have Soto now where you're not at full strength.
 
So he loses an entire season of his prime on completely self inflicted stupidity between the wrist injury being his fault and now this.

I'm sure when all is said and done he'll be worth it but man, that contract ain't looking so hot too far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seath The Scaleless
There's a piece from like 13 years ago that does show a correlation between velocity and strikeouts.


velo1.jpg

(I have no idea if the chart will stay or if FG disables hotlinking)

Two things stand out though:

1) It's not as strong of a relationship as you might think or expect. There's definitely correlation but it's not huge. There aren't a lot of soft-tossers that strike guys out, but there are a bunch of big velo guys who don't.

2) This also presumably includes a ton of survivorship bias. The hard-throwing K-machines are the guys that have other tools good enough to stick it out in the bigs and be useful (the article mentions that there's a cutoff of 30 IP during the season for which the data was collected). What you don't see is the raft of fireballing scattershot guys with zero control or no secondary pitches or whatever.

If I had to draw a conclusion it's that velo influences your strikeout rate floor more than your ceiling. Soft-tossers are less likely to strike hitters out than fireballers, but fireballers are not automatically better at racking up Ks than their slower brethren.

One of the data points on that graph is a solid case study that we should be familiar with: Brandon League. Dude threw some serious gas (threw a sinker that averaged 96-97 for most of his career) but was awful at striking hitters out (usually averaging less than 15% k-rate or less than 7 k/9 for most his career)



This is a problem. If he had gotten this addressed a couple weeks ago when it wasn't that big of a deal maybe we wouldn't be in this situation right now. Lauding guys who play through injury for their toughness is a double-edged sword because in most cases playing through an injury also means making it worse.

That's really interesting and a bit surprising - R2 of 0.22 is considered to be weak correlation in stats. I would have assumed the coefficient of correlation/determination to be a lot higher in that regard. Serves Phil's point, I think.
 
Tiedemann had a rough start tonight

Meh. Would have been out of the 1st with no baserunners if not for the error(unearned run). Leadoff triple in the 2nd created the run on its own, the rest of that inning was fine. Led off the 3rd with 2 singles and got pulled. Reliever gives up a 3 run HR to make Ricky's line worse.

Obviously not good. But it was likely better than the line suggests.

In addition to the Toman note last night Kasevich and Doughty also off to torrid starts to their pro career. UDFA McCarty which the very interesting Division 3 slugger background got his first HR today and he's hitting over .400 as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: canucksfan
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad