Player Discussion The Slaf Thread - Parabolic Growth Edition

The Gr8 Dane

L'harceleur
Jan 19, 2018
13,835
27,540
Montréal
Logan Cooley at 1oa would have been a completely off the wall pick. Mckenzies list had 5 for slaf, 4 for wright and one for cooley.
FWWfBaGXoAAkOV_.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrei79

Ozmodiar

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
6,367
7,718
Anyway, I'm a big fan of Slaf and I believe that he will dominate in this league, but Slaf and Cooley are not even the best players from 2022 draft, it's....

Lane FREAKING Hutson !!!!!!!!
A re-draft of 2022 would be like re-ordering the 7 Dwarves from alphabetically to by height.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ReHabs

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
26,325
20,666
Quebec City, Canada
A re-draft of 2022 would be like re-ordering the 7 Dwarves from alphabetically to by height.
Re-draft before 5 years have passed are stupid anyway. It is my opinion that anyone doing a re-draft before d+5 doesn't know what he is doing.

Here's a 2018 redraft done in 2021


Joel Farabe 5th. Even Bouchard 10th. Dobson 12th. Redraft before d+5 are stupid.
 
Last edited:

Ozmodiar

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
6,367
7,718
Re-draft before 5 years have passed are stupid anyway. It is my opinion that anyone doing a re-draft before d+5 doesn't know what he is doing.

Here's a 2018 redraft done in 2021


Joel Farabe 5th. Even Bouchard 10th. Dobson 12th. Redraft before d+5 are stupid.
Re-drafts after d+5 are also stupid.
 

habbubba

Registered User
Jan 19, 2024
324
309
Got to feel a bit bad for the big goofball, who can't relate to that it takes a good third of the season to remember how to play the game that you've been playing since being a child.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1909

ReimanSum1908

Registered User
Feb 23, 2012
759
1,051
Montreal
We dodged the Kotkamiemi contract only to have the Kotkamiemi contract at home
Worse. Dollar for dollar, Kotkaniemi is a better player than Slafkovsky in terms of overall impact and hockey sense when contracts are taken into consideration.

Philly healthy scratched Michkov couple of games best thing ever happened to him. We could do same with Slaf or Dach
Indeed; if one team can do it to a far superior young player, the Canadiens can do it to Slafkovsky.
 

ReimanSum1908

Registered User
Feb 23, 2012
759
1,051
Montreal
What was you opinion of Subban's 9 millions contract?
He was worthy of the nine million before he signed his bridge deal because he had proven while on his entry level contract that he was a Norris calibre defenseman based on all the advanced metrics, the eye test, and more. We could have had him for 7.5 but for the bridge deal, and that would have been a steal before injuries accumulated and his play fell off.

No one since Subban has proven more on his entry level deal with the Habs, certainly not Slafkovsky.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ReHabs

70Stang

Registered User
Feb 21, 2008
265
216
This probably won't go over well but its time Slaf played 10 games in Laval. Play that lazy guy 24+ min a game. Give him so much ice time he pukes all over himself. That is the fix. Stop treating him like he is something special. He needs to be brought down a peg and honestly some humble pie will be good in the long run. Patches was in same situation as Slaf when we first came up. The problem is the current management doesn't have the ability to do the right thing. Kid need to learn to skate with his head up and not toe pic every 6 strides. That type of confidence can only happen in Laval. Most of the time you see him he is standing still or making one hand lazy plays.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Redux91

Kobe Armstrong

Registered User
Jul 26, 2011
15,838
6,844
Can you explain to me how a bridge contract makes sense?

We dont need the cap space now. We need it in years 3-8 of his contract. So we bridge him, save cap now when we don't need it, and if he is a superstar in 3 years we pay him 12-13 million per year?

Versus:

Paying extra now when we don't need it, and risking him becoming a mediocre top 6 player only worth 5-6 million in 2028?

To me, one of these options has a significantly higher cap risk than the other. Unless we think that Slaf is a junk asset not even worth hanging on to past RFA.
Here's the situation where a bridge deal works

He signs cheap for 2-3 years and improves steadily but not to superstar level. Then when he is 23-24 we get to sign him for 8mil x 8years, or whatever his value is, and we have him locked up until he is 31-32+. Currently, he will be a UFA at 29 and will be looking to cash in on another 7-8 year deal later that will take him to retirement.

Three ways the long term extension fails:
1. He never becomes worthy of the current AAV
2. He walks as a UFA at 29
3. He extorts us for a ridiculous high AAV 7-8 year contract extension at age 29 and isn't worth it for the last few years
 
  • Like
Reactions: sampollock

Frank Drebin

Please do your part to end concern trolling
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,663
23,421
Edmonton
Here's the situation where a bridge deal works

He signs cheap for 2-3 years and improves steadily but not to superstar level. Then when he is 23-24 we get to sign him for 8mil x 8years, or whatever his value is, and we have him locked up until he is 31-32+. Currently, he will be a UFA at 29 and will be looking to cash in on another 7-8 year deal later that will take him to retirement.

Three ways the long term extension fails:
1. He never becomes worthy of the current AAV
2. He walks as a UFA at 29
3. He extorts us for a ridiculous high AAV 7-8 year contract extension at age 29 and isn't worth it for the last few years
You think he's going to sign for a similar amount at 23-24 when the cap is 100+ million?
 

Kobe Armstrong

Registered User
Jul 26, 2011
15,838
6,844
You think he's going to sign for a similar amount at 23-24 when the cap is 100+ million?
The amount he signed for his about what his value is projected to be in 3-4 years, it all depends on how he does.

If progress is Up Only then of course long term makes sense, if you aren't certain how good he will be bridge makes sense
 

Frank Drebin

Please do your part to end concern trolling
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,663
23,421
Edmonton
The amount he signed for his about what his value is projected to be in 3-4 years, it all depends on how he does.

If progress is Up Only then of course long term makes sense, if you aren't certain how good he will be bridge makes sense
In 3-4 years if he’s a 50 point player he’s going to sign for 5.5-6 million ish, which saves us 1.5 - 2 per year for those last 5 years. IF we don’t pay for potential then again.

If he turns into a physical 80+point beast perhaps red hot in the first half of his contract year what is saying he doesn’t ask for the equivalent of what nylander got? That could be in the 12-13m range.

There is risk in this deal

Way, way more risk in a bridge deal

You can say you’re not sold on the player without suggesting a bridge deal which is frankly, dumb
 

Kobe Armstrong

Registered User
Jul 26, 2011
15,838
6,844
In 3-4 years if he’s a 50 point player he’s going to sign for 5.5-6 million ish, which saves us 1.5 - 2 per year for those last 5 years. IF we don’t pay for potential then again.

If he turns into a physical 80+point beast perhaps red hot in the first half of his contract year what is saying he doesn’t ask for the equivalent of what nylander got? That could be in the 12-13m range.

There is risk in this deal

Way, way more risk in a bridge deal

You can say you’re not sold on the player without suggesting a bridge deal which is frankly, dumb
You’re ignoring the UFA age
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad