The Oilers don't deserve Connor McDavid

Status
Not open for further replies.

Morlu

Registered User
Nov 4, 2011
2,779
1,088
I don't agree with tanking, but at the same time. Edmonton sells out every game, they deserve a new toy. I do feel that doing what Buffalo did is not in the best interest of the sport. I personally believe that intentionally tanking should result in the forfeiture of your 1st round pick, but that will never happen.
 

Fourier

Registered User
Dec 29, 2006
26,697
22,280
Waterloo Ontario
No team deserves McDavid. But the premise of this piece completely ignores the fan's perspective. Pretty hard to criticise the Oiler faithful given their patience through the mess that this team has been over the last 8 years.

Aside from that the claim that the Oilers will ruin McDavid because they played Daisaitl for 37 games is ridiculous.

In short, this piece has essentially no merit and all it will accomplish is to encourage flaming between fan bases.
 
Last edited:

Aceonfire*

Guest
That was quite literally one of the worst and most ridiculous things I have ever read.

Was Taylor Hall ruined by selecting him first overall?

No team "deserves" high picks. Bad teams get them because they suck. Look at Tampa.

And Draisaitl is still in his post-draft year. How can you possibly say they ruined him when he is tearing up the WHL?

What a garbage piece of writing.
 

TheNuge

Registered User
Jan 3, 2013
803
25
I don't agree with tanking, but at the same time. Edmonton sells out every game, they deserve a new toy. I do feel that doing what Buffalo did is not in the best interest of the sport. I personally believe that intentionally tanking should result in the forfeiture of your 1st round pick, but that will never happen.

While I agree that what buffalo has done is bad for the sport I don't agree with the forfeiting... I prefer to see them pick at number 10 instead lol.
 

Church of Toews*

Guest
I don't agree with tanking, but at the same time. Edmonton sells out every game, they deserve a new toy. I do feel that doing what Buffalo did is not in the best interest of the sport. I personally believe that intentionally tanking should result in the forfeiture of your 1st round pick, but that will never happen.

They've had more toys in the past 5 years than Buffalo has throughout their entire history........ don't even get me started on how they've had Gretzky Messier Kurri Fuhr and friends all on the same team edmonton doesn't deserve a first round pick. Sucking and not improving your team for 10 years just to get a horde of top round picks isn't in the best interest of the sport


See i can make it apply to your team too. Buffalo has done more to improve their team this last off season than edmonton has in the last 5
 

Aela*

Guest
There are no Fans in the league that deserve McDavid more than Oilers Fans.

Wrong. All Oilers had to deal with was their ****** on ice product. There are many teams where they had to deal with that and various other things as well.

Regardless it's unprofessional to write this article. Extremely so.
 

Nei1ey*

Guest
No offense but I'm not clicking that link and giving you more hits. All your previous articles have been completely bush league. And the headline for this one doesn't sound promising at all. Who the hell are you to decide if Edmonton deserves it or not, their fans who stuck it out with the awful product on the ice year after year, sure as hell deserve McDavid.
 

613Leafer

Registered User
May 26, 2008
13,021
3,960
I don't agree with tanking, but at the same time. Edmonton sells out every game, they deserve a new toy. I do feel that doing what Buffalo did is not in the best interest of the sport. I personally believe that intentionally tanking should result in the forfeiture of your 1st round pick, but that will never happen.

How exactly has Buffalo intentionally tanked more than Edmonton?

Buffalo added veterans Moulson, Gorges, Mezaros, Gionta, Stewart, etc.
Held onto mid-20s players like Hodgson, Myers, Ennis, Stafford, Foligno, etc.
Promoted youth from within via Girgensens, Zadarov, Ristolainen, etc.
And rolled the dice on unproven 1B goalies Enroth/Neuvirth

Edmonton's veteran additions over the past 5 seasons aren't any better, especially when you look back in the 2010/2011/2012/2013 years. They haven't held onto any more mid-20s players than Buffalo, haven't made any bigger moves to address goaltending, etc. The only thing they've done differently is have three 1st OA picks walk directly onto the roster into significant roles, whereas Buffalo's top picks haven't been as NHL ready.

So if Buffalo had had the 1st OA picks in 2012/2013/2014, and they were on the roster instead of Grigorenko/Ristolainen/Reinhart being in their system, then they wouldn't be tankers? Granted for that to have happened, Buffalo would have had to ice a much worse team the previous three years, or in essence "tanked".

Edmonton tanked just as much as Buffalo. Both teams put out secondary/tertiary veterans, secondary/tertiary mid-20s players, didn't make any overly aggressive trades, and promoted from within.

In fact, Buffalo trading three 2nd round picks for Gorges/Fashing/Deslauriers are pretty comparable to the most aggressive moves Edmonton has made over the past 4-5 years combined. Trading MP + 2nd for Perron is the only time Edmonton has traded a 2nd rounder in the past 5 years.
 

Church of Toews*

Guest
You had 3 first overall picks in a row and even more top 10 picks in the past 10 years what makes you think you deserve McDavid when you haven't even attempted to improve your team. If Buffalo could acquire Georges and Moulson Edmonton could of too they're not even trying to improve the team
 

Sabresfansince1980

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 29, 2011
11,215
5,762
from Wheatfield, NY
I don't agree with tanking, but at the same time. Edmonton sells out every game, they deserve a new toy. I do feel that doing what Buffalo did is not in the best interest of the sport. I personally believe that intentionally tanking should result in the forfeiture of your 1st round pick, but that will never happen.

While I agree that what buffalo has done is bad for the sport I don't agree with the forfeiting... I prefer to see them pick at number 10 instead lol.

Oh this again... Buffalo didn't gut their roster just to land McDavid. They traded away vets that didn't win for Buffalo, AFTER the team went south for a few seasons. They traded away players that not only didn't win, but ones that DID NOT want to re-sign. What else is a GM to do than trade them away while they still had value? What else is a GM to do than to start over?

Despite the inevitable rebuild option, they still went out and traded for or signed decent vets...moves that didn't cut into their prospect pool. This continued misconception about Buffalo's management has to be the most brain dead thing going on these boards.
 

ThirdManIn

Registered User
Aug 9, 2009
55,115
4,034
I don't agree with tanking, but at the same time. Edmonton sells out every game, they deserve a new toy. I do feel that doing what Buffalo did is not in the best interest of the sport. I personally believe that intentionally tanking should result in the forfeiture of your 1st round pick, but that will never happen.

How do you prove a team is intentionally "tanking" instead of making roster moves to put themselves in a better position to rebuild for the future? When we figure that out then we can start doling out punishment, but it's a rather difficult thing to prove.
 

Frank the Tank

The Godfather
Aug 15, 2005
16,347
14,237
Chicago, IL
You had 3 first overall picks in a row and even more top 10 picks in the past 10 years what makes you think you deserve McDavid when you haven't even attempted to improve your team. If Buffalo could acquire Georges and Moulson Edmonton could of too they're not even trying to improve the team

Ummm... you realize the Oilers signed the UFAs Pouliot and Fayne this off-season that goes along with signing UFAs Gordon and Ference in the previous off-season. That pretty matches what Buffalo did in acquiring Moulson and Georges.
 

SNES

Registered User
Aug 7, 2012
892
669
Manotick
There are no Fans in the league that deserve McDavid more than Oilers Fans.

I literally puked in my mouth. Seriously? How about fans stop selling out games and show management how they feel instead of martyring themselves. Disgusting.
 

The Nuge

Some say…
Jan 26, 2011
28,014
9,298
British Columbia
You had 3 first overall picks in a row and even more top 10 picks in the past 10 years what makes you think you deserve McDavid when you haven't even attempted to improve your team. If Buffalo could acquire Georges and Moulson Edmonton could of too they're not even trying to improve the team

You mean like how we got Pouliot, Fayne, and Nikitin? Research is your friend.
 

Nei1ey*

Guest
Man I hope the Oilers win the lottery. Mostly because I want people like OP to get even more angry.

Yes sir, I am rooting big time for that. Makes no sense when people say they don't deserve it. If they don't deserve it, then i don't know who does.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad