Question:
What evidence is there that he is any good at running a department that will incorporate data into their process as a team?
Dubas needs thm to win him a few rounds. It would be a disaster losing him and bringing in the dinosaur that would hard correct the team into gritty cavemen
you have some good ways to look at but I think you need to Bob Ross this a bit and complete the full picture.
you are focused on goaltending in elimination games.
a series is a culmination of all games.
as measured by save percentage, we had the 2nd best performance in net over the 2021 playoffs.
The failure of the team in the playoffs is a pretty good indication he is incorporating data into his processes. If he weren't they would be making moves to make the team a playoff winner instead of just getting good prices for borderline top 9 players with sweet underlying statistics who will disappear once the games mean something. The proof is in the coach's goofy refusal to change any lines or tactics as the series against Montreal slipped away. The numbers say the Leafs are the best, our job is done.Maybe this new thread can bring about an answer to this question
Let’s grant that statistics have a place in the game. They can factor into personnel decisions, tactics and the like.
but it’s more than just numbers.
it’s doing something with them.
As Dubas once said, “Basically, there is a big difference between raw statistics and data gathering and using that data to incorporate into your process as a team”
Question:
What evidence is there that he is any good at running a department that will incorporate data into their process as a team?
Maybe there's other options between cavemen and top heavy skill based?
The acquisitions of guys like Foligno, Simmonds, Bogosian, Ritchie, Gabriel, etc. over the past couple of seasons would suggest that Dubas is trying to find a balance of non skill elements to high end skill that works in all situations.
How do you have a balance when you play Marner 27 mins?
his core needs grit. Not a bottom 3 role guy.
That’s really hard to do when you have spent all the money on 4 guys.The acquisitions of guys like Foligno, Simmonds, Bogosian, Ritchie, Gabriel, etc. over the past couple of seasons would suggest that Dubas is trying to find a balance of non skill elements to high end skill that works in all situations.
Im not going to comment on the rest of the post but I wonder if the Matthews/Maner line being the best defensively might also have to do with how Montreal tried to play them. Basically get the Danault line to match against them with their sole purpose to stop M&M from scoring. If neither line scored that is a big win for Montreal.We were also one of the best defensive teams in the first round led by arguably the best defensive line in the first round, the Matthews/Marner line. It sure makes things easier to stop the puck when way more shots/chances are going the other way. Measured over the entire playoffs, we had the best defensive team out of all 16 (although I'd like to stick to the first round)
There are always multiple teams that fall in the first round for the reasons the Leafs did. The 1st place pens only lost to the Islanders because of the massive difference in net. Team save% in that series was 92.33% to 88.83% while the Pens had the better of the play and were also one of the best defensive teams in the first round. Thats how important goaltending is. Jarry was a disaster. You switch the goalies and the Isles dont make it out of the first IMO.The Oilers were a hyper version of goaltending difference and depth issues but that was more on their keeper being worse than Campbell though.......it didnt mean McDavid and Drai wernt two of the best players in the first round and Crosby had great underlying numbers too.....but it still remains he only has 5 points the past two playoffs due to facing Price and Varly playing lights out back to back while his keeping was subpar. On the surface it looks like Crosby played like crap though. He didnt.
It's true, gotta look at the complete picture.
Agreed, the issue is there isn't the cap to get those type of players (who can still play the game well) in the top 6 and have the skill to compliment the big 4. Hopefully Ritchie can be that guy?The acquisitions of guys like Foligno, Simmonds, Bogosian, Ritchie, Gabriel, etc. over the past couple of seasons would suggest that Dubas is trying to find a balance of non skill elements to high end skill that works in all situations.
That's a deeper philosophical question and a franchise changing move that seems to be reserved for the next regime, if applicable.
We were also one of the best defensive teams in the first round led by arguably the best defensive line in the first round, the Matthews/Marner line. It sure makes things easier to stop the puck when way more shots/chances are going the other way. Measured over the entire playoffs, we had the best defensive team out of all 16 (although I'd like to stick to the first round)
There are always multiple teams that fall in the first round for the reasons the Leafs did. The 1st place pens only lost to the Islanders because of the massive difference in net. Team save% in that series was 92.33% to 88.83% while the Pens had the better of the play and were also one of the best defensive teams in the first round. Thats how important goaltending is. Jarry was a disaster. You switch the goalies and the Isles dont make it out of the first IMO.The Oilers were a hyper version of goaltending difference and depth issues but that was more on their keeper being worse than Campbell though.......it didnt mean McDavid and Drai wernt two of the best players in the first round and Crosby had great underlying numbers too.....but it still remains he only has 5 points the past two playoffs due to facing Price and Varly playing lights out back to back while his keeping was subpar. On the surface it looks like Crosby played like crap though. He didnt.
It's true, gotta look at the complete picture.
That’s kinda what I have been thinking. All we hear is the team that sent us golfing had this great goalie that shut down our dominating team……..when does our great goalie get here?If goaltending is a factor... didn’t Dubas trade for Campbell?
can’t the stats help our goalies out?
if Goaltending is the difference maker... that can overcome skill upfront... trade a core piece for a really good one.
I assume he can identify a really good one right?
That's a deeper philosophical question and a franchise changing move that seems to be reserved for the next regime, if applicable.
That’s kinda what I have been thinking. All we hear is the team that sent us golfing had this great goalie that shut down our dominating team……..when does our great goalie get here?
Muzzin, Clifford, Foligno, Simmonds, Bogosian, Ritchie, Gabriel, Sabourin, and offered Hakaanpa the CAR deal.The acquisitions of guys like Foligno, Simmonds, Bogosian, Ritchie, Gabriel, etc. over the past couple of seasons would suggest that Dubas is trying to find a balance of non skill elements to high end skill that works in all situations.
Muzzin, Clifford, Foligno, Simmonds, Bogosian, Ritchie, Gabriel, Sabourin, and offered Hakaanpa the CAR deal.
Lou acquired Martin, Boyle, and….?
Dubas needs to find a way to add a top 6 player like the above (no, Ritchie is not that), but to say he’s allergic to this style of player is hilarious.
Reserved for the next regime because the current one is incapable of a course correction?
Fletcher was here for a couple years before he dealt Clark for Sundin.
is Kyle not capable of such a decision?