PanniniClaus
Registered User
- Oct 12, 2006
- 10,419
- 4,500
nothing positive to say at this point.
That would defeat the purpose of the thread
nothing positive to say at this point.
It's St. Patrick's Day in a party city so I'm sure some of them made a trip down from Minnesota for a couple days, and with the city growing as fast as it is there are fans of every team who live here now. I work across from a hotel downtown and I already saw 5 or 6 of them walking out of the lobby yesterday at like 11am.Since when do the Wild have traveling fans? How are we such a magnet for bandwagonners?
The absolute worst thing to happen to us would be dropping down to the 8AFPOS, getting swept in the playoffs, and that 1st rounder that we gave to TO for Franson/Santo ends up being the lottery-winner.
I could see Franson being re-signed as a prelude to moving one of Jones/Ellis, but would be shocked to see both moved. I don't think it really makes long-term sense either. Franson isn't a great fit for Lavy's system, certainly not like Ellis or Jones are. If you keep Franson to free up one of them for trade bait, fine, but to trade both away in favor of keeping an offense-only d-man that's a poor fit for the system being used?Back to the negativity. Thru 71 games
2.56 GF60 2.16 GA60
last year 2.40 GF60 and 2.62 GA60
Now I think we expected more from Lavi's system n the GF and the additions. Since Jan 1 GF has dropped from 2.60 to 2.56 so the recent events has not been the reason for the continued struggle. If goal by defensemen were factored out I would get ugly. The dramatic decrease in GA is a no brainer even though Pekka has struggled recently.
The glaring question is where does Poile go from here. He was tasked to make the playoffs well they are limping in. As someone pointed out perhaps Franson is going to be resigned freeing up moving Jones. That still laves Ellis playing on the 3rd pair a would be more valuable to be moved. We have Neal and FF9 locked up for the top 6. you have to think Fish and Ribs will both be back. Smith and Wilson are the wildcards are they players Lavi can push to 25 or more goals??? I have to think one of them will be moved. Especially if Jones is moved for that young potential 1C Poile packages Ellis and either Smith or Wilson or a upgrade on he Wing to play 2nd line.
This is not blowing the team up it is repositioning into a balanced team.
FF9-Ribs-Neal
Wilson or Smith Fish New wing from (Ellis Smith-Wilson trade)
Fiala- Young 1C from Jones trade-Arvidsson
Goose and take your pic
Weber-Josi
Eck-Franson
Sign 2 F/A that play defense first not have visions of being top pair
Keep AV
No all of this is mute if there is no plan to keep Franson. Its also too many young players for my liking next year as well. But at some point there needs to be a more balanced team. And there will be someone who will outcry what about Hook at this point I would move the guy for a pick.
I could see Franson being re-signed as a prelude to moving one of Jones/Ellis, but would be shocked to see both moved. I don't think it really makes long-term sense either. Franson isn't a great fit for Lavy's system, certainly not like Ellis or Jones are. If you keep Franson to free up one of them for trade bait, fine, but to trade both away in favor of keeping an offense-only d-man that's a poor fit for the system being used?
I understand your point but we do have Josi and Weber 50 and high 40 point defensemen. Franson will be a 40 guy as well so theres not a shortage of firepower. The issue is upgrading the forwards and that nagging need for the 1C. If Ellis is traded this offseason it does not change the fact that Jones is not going to sit behind Weber forever yes he will be here until hes a UFA and then we get Sutered again. With Weber and Josi theres little doubt that defensemen we bring thru the system will develop. And if Franson is there guy theres no need for a replacement for a few years whereas the opportunity is there now to retool and get the offense that Lavi needs and still have more D than he has ever had. That or take another direction in system or coach.
The question will be is moving Ellis plus prospects a safer move than a package involving Jones as the main piece. Jones being so young puts everyone in a pickle because while he doesn't look that great a lot of the time right now at age 20, thinking he'll be anything less than solid top 4 material when he's like....22 or 23 is probably being very naive. In other words, there's almost no doubt in my mind he'll be better than Ellis now when Jones is that age. The problem is that the Jones of this exact moment isn't terribly appealing to a lot of people and we're willing to mortgage the defensive future for a fix now. Is that the answer? Hell if I know.As great as Weber/Josi are, I think you suck that much talent out of the back-end and we're just not as potent a team, regardless of who you bring in up front. Franson scares the hell out of me in a top 4 role, and Eckholm really hasn't looked all that great since Ellis first got hurt. I think if you have to move one of Jones/Ellis, then so be it, but the other will still have a rather significant role to play in the organization going forward.
I also still we're over-hyping the concern on Jones wanting to bolt. He has yet to prove himself a consistent and steady top 4, there's time yet before he's prepared to shoulder a top pairing role. From a value standpoint, though, I do prefer to move him over Ellis.
We're not really mortgaging the future by trading Jones. Ellis was already a solid #3 before the injury and is still not in his prime. Ekholm was looking pretty good next to him, especially right before the injury. He's also still not in his prime. We have no reason to think Weber doesn't have a lot of good years left considering his very short injury history (played every game this year, played all 48 in the lockout year, and has played at least 78 games in all the other seasons besides his rookie year and 07-08). And decent third pairing guys show up every year during FA or can be traded for for a pretty cheap price.
I don't think it will make much of a difference when they are both on the second pair. Ellis has a 45 point upside IMO (if he hadn't gotten injured he'd be on pace for 35 with what's been a dreadful power play this season), which is typically how much the best #3's put up in a season. His defensive game is almost there already. The composure, positioning, and possession game are there already.
Except he gets run the frig over in the Defensive Zone.