Injury Report: The Injury Thread || Stolarz out 4-6 weeks || McCabe on IR

[Smif]

What is Stolarz's timeline?

 

[Commander Clueless]

What is Stolarz's timeline?

I think he's in all of the timelines except the Darkest Timeline.

 

[nuck]

What is Stolarz's timeline?

A week ago they were saying he is a month away. First week in Feb then hopefully.

 

[Suntouchable13]

Woll is my guy for game 1 of the playoffs anyway. I do think Stolarz is a stud when he plays, but this knee issue will probably not go away.

 

[budzz]

A week ago they were saying he is a month away. First week in Feb then hopefully.

I would guess unless he's ahead of schedule, he will be back after the 4 nations thing which runs February 12th to 20th. Would make sense to give him the extra time to rehab, maybe even a Marlies start or 2 during that.

 

[Commander Clueless]

Woll is my guy for game 1 of the playoffs anyway. I do think Stolarz is a stud when he plays, but this knee issue will probably not go away.

Woll first half of the first round (back), Stolarz until halfway through the second round (knee), then Matt Murray for the cup baybee!

 

[CabanaBoy5]

Woll is my guy for game 1 of the playoffs anyway. I do think Stolarz is a stud when he plays, but this knee issue will probably not go away.

I don't think the knee will be an issue once he's ready to come back. A pebble/bone fragment was taken out and we assume that was the issue. If anything, he might be better if it was diagnosed and taken care of properly.

 

[NMacrules]

Whats going on with Hakanpaa?

 

[Divine]

This team just can’t stay healthy.

We get 1 player back and lose another. Jake McCabe probably out a month now. Looked very similar to Tavares in the playoffs.

 

[Leafs87]

This team just can’t stay healthy.

We get 1 player back and lose another. Jake McCabe probably out a month now. Looked very similar to Tavares in the playoffs.

I saw the replay and knowing Hathaways rep I have a hard time seeing that knee at the end as incidental. Kypreos alluded to the same thing saying Hathaway has a reputation. Very unfortunate but these are the things you can’t just let slide especially with a back to back. The team needs to set a precedent that this kind of shit won’t be accepted. Honestly whether he’s good or not (Reaves) this team decided they will have a heavyweight in. Until you get someone better than Reaves, play him and let him take these fights. If he’s unwilling, waive him and bring someone else in. This team and honestly every team needs someone around to take care of this nonsense. Playing Dewar over him makes no sense, because while both provide very little offensively, Dewar provides no intimidation or forecheck either.

 

[The Apologist]

I saw the replay and knowing Hathaways rep I have a hard time seeing that knee at the end as incidental. Kypreos alluded to the same thing saying Hathaway has a reputation. Very unfortunate but these are the things you can’t just let slide especially with a back to back. The team needs to set a precedent that this kind of shit won’t be accepted. Honestly whether he’s good or not (Reaves) this team decided they will have a heavyweight in. Until you get someone better than Reaves, play him and let him take these fights. If he’s unwilling, waive him and bring someone else in. This team and honestly every team needs someone around to take care of this nonsense. Playing Dewar over him makes no sense, because while both provide very little offensively, Dewar provides no intimidation or forecheck either.

100% Reaves needs to play Tuesday and needs to find Hathaway. The message needs to be sent that this team is no longer taking this crap.

We can't count on the NHL to protect us.

 

[nuck]

100% Reaves needs to play Tuesday and needs to find Hathaway. The message needs to be sent that this team is no longer taking this crap.

We can't count on the NHL to protect us.

No he needs to find Travis Sanheim or Nick Seeler. Then Hathaway can find him later.

 

[ACC1224]

 

[Forsbergaura21]

Is there any word on how long McCabe will be out for?