The upfront work is done for that. The backend which I do not have the time, energy, smarts, knowhow, legal expertise with copyright law, etc.... would need to be done.
I would love to see it all available online that prevented mass downloads. If someone is willing to take on all the backend stuff I am all ears.
I would like to see this material become available for research. Is that your prime objective as well? I don't get the impression that you have any other motivations, such as money, glory, etc. It sounds like you also want to stay out of legal trouble. Fair enough, We all do.
My question for you (and for anyone else who is reading) is, after all this time, is there anyone living who'd care whatsoever that these old magazines were scanned and being used by historians for research? And could they ever mount a serious case against you if you only made them available at no charge?
Certainly if you charged people for access, you'd attract some attention from someone, eventually. But for free? It's not even a blip on anyone's radar.
Next question: You mentioned preventing mass downloads. Can you explain why this is a concern? Are you looking for a way that readers can only access it on their screens, similar to how magazines offer digital subscriptions? Is there a reason that you would object to readers of this material being able to download it for home use?
Magazines employ specialized reader apps because they are protecting their content from being pirated, cutting into the profits that they are making on current issues. But to protect
this content... why go to the trouble? You would not be protecting any profits by doing so.
Is there perhaps a concern that someone else could take your hard work and make money from it? I would not count on it. Personally, I am probably in the top-5 most interested people in this content. And I would not even pay for it. This is not to say it's not worth it. I'd pay a copyright holder money for access to it, just like I pay for THN or others pay for access to newspaper archives. (But who/what/where is the copyright holder? Do they even exist?)
It should just be put on a server, free to download. Google Drive or Dropbox. Interested parties will download it and share it for free with other interested parties. The more it disseminates, the less likely it becomes that anyone could ever take it and profit from it. Within 24 hours of you announcing it's available, the likelihood of some profiteer convincing anyone to pay him anything for it drops to practically zero.
And in the unlikely event that it becomes known to someone who actually holds copyright to any of this, that it's being shared for free online, and thinks they're being damaged by this content being "out there", and cares enough to try to do something about it, well, we have no idea who put it on that server back in 2023. Someone did. Wasn't us. We just downloaded it. No money changed hands. And if they manage to get it taken offline, all the people who wanted it already grabbed it, and can share it privately going forward.
You don't need to tell us how old you are, but you've said you remember the Blues' first season, so you're likely a senior citizen. It bothers me to think that someone could do such excellent work liberating the history of 20th century hockey journalism, preserving it for the potential use of future (and current) generations, and it could just end up sitting on a hard drive on a shelf for the rest of that person's life. And then what? Discarded? Shelved for decades more by survivors who have no idea of, or interest in what's on it?
You have the chance to be the Robin Hood of vintage hockey research material. If I was in your position I would be jumping at the opportunity to have such a legacy. Damn the consequences! There won't be any.