DamonDRW
Registered User
OH, yeah. And they still have time and cap to trade for Crosby by then, I guess.Vegas this weekend lol
OH, yeah. And they still have time and cap to trade for Crosby by then, I guess.Vegas this weekend lol
Would absolutely love crouse. Feel the same about debrusk. We could really use that type of player to round out the top 6.A few names I wouldn’t mind tje Wings acquiring
Lawson Crouse from Arizona, nice power forward who willl get you 20+ goals with toughness
Jacob Middleton Dman from Minnesota. Keeps the flies off
I remember someone was screaming we had an easiest remaining schedule. Since then it was Panthers then Avs. Who's left? Boston, New York and Vancouver?
The problem is that this chart classify us as "tough opponents" for the rest of the teams and we know how good we areView attachment 831114
I don't know about screaming, but according to Tankathon, 2 weeks ago Wings and Bolts had the easiest ride for the rest of the season, today it is NYI and Wings. (Last week, the wings were closer to the middle)
Wings are tied in points with Philly and Bolts with a game in hand, they are in charge of their destiny, 6 of the Wings final 20 games left are "Tougher" opponents, they need to get back on track and take care of business against the teams they should beat.
Gut and reality check time, if the Wings make it to the dance, they will have outperformed the stated goal of simply playing meaningful games in March.
I think if the Wings finish higher than one of Bolts, NYI or Philly (I expect Philly to fade) they will make it in, as others such as Devils, Caps and Pens have brutal gauntlets to garner the point required to make a sustained move.
The Wings have some major holes to fill and are exploited when on the road by the upper echelon teams, but they are making forward progress.
Depending how they finish the season, I'd consider reshuffling everything. At some point Yzerman's going to have to realize he does actually need a player better than Larkin on offense if you want to seriously contend for a cup.
Well I'd just double back to your original...I think Yzerman looks to continually make the team better, I just don't think the returns for dealing any of those guys gets a significant piece back. At least not significant enough to make it worth dealing them.
If Yzerman really liked a lot of these guys, I think we'd be seeing more 5-7 year deals. The 2-4 year deals says to me that he values roster flexibility and that he's not bought in on a lot of these guys. So, I think he'd actually actually agree with you. The team needs to be better. But the moves have to be there to be made.
To add, "Toughest opponents" or "Easiest opponents" means nothing in the NHL. For, like, 85% of teams I would say.The problem is that this chart classify us as "tough opponents" for the rest of the teams and we know how good we are
No, but I'm not sure they're going to make the playoffs anymore either if an addition isn't made.Are we gonna get a title contender with lousy 3rd and 4th rd picks?
While I recognize its possible, it's been decades since the DRW have drafted a true difference maker, good enough to drive being a title contender, with such picks..
I think playoff experience at this point is more meaningful.
Extra mid rd picks are fodder at this point
I think he's been great this year, but he's a left handed D, and is best on the left side. Ed should be partnered with a RH D.Enough with the Chiarot slander, he's been really good this year
No, but I'm not sure they're going to make the playoffs anymore either if an addition isn't made.
They need a cost controlled top 4 d-manOh I agree
If SY makes zero additions he is at best coasting and at worse mailing it in..
We do not need a depth veteran 7th dmen typical TDL acquisition but acquiring a longer term asset, must be on his agenda
They need a good cost controlled dman and or forward who will be here for the next 2 to 5 years..They need a cost controlled top 4 d-man
Agreed. I think d-man is much bigger need thoughThey need a good cost controlled dman and or forward who will be here for the next 2 to 5 years..
It is based on straight up math, the wings still have a decent point percentage (hence in a playoff spot) so I would expect them to show up as a tougher opponent, if they are not, then it is because those teams are facing even higher in the standings teams.The problem is that this chart classify us as "tough opponents" for the rest of the teams and we know how good we are
I mean, don't they need to improve their defense? They technical added an NHL defenseman to their roster. Is he very good, not at all, but they technically addressed an area of need.Washington continues to sell. That's good for us.
Toronto refuses to ever address their actual issues.
I mean, don't they need to improve their defense? They technical added an NHL defenseman to their roster. Is he very good, not at all, but they technically addressed an area of need.
I think Holl is available. They loved him last time...I mean, don't they need to improve their defense? They technical added an NHL defenseman to their roster. Is he very good, not at all, but they technically addressed an area of need.
I completely agree.It just seems like that would be similar to us adding a depth defenseman. They have lots of depth guys already on the back end who play the same way IMO.
I've always liked Hertl, don't love his contract though. He's 30 and has 6 years left at $8.137M. Plus, he has a NMC and guys tend to like staying in SJ.So, a lot of people here think that if Yzerman does make a splash/big trade, it'll be for someone totally out of left field.
May I interest you in Tomas Hertl? I mean that's out of left field right? lol
In order for me to do this I would need SJ to retain a bitI've always liked Hertl, don't love his contract though. He's 30 and has 6 years left at $8.137M. Plus, he has a NMC and guys tend to like staying in SJ.