zenthusiast
cybersabre his prophet
- Oct 20, 2009
- 19,425
- 7,018
Certainly not for a LHD who's more a puck-mover than a defender.....we've got those coming out our ears.Fowler was a intersting deal, but don't see GMKA giving up that 2nd there either.
Who is our 2C after that or another acquisition?Marner may not be a franchise player but he brings something that this particular has lacked for a while. If they’d somehow agree to flip him for DC I’d carry the kid to Toronto on my back
I could understand why Toronto would do it but I don't think Cozens is enough. Marner has been rumored on the outs since last post season disappearance. I believe truth to those rumors and perhaps Toronto feels Cozens makes them tougher to play against.I don't understand why Toronto would do this. Of course I would do it because Marner is an elite first line winger, a great playmaker and a good two-way forward with good defensive game.
There is nothing in common at all between the handling of Girgs and the handling of Cozens.Sadly I see the same trajectory because of the organization's decisions to fast track guys. We will be left with a 4th line winger with a regressed skillset, when he should've been an effective "middle 6 guy" with a pretty complete skillset if we were even a little bit patient.
Because there’s more to hockey than points, and as I have mentioned earlier, he’s having a poor shooting% season, shooting 7% off by quite a bit in his career average.He's on a 45 point pace in his 3rd season after scoring 57 in his rookie campaign. Last year he had 37 points. He's not building off his rookie season. He's down in goals by a lot as the assists are doing the heavy lifting. How can we say Cozens needs a change of scenery and not apply the same thing to Beniers who's pretty much in a similar boat.
Find 2C in another deal, now our 2C is definitely not Cozens. If a guy like Marner is available and he somehow agrees to sign an extension in Buffalo, you try your best to get that guy.Who is our 2C after that or another acquisition?
They verbally kick someone out every year. I would be in favor of getting Marner anyway.I could understand why Toronto would do it but I don't think Cozens is enough. Marner has been rumored on the outs since last post season disappearance. I believe truth to those rumors and perhaps Toronto feels Cozens makes them tougher to play against.
I think if you looked you would find Marner has been rumored to be in trades since last off season. It wouldn't be the first time the fans and media ran a player out of Toronto.
Would you do it? Given that Marner waives and signs an extention?
I disagree, he can play his own line, sometimes it's better than 2C (depending on the center). Right now our 2C is Kulikh. I think Peterka or Benson will have a much easier time playing with a guy like Marner, also you can move Tuch to the second line or make a separate line with Marner. Just find a 2C in another deal, we have assets.Marner is one of the most creative forwards in the league, and a demon defensively and on the PK. But it would require something like Cozens + 1st + top prospect. I'm a big fan of Mitch, but he isn't the 200' 2C we need. Pass again.
Troy Terry anyone?
Who is our 2C after that or another acquisition?
I welcome any discussion that is fresh and new after just seeing boards bringing up the same talking points over and over again. I’d peg the chances of Marner ever coming here pretty darn low and as close to zero as you can get, but I’d think it’s something interesting to talk about.Unless I’m mistaken, the Sabres have not suggested they are looking to trade Cozens. Friedman merely reported that there are teams around the league asking about Cozens. The Steve Dangle clip was just saying it would be crazy for the Sabres to trade another underachieving forward, given how the last few have gone on to better things. The Marner for Cozens thing, was just Chad sarcastically retorting that if they like Cozens so much then maybe they should give us Marner for him. Chad’s reference to hoping Cozens scores 7 goals in the next two games v. The Leafs, as a response to the Dangle clip, makes no sense as they were defending Cozens, not criticizing him. We have descended into Madness.
Because you in the past said that UPL was shit and wanted him gone. You also said that Mitts sucked and we should get rid of him.Would you prefer I say it won’t matter if he’s good here? Because you’ve ignored that entire part. UPL is good. Where are they with him? Mitts got good before getting shipped out. Team was shit.
Until a team is built…nothing will matter. And this GM is incapable of building a team. Also…Dylan Cozens sucks f***ing ass and has every year aside from one outlier shooting percentage that people need to let go of. How do I know he won’t be good? Because he never has been. He just had stuff go in one year. Unlike every other year of his career. And now, as a bonus, he’s a gigantic p***y who isn’t a center, looks slow, and is too stupid to figure things out.
Keep him. You aren’t going anywhere anyway. But at least you can see if he gets better on your 9th place at best team forever.
Is Kevyn Adams going to build a playoff team by the time Cozens can’t coast off his one outlier season? If you think no…what the f*** is the point of keeping him?
People want big change…but an overpaid, overrated third line winger played far above his capabilities actively costing them games…that’s a non-starter. Let’s get real.
I’d rather free up money they will spend and get back professional hockey players who aren’t so far in their own brainless head that they’re wasting their career. Because there are a dozen younger guys I’d much rather surround with that then have them turn out like Dylan Cozens.