The 2024-2025 Roster Thread

dickiedunnwrotethis

It's gotta be true.
May 16, 2009
640
363
saskatoon
And if that means giving up one central prospect? I can easily do that because I'm done holding on to all the prospects. We have Kulich, Helenius, Ostlund. Of course, I wouldn't mind trading Rosen first, but I'm tired of waiting for all these prospects and losing again.
Any of our center prospects should be available for a 2C (assuming it's not a rental).
 

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
59,159
40,355
Rochester, NY
Something around Cozens for Weegar please.
I doubt that Craiger wants to move Andersson or Weegar for a struggling young center on a big ticket contract.

:dunno:

Any of our center prospects should be available for a 2C (assuming it's not a rental).
The challenge is that they are unlikely to have much trade value right now. Ostlund has only played 6 games for the Amerks this season and hasn't done anything. And Helenius is not looking like the NHL-ready guy that his coach last year hyped him up as.
 

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
157,245
112,236
Tarnation
I doubt that Craiger wants to move Andersson or Weegar for a struggling young center on a big ticket contract.

:dunno:


The challenge is that they are unlikely to have much trade value right now. Ostlund has only played 6 games for the Amerks this season and hasn't done anything. And Helenius is not looking like the NHL-ready guy that his coach last year hyped him up as.

Ostlund has been hurt - seems like either concussion or shoulder based on the seven weeks since he last played. Helenius has done well but isn't NHL ready. But he may very well be very close.
 

dickiedunnwrotethis

It's gotta be true.
May 16, 2009
640
363
saskatoon
I doubt that Craiger wants to move Andersson or Weegar for a struggling young center on a big ticket contract.

:dunno:


The challenge is that they are unlikely to have much trade value right now. Ostlund has only played 6 games for the Amerks this season and hasn't done anything. And Helenius is not looking like the NHL-ready guy that his coach last year hyped him up as.
My assumption would they would be a piece of a larger trade package.
 

Fjordy

It's a disaster
Jun 20, 2018
18,242
10,093
To get a good, proven 2C/top 6C we'll probably need to trade Cozens+ or one of Byram/Power as the basis of a deal. Either trade for a rental (Granlund, Nelson) or look for a guy who might need a change of scenery and can break out elsewhere. Like Zito did with Bennett.
 

Tijuana Donkey Show

Registered User
Mar 14, 2023
314
361
Maybe Ruff is the wrong coach for this group. Maybe someone with a style like Tortorella would have been better.

When you assemble a team whose main qualification is "Do they want to be here" and not winning this is the on ice product you get.

The team is soft. They can’t handle old man Lindy being the least bit critical of them without turtling. If Torts were here he’d 1. Be fired almost immediately. And even if he wasn’t these kids would be crying in their cars in the parking lot, refusing to come in for game day.

My point is, they don’t need harder coaching, they need more hardened peers. Too many softies. And too many prior soft coaches to stroke their egos when Lindy isn’t listening.

Right now we’re watching kids who just went to college, then mom and dad held their hand through grad school and are now out in the real world all on their own.
 

TheMistyStranger

ミスト
May 21, 2005
31,664
7,509
The team is soft. They can’t handle old man Lindy being the least bit critical of them without turtling. If Torts were here he’d 1. Be fired almost immediately. And even if he wasn’t these kids would be crying in their cars in the parking lot, refusing to come in for game day.

My point is, they don’t need harder coaching, they need more hardened peers. Too many softies. And too many prior soft coaches to stroke their egos when Lindy isn’t listening.

Right now we’re watching kids who just went to college, then mom and dad held their hand through grad school and are now out in the real world all on their own.

I'm not saying you're wrong, per se, but there are so many assumptions here...wild.
 

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
157,245
112,236
Tarnation
I don't think they are getting a prime-aged 2C in season unless someone somewhere has a breakdown with their team and demands to be traded.

But a replacement veteran type 2C? I could see them trying that out if they weren't so absolutely fetishizing picks and prospects by making a pick for vet deal earlier than the deadline. That's basically Gourde from Seattle or Granlund from San Jose - both have warts, not sure Gourde is actually 2C productive, but if they want to push Cozens to wing, they would have to look at some sort of rent-to-own.
 

dickiedunnwrotethis

It's gotta be true.
May 16, 2009
640
363
saskatoon
It's not a problem for me to trade such a prospect for a top 4 RD, we need this no less than 2C, if not more.
I don't believe trading from an area of weakness is ever a good idea (hence why I was so vehemently against the Mitts/Byram trade). Using a combination of roster players, picks, and/or non-center prospects should be sufficient to score a decent partner for Power/Byram.
 

Fjordy

It's a disaster
Jun 20, 2018
18,242
10,093
I don't think they are getting a prime-aged 2C in season unless someone somewhere has a breakdown with their team and demands to be traded.

But a replacement veteran type 2C? I could see them trying that out if they weren't so absolutely fetishizing picks and prospects by making a pick for vet deal earlier than the deadline. That's basically Gourde from Seattle or Granlund from San Jose - both have warts, not sure Gourde is actually 2C productive, but if they want to push Cozens to wing, they would have to look at some sort of rent-to-own.
Or look at guys like Frost, Kotkaniemi, Pinto and Novak and hope they could fill that hole.

I don't believe trading from an area of weakness is ever a good idea (hence why I was so vehemently against the Mitts/Byram trade). Using a combination of roster players, picks, and/or non-center prospects should be sufficient to score a decent partner for Power/Byram.
Sometimes you have to give to get. But we're talking specifically about Weegar here. Of course Adams could have been a top 4 RD long ago if he wanted to, but he didn't want to do that in the summer. It's going to be a lot harder now.
 

Fjordy

It's a disaster
Jun 20, 2018
18,242
10,093
Frost is probably the option, but the Flyers being run by a cabal of former players means deals will likely have to require a seance where Snyder's ghost approves the deal.

Norris seems like the available guy over Pinto.
Norris is a good player, but we all know his situation with his shoulder and contract. We'll have to maybe include someone like Sammy in the deal to reduce the risk.
 

dickiedunnwrotethis

It's gotta be true.
May 16, 2009
640
363
saskatoon
I don't think they are getting a prime-aged 2C in season unless someone somewhere has a breakdown with their team and demands to be traded.

But a replacement veteran type 2C? I could see them trying that out if they weren't so absolutely fetishizing picks and prospects by making a pick for vet deal earlier than the deadline. That's basically Gourde from Seattle or Granlund from San Jose - both have warts, not sure Gourde is actually 2C productive, but if they want to push Cozens to wing, they would have to look at some sort of rent-to-own.
A nearing "best before date" vet 2C is probably the most likely scenario and who knows, might even be the best play given the givens. That said, I still would like them to take a big swing (even if I know it's a pipe dream).
 

Sabreality

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 12, 2008
10,939
4,703
Atlanta, GA
Helenius is practically untouchable in my eyes. We talk about low IQ players currently being an issue, I think he's has that ROR/Reinhart level IQ out there when he arrives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Der Jaeger

Fjordy

It's a disaster
Jun 20, 2018
18,242
10,093
I wouldn't touch Norris with Chara's stick.

He is a goals > assists guy and another young guy from a losing organization who's never been on a playoff team.

Hard pass for me.
Then who would you trade for?

Helenius is practically untouchable in my eyes. We talk about low IQ players currently being an issue, I think he's has that ROR/Reinhart level IQ out there when he arrives.
Probably any prospect should be on the table for a right deal, although I also really like Helenius and would not want to trade him.
 

dickiedunnwrotethis

It's gotta be true.
May 16, 2009
640
363
saskatoon
Frost is probably the option, but the Flyers being run by a cabal of former players means deals will likely have to require a seance where Snyder's ghost approves the deal.

Norris seems like the available guy over Pinto.
Agreed on Frost.

Norris' shoulder scares the shit out of me.

At this point, I would be willing to support a serious overpay to get the right guy. Enough dicking around already.
 

Ace

Registered User
Oct 29, 2015
25,512
32,067
I love Helenius. He was the player I wanted even if they didn’t trade down.

I will drive him to the f***ing airport myself if he was traded for something proven that we desperately need.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad