- Jul 16, 2005
- 14,857
- 13,013
It seems some people would rather win the draft lottery than the Stanley Cup.
Who are those people?
It seems some people would rather win the draft lottery than the Stanley Cup.
Have you ever seen the Mike Zaun videos on YouTube? He does a great Francesa impression
During the presser they both said the accident had no effect on the trades. I sorta think that’s the truth and you’re right about Georgiev otoh maybe they were Luke warm on trading buch and said f*** it after the accident ?I think if they were going to sell Georgiev it would have been done well before TDL.
Barring a drop in performance, theres no reason why he wouldn't fetch just as much at the draft.I think if they were going to sell Georgiev it would have been done well before TDL.
If the team were actually shit then I wouldn’t judge. Last year, sure. I was right there with people rooting for the tank.Rooting for a top pick is not rooting for failure. I'm rooting for a dynasty. I could just as easily say it's you who is rooting for failure.
Great Post. If the team was bad that is one thing but they aren’t.If the team were actually shit then I wouldn’t judge. Last year, sure. I was right there with people rooting for the tank.
But this is the youngest team in the league, who has taken their game to another level down the stretch...rooting against them in this situation is missing the forest for the trees. The team has improved. For anyone who doesn’t realize, that’s a GOOD thing. And rooting for losses so we can maybe get the 8th pick is just sad in my eyes, but if that’s the way you wanna live, go for it. Just know that no NHL front office will ever agree with you, and adjust your expectations accordingly.
Honestly I think they want to keep him and Igor. I have a feeling this is the end of the road for HankBarring a drop in performance, theres no reason why he wouldn't fetch just as much at the draft.
And unfortunately time prevented him from trading for a 35 year old under contract for 6 more years.Lou got ripped off twice in a couple hours.
![]()
What do you guys think about the Isles getting Pageau. He's a good player and I think he fits in well over there but they gave up a lot and the contract wasn't cheap. I still think they don't have a chance to truly contend.
If the team were actually shit then I wouldn’t judge. Last year, sure. I was right there with people rooting for the tank.
But this is the youngest team in the league, who has taken their game to another level down the stretch...rooting against them in this situation is missing the forest for the trees. The team has improved. For anyone who doesn’t realize, that’s a GOOD thing. And rooting for losses so we can maybe get the 8th pick is just sad in my eyes, but if that’s the way you wanna live, go for it. Just know that no NHL front office will ever agree with you, and adjust your expectations accordingly.
We have two first rounders this year to stack up at forward in a deep draft. I dont think resigning Kreider has all of a sudden made us unable to keep building with youth. I admit I didn’t expect this quick of a jump but I’m not unhappy about it at all. LGR!!!Well then you should probably understand where I'm coming from when I say, yeah, I'd like to lose to get one more top pick. It's not "rooting to fail."
I mean, I think the opposite is missing the forest for the trees. I actually realize and acknowledge this team is on the upswing, fast. I think there's no way this team isn't a strong playoff contender barring some unforeseen move this offseason. The playoffs and winning down the stretch and getting experience gelling together, all that is coming, and it's coming soon, and it's irreversible. No one is advocating a 5 year tankathon of bottoming out (or at least, I'm not) (and I think that's where much of the resistance to my position is coming from).
I think we aren't good enough to win anything of subtance this year, I think we are on an unstoppable course to playoff relevance, though, so I think all those arguments about the team needing to stop losing so they don't become the Oilers or Sabres, all that is gonna be fulfilled next year (or worst case the year after).
I just think we had (have?) one more chance to capitalize on our assets to acquire some more Kravtsov and Chytil - level talents, and I am not thrilled that we chose Kreider over that opportunity.
As I've said, I think we need more talents of that level and I think there are still paths out there to accomplish it, it's just harder now.
One of those paths, now that we are locked in on Kreider and we don't have the extra ammo, is .... we can lose.
Seems like the most obvious way. So I'm for it.
Of course it's a good thing that the team looks like it's on the upswing. I can't wait till I can go back to actually wanting and hoping for them to win every game next year. I watch with my 3 year old son and it's gonna be great to have that together for this next team iteration.
But I just think we need one more offseason of talent acquisition at forward. And the high draft is the best place to get it. Nothing "rooting for failure" about that.
I agree...it was a good move for them as like you said, he is a very nice fit as he can kill penalties and he has some offensive skills which they desperately needed.
Do I think it's a move that will make them Cup contenders? Absolutely not from what I've seen of all the teams but I do think it pretty much insures they will be in the playoffs.
As far as them winning a round in the playoffs it depends upon who they'd play obviously tho if I had a gun to my head, I'd bet the Isles would be one and done!.
I can't wait for the year maybe as soon as next, when we can face them in the playoffs because trust me as I've been around when the Rangers and Islanders played each other every year in the playoffs from 1979 to 1984, there is nothing and I do mean NOTHING like a Ranger Islander playoff series when both teams are good and have aspirations of winning a Cup.
I'd bet 50% maybe even more of the peeps here on our board haven't ever experienced what a Ranger Islander series feels like seeing they are too young or weren't even born yet. Trust me when I say this, it's a friggen treat as for any playoff series you might have experienced in the past decade, it's going to be 10 x's more intense than that!!
Possibly. it depends where we end up. It is a deep draft so I would love to get two really good talents in the first round but if they move up to draft a bigtime player in for itSomething tells me the Rangers will package those firsts to move up come draft day
.
I rest my caseThat is not actually a matter of fact at all.
I'm sure you have a perspective of what you think works best, I'm also quite sure it is not mandatory for winning. It is especially not mandatory when you are a couple years out from serious contention. The experience can also be acquired organically, it doesn't have to be imported or preserved from the last regimes.
I think we’ll use one or both to make a roster move to improve.Something tells me the Rangers will package those firsts to move up come draft day.
you might get what you want anyway with Igor going down. If they lose some of the next few games they’ll drop right out of contention and we’ll still have signed KreiderWell then you should probably understand where I'm coming from when I say, yeah, I'd like to lose to get one more top pick. It's not "rooting to fail."
I mean, I think the opposite is missing the forest for the trees. I actually realize and acknowledge this team is on the upswing, fast. I think there's no way this team isn't a strong playoff contender barring some unforeseen move this offseason. The playoffs and winning down the stretch and getting experience gelling together, all that is coming, and it's coming soon, and it's irreversible. No one is advocating a 5 year tankathon of bottoming out (or at least, I'm not) (and I think that's where much of the resistance to my position is coming from).
I think we aren't good enough to win anything of subtance this year, I think we are on an unstoppable course to playoff relevance, though, so I think all those arguments about the team needing to stop losing so they don't become the Oilers or Sabres, all that is gonna be fulfilled next year (or worst case the year after).
I just think we had (have?) one more chance to capitalize on our assets to acquire some more Kravtsov and Chytil - level talents, and I am not thrilled that we chose Kreider over that opportunity.
As I've said, I think we need more talents of that level and I think there are still paths out there to accomplish it, it's just harder now.
One of those paths, now that we are locked in on Kreider and we don't have the extra ammo, is .... we can lose.
Seems like the most obvious way. So I'm for it.
Of course it's a good thing that the team looks like it's on the upswing. I can't wait till I can go back to actually wanting and hoping for them to win every game next year. I watch with my 3 year old son and it's gonna be great to have that together for this next team iteration.
But I just think we need one more offseason of talent acquisition at forward. And the high draft is the best place to get it. Nothing "rooting for failure" about that.
I would imagine the discussions went like this:Did they discuss Johnny Hockey with Flames? If so, I hope they revisit this in the off season