jfc64
Registered User
- Jul 2, 2006
- 4,484
- 408
A new 2006 in the making?
Karlsson will get picked over players he shouldn't be. Same with Adam Larsson. Eriksson Ek is heavily underrated amongst Swedish posters, which I find weird. He's a very good defensive center. If Klefbom is healthy and good to go, he'd be the 7D.
Ah yes, noted young gun 27yo Sundqvist.I dont see the need for players such as Silfverberg and Backlund now that we have younger hungry and more physical players in Eriksson Ek, A.Kempe and Sundqvist.
Ah yes, noted young gun 27yo Sundqvist.And Kempe shouldn't be used in a defensive role. Which is why he's far down my list. There's a lot of players I like better for a top-9 role.
If you want young names there's Bratt, Lindblom, Stenlund, & Höglander. Then for the middle-of-the-pack age-wise (like Sundqvist) there's Järnkrok, Wennberg, Arvidsson, & Burakovsky.
Yikes.Backlund should be there, he's one of those who never declined, is well respected and was a captain already. He is super consistent and is a decent all-around player. I can't see how he does not fit the team. I'd get him in the squad before William Karlsson
And I would love to see Ziba playing with Rakell again, those guys were magical together
Backlund should be there, he's one of those who never declined, is well respected and was a captain already. He is super consistent and is a decent all-around player. I can't see how he does not fit the team. I'd get him in the squad before William Karlsson
And I would love to see Ziba playing with Rakell again, those guys were magical together
U cant give someone a spot just becuse he is a good guy who never declined. We have better options than Backlund in Eriksson Ek and Sundqvist for the 4C. And i dont know how u can think Backlund is better than William Karlsson. William does everything Backlund does but with more speed and skill.
Yes the Rakell - Zibanejad - Janmark line was epic. I could actually see Janmark getting a spot, but nothing more than 4th line.
Tie goes to the veteran, you know that.No love for kids: Eklund, Raymond, Holtz ...?
With all due respect, I sincerely disagree that Eriksson Ek (he may be there some day though) and Sundqvist are better options. Hell, might as well invite Sorensen if we're even considering Sundqvist. Backlund is a much better player and a proven leader. He can play the role and be a threat at the same time. Grit is overrated anyway, especially in the Olympics. Everybody bitched and moaned when De La Rose, Kruger or MPS were invited so why do we want to repeat the same mistake.
I'd personally want Bratt in there, not because he is better overall than any of the others, but I feel like he plays with a lot of speed and finess, adds another dimension.
too bad Hedman took so long and Karlsson dropped off so quickly. Id love to see a team with those two at their best.
Maybe Erik can get his shit together one more time.
I think i just nailed it.
Landeskog - Bäckström - W.Nylander
Forsberg - Elias - Lindholm
Rakell - Zibanejad - Bratt
Arvidsson - Karlsson - Hörnqvist
Hedman - Brodin
Lindholm - Klingberg
OEL - Ekholm
Markström
Lehner
Ullmark
Looks good to me
I think i just nailed it.
Landeskog - Bäckström - W.Nylander
Forsberg - Elias - Lindholm
Rakell - Zibanejad - Bratt
Arvidsson - Karlsson - Hörnqvist
Kempe - Eriksson Ek
Hedman - Brodin
Lindholm - Klingberg
OEL - Ekholm
Dahlin - Karlsson [as soon as there is a softie, bench for period]
Markström
Lehner
Ullmark
Exactly! It is a bit strange that so many users here still use that model and just picks 12 forwards and 6 defensemen.And in the olympics 25 players are allowed: