Team Board Mock Draft

Who will the Devils pick?

  • Sacha Boisvert, C, North Dakota (NCAA)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Igor Chernyshov, LW, Dynamo Moscow (KHL)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Trevor Connelly, LW, Providence (NCAA)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Alfons Freij, D, Vaxjo (SWE)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Michael Hage, C, Michigan (NCAA)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    85
  • Poll closed .

Hasbro

Family Friend
Sponsor
Apr 1, 2004
53,305
17,566
South Rectangle
A series of 1 day polls for the forthcoming draft. Picks will be decided by vote.*


*not polling for #1 since we know who it will be and Sharks fans get to vote on their other 1st

Please Only Vote if you are a Devils fan.

Links to the individual threads on the player names.


Mother Thread on Prospect Board

1. :sharks Macklin Celebrini, c, Boston University (NCAA)


2. :hawks
Ivan Demidov, RW/C, SKA (KHL)


3. :ducksArtyom Levshunov, D, Michigan State (NCAA)


4. :cbjCayden Lindstrom, C, Medicine Hat (WHL)


5. :habs Tij Iginla, F, Kelowna (WHL)
6.

1715536931391.png


Zeev Buium, D, Denver (NCAA)

7. :sens
Anton Silayev, D, Torpedo Nizhny Novogorod (KHL)



8. :seattle Sam Dickinson, D, London (OHL)



9.:flames
Berkly Catton, F, Spokane (WHL)


10. :devils???????
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dialamo

Guadana

Registered User
Mar 7, 2012
8,599
23,006
St Petersburg
Its perfect.

I hope we will draft Nygard. Nothing special. But I would be happy with some other players. Helenius and Chernyshov are great to pick. Sennecke is acceptable.

I hope we will not draft Eiserman. It would be mistake where we will not add nothing to to the team and he will not make anything better and if he will be top 6 player, he will add scoring(if he will, I hope he will, I wish him only best) but some other problems will be more problematic.

I want better for our centers, I want better for our team. And hope Fitz will draft Better Player Available, not WPA with better shot.
 

spfan

Registered User
May 4, 2009
1,854
522
They don't need more RHD. They could have Helenius as a 3C or just move him to wing, but I'd go high upside, definite winger for Hughes or Hischier. Eiserman is flawed, but his upside is high. I feel like he's getting too much hate lately. Some might say he's too alike Holtz, but I think that's kinda silly.
 

Brodeur

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
26,744
17,498
San Diego
I picked Eiserman but didn't feel great about it.

In this scenario, I wonder if a trade down would be an option. Somebody like Minnesota trading up a couple spots for Helenius if he's the last center of that tier available. Or San Jose moving up to secure one of Parekh/Yakemchuk if they think there's a gap.
 

Guadana

Registered User
Mar 7, 2012
8,599
23,006
St Petersburg
Oh, StevenToddIves' and Guadana's propaganda has done its job. :naughty:

I picked Yakemchuk. We need our own mini chaos giraffe to the Devils.
Agree. We are too structured.

Jokes aside Yakemchuk's pick would be dumb but very fun. I know @Guttersniped would hate it. I'm not a fan too. But if he will learn positional game he will make a damage. Jack will hate this guy.

@Zubrus Coffee Maker is trying to outplay Columbus.
 

Monsieur Verdoux

Registered User
Dec 6, 2016
2,102
3,350
Finland
Agree. We are too structured.

Jokes aside Yakemchuk's pick would be dumb but very fun. I know @Guttersniped would hate it. I'm not a fan too. But if he will learn positional game he will make a damage. Jack will hate this guy.

@Zubrus Coffee Maker is trying to outplay Columbus.
I think our defense needs size and toughness, and if - and that's a big if - Yakemchuk learns positional game, he would be a really good pick for the Devils. I really like his offensive skills, so the problem with him is his defense.

He probably is ready to play in the NHL in two or three years, and we don't know what's the situation on the right side. I mean, in 2027 Hamilton starts his last season with the Devils if they don't trade him before that, and we don't know yet what we have in Casey. However, I think they'd pick Helenius, MBN or even Sennecke, if the draft goes this way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guadana

Guadana

Registered User
Mar 7, 2012
8,599
23,006
St Petersburg
I think our defense needs size and toughness, and if - and that's a big if - Yakemchuk learns positional game, he would be a really good pick for the Devils. I really like his offensive skills, so the problem with him is his defense.

He probably is ready to play in the NHL in two or three years, and we don't know what's the situation on the right side. I mean, in 2027 Hamilton starts his last season with the Devils if they don't trade him before that, and we don't know yet what we have in Casey. However, I think they'd pick Helenius, MBN or even Sennecke, if the draft goes this way.
Like @evnted said, mostly players are continuing to play way the did. The neutral way of processing the game doesn't change more often. Mostly players are going better and better in what they are really good and trying to develop their issues to the minimum acceptable level. Only few players develop their weak side dramatically.
So even if I would want to see some changes in game of some prospects, I don't know who will make this huge step. With Yakemchuk its a huge risk. Of course if he will make it he is perfect top pair defenseman, if he did not - he should be quite good second pair offensive defenseman and pp specialist, but we far away from that need.

I agree that RD should not be forgotten in the drafts. Defensemen are taking longer to develop, Dougie is already played 3 years, we don't know how many years he has in the tank.
 

Monsieur Verdoux

Registered User
Dec 6, 2016
2,102
3,350
Finland
Like @evnted said, mostly players are continuing to play way the did. The neutral way of processing the game doesn't change more often. Mostly players are going better and better in what they are really good and trying to develop their issues to the minimum acceptable level. Only few players develop their weak side dramatically.
So even if I would want to see some changes in game of some prospects, I don't know who will make this huge step. With Yakemchuk its a huge risk. Of course if he will make it he is perfect top pair defenseman, if he did not - he should be quite good second pair offensive defenseman and pp specialist, but we far away from that need.

I agree that RD should not be forgotten in the drafts. Defensemen are taking longer to develop, Dougie is already played 3 years, we don't know how many years he has in the tank.
Yeah, maybe it's mostly wishful thinking on my part that one day Yakemchuk is a defensively sound two way dman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StevenToddIves

Hockey Sports Fan

Registered Loser
Sponsor
Jun 30, 2010
10,999
4,682
Connecticut
i think i’m finally all aboard the Brandsegg-Nygard train. I dunno if his ceiling is as high as Helenius or some of the other players available here, but i think the Devils are in a unique position where they dont need another star player as much as they need someone who’ll come in and outwork everyone else on the ice and make life miserable for the other team.
 

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
Same. Nygard has reached mythical status among the fanbase. I don’t think people realize how good Helenius is.
How many folks here watch the prospects themselves? A handful at most. I am honest that I just rely on those folks to tell me what they see. One of the prospect watchers called Helenius “Hischier Lite”. Some will see that as damning him with faint praise.
 

Poppy Whoa Sonnet

J'Accuse!
Jan 24, 2007
7,619
8,295
Helenius, the center prospect pool is nonexistent. Best player available too but even if you think Nygaard is better he’s not way ahead of Helenius, and Helenius is a positional need (in the pool).
 

Doublechin

Registered User
Jun 23, 2013
3,251
1,453
Helenius, the center prospect pool is nonexistent. Best player available too but even if you think Nygaard is better he’s not way ahead of Helenius, and Helenius is a positional need (in the pool).
Sennecke is BPA by far at 10 here and the only player that has legit star potential
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

Doublechin

Registered User
Jun 23, 2013
3,251
1,453
It seems there are valid differences of opinion at 10. What pushes him to the top in your view?
It all starts from going from 5'10 to 6'2 in a year and still being able to perform and skate as good. That level of growth usually comes with some struggles but as the year went on Sennecke only got better.

His hands are elite combine that with size and overall game and you quickly have a very appealing asset, if he's there at 10 he's BPA. I think by year's end you might see him closer to 5 than 10 on Mackenzie's final list. 7-8 is where I think he slots in this year
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forge and My3Sons

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
It all starts from going from 5'10 to 6'2 in a year and still being able to perform and skate as good. That level of growth usually comes with some struggles but as the year went on Sennecke only got better.

His hands are elite combine that with size and overall game and you quickly have a very appealing asset, if he's there at 10 he's BPA. I think by year's end you might see him closer to 5 than 10 on Mackenzie's final list. 7-8 is where I think he slots in this year
That’s fair. How do you see his skating?
 

evnted

Registered User
Apr 14, 2016
821
2,076
thank god more of the helenius voters turned out, he and eiserman were uncomfortably close the last time i looked at this lol

konsta for me here. mbn fit is amazing and im def not disappointed in taking him in this scenario but i think helenius is prob a half tier up on him, certainly in terms of puck play and vision and if theres one point i disagree w the mbn crowd on its on-puck smarts. hes fine, i dont mean to imply its a weakness, i just think theres enough brute forced plays and occasional lapses with backchecker awareness that im reluctant to call it high end. rounding out the argument would be the half a year age difference and positional benefit of taking a center

still, quite happy if these are the two players our staff is debating in this scenario (no offense to the other kids lol). clearly the best mix of upside/value and roster/timeline benefit
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,086
28,034
Brooklyn, NY
Oh, StevenToddIves' and Guadana's propaganda has done its job. :naughty:

I picked Yakemchuk. We need our own mini chaos giraffe to the Devils.
Very close for me, but I went Nygard over Helenius. Chernyshov also was a guy I considered.

All three are high-IQ, high-compete, two-way players who skate very well, but I went with the best skater and defensive forward in Nygard, a guy who excelled at both RW and C in Allvenskan and could win a Selke Trophy in the NHL one day.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad