Prospect Info: Team Board Mock Draft

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.

:confused:

  • Matthew Boldy, LW, USNTP (BC Commit)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Cole Caufield, RW, USNTP (Wisco Commit)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Spencer Knight, G, USNTP (BC Commit)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Raphael Lavoie, C, Halifax (QMJHL)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Alex Newhook, C, Victoria (BCHL, BC Commit)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Victor Soderstrom, D, Brynas IF (SHL)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ryan Suzuki, C, Barrie (OHL)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Cam York, D, USNTP (BC Commit)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    99
  • Poll closed .
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.

Hasbro

Family Friend
Sponsor
Apr 1, 2004
53,692
18,088
South Rectangle
Fan vote draft that will go through each team's board.

Who should the Kings pick at #5?




1. :devils Jack Hughes, C, USNTP 88.6%



2. :rangers Kappo Kakko, RW, TPS 94.0%


3. :hawksBowen Byram, D, Vancouver (WHL) 63.2%


4. :avs Dylan Cozens, C, Lethbridge (WHL) 32.6%


5. :kings Alex Turcotte, C, USNTP (Wisconsin Commit)


Link to the results thread
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PeterEggum32
Went with Kirby Dach because I think that's who they would pick, my choice in this situation would probably be Turcotte.

I think exactly the same. Want Turcotte but believe they will draft Dach as the Kopitar protégé in waiting and eventual replacement.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: LAKings88
All the guys I wanted are gone so had to go Dach I guess. But whoever drafts after us will get the better player that's how bad this season has been. :(
 
In this scenario I think the Kings probably take Turcotte, a two way center with hip injuries just screams LA King. I'd take Podkolzin, but I don't believe the Kings have the balls to do that
 
Last edited:
Went Podkolzin on the assumption someone has spoken to the lad and fully understands his situation.

When is the combine?" That will make move things around, possibly significantly, so until then I’m not set on anything. Well, apart from hoping Byram is available.
 
In this scenario I think the Kings probably take Turcotte, a two way center with hip injuries just screams LA King. I'd take Podkolzin, but I don't believe the Kings have the balls to do that


Do you really believe that, post-Vilardi, we'll be taking another "injured prospect" with our 1st round pick? WHY???????????????
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dexter Sinister
Do you really believe that, post-Vilardi, we'll be taking another "injured prospect" with our 1st round pick? WHY???????????????

Hughes has missed games do to injury and illness, including WJC tournament games.

Kakko had a concussion this year and has to have a strict diet due to diabetes.

While Turcotte has some injury red flags, expecting the Kings to pass up on talent due to injury severely waters down available players.
 
I can only hope COL takes Cozens over Dach, Podkolzin, and Turcotte. I'd love Byram yet we get our choice from the top 3 forwards outside the top two.

BPA easily Podkolzin
Highest potential player with a good floor Dach
Future captain and RoR like impact Turcotte

The order I'd take them if all 3 available too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dexter Sinister
Podkolzin won't be there when LA picks so if he is they should take him.

ESPN (far from bible on hockey sources) just did a mock and had Chicago taking Podkolzin and LA taking the D man. Would love it if LA was able to get Cozens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dexter Sinister
Do you really believe that, post-Vilardi, we'll be taking another "injured prospect" with our 1st round pick? WHY???????????????
Unless he’s still injured or has a degenerative hip condition... of course you draft this kid!, he came back from his hip injury and scored at over a PPG but more impressive he was nearly at a Goal pg !!
Explosive skater
Versatile
Outstanding defensively
Playmaker
Etc...

Yes... the Kings should absolutely draft Alex Turcotte!
 
I chose Pod. The pick scares me a little, but he is the BPA in this position... Our scouts said that whoever goes after the first two picks will take a year or two to develop. It might as well be in a men's league. He is just too skilled to ignore. I would rather go out swinging for the fences than playing it too safe or going off the board. This team could possibly have as many as four Russians on it soon with Prokhorkin, Kovalchuk, and even a crazy possibility of re-adding Voynov. There maybe stability here for him.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: YP44 and lumbergh
I went with Pod but almost took Dach.

If this is how the draft actually went then I would be 100% happy with either.

I can't consider Turcotte due to the history of Hip Injuries.

Too much at stake to take that risk IMO.
 
The fact that Turcotte is ranked so highly even after player so few games this year is significant. His injuries seem to be completely healed and not chronic but I am sure that this will be verified with medical reports before the draft. Any team looking at him will want those concerns addressed. That said, he probably has the most star potential between the 3 non-Russian Forwards(Cozens & Dach) that are being mentioned in the top 5. If he is there and Byram is gone, he is the guy.

Dach is the safest pick because he won't be any worse than a really good #2 Center and could be a #1 if he continues to develop and get stronger. You can do a lot worse than that in a draft. Cozens is also a guy that could be potentially a star #1 player and versatile in that he can play Wing or Center.

Here is an article on all of them. Funny that it doesn't mention Byram: Blackhawks Must Seize Opportunity, Four Names To Watch At No. 3
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.

Ad

Ad

Please disable your adblocker on HFBoards.com

It looks like your adblocker is attempting to interfere with the intended operation of this site. Support us by allowing our site to function as we intended. Please disable your adblocker and add us to your allowlist.

Frequently Asked Questions
I'm not using a blocker. Why am I seeing this message?
You're likely seeing this message because an app or extension on your computer is blocking ads. The app or extension may be a "privacy" or "malware" blocker, or a VPN.

I disabled my blocker. Why am I still seeing this message?
It's common to have two or more adblocking extensions running at the same time. See the question above.