Value of: Tanner Jeannot
- Thread starter logik47
- Start date
Why would they trade this guy? Painful overpayment. That's the value. Otherwise he's going to stay on a team that is absolutely happy with him.
VanillaCoke
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2013
- 25,941
- 12,592
A1LeafNation
Good, is simply not good enough!
- Oct 17, 2010
- 27,649
- 17,717
Porter Stoutheart
Seen Stamkos?
- Jun 14, 2017
- 15,824
- 12,163
Gaylord Q Tinkledink
Registered User
- Apr 29, 2018
- 31,616
- 34,656
Porter Stoutheart
Seen Stamkos?
- Jun 14, 2017
- 15,824
- 12,163
Forsberg, Duchene, Granlund, Johansen are set in stone. The other two would just kinda depend. To me, Tolvanen and Tomasino would be the right choices to play with Johansen.
But really, I don't think the Nashville forward group has a stereotypical "top 6" anymore. Jeannot's line is just as good as the so-called "2nd line", and having him there helps make that so. I wouldn't be in any rush to put him on a different line that some folks might label the "2nd line". It's an option, but so far it has worked out better for us keeping that hard-hitting line with Jeannot, Trenin, and Sissons together. You get on a bit of a losing streak and everybody is going to have some ideas how to shake things up, so I'm sure the ideas are about to start churning again. I don't think we're losing out by having Jeannot stay right where he is.
A1LeafNation
Good, is simply not good enough!
- Oct 17, 2010
- 27,649
- 17,717
Porter Stoutheart
Seen Stamkos?
- Jun 14, 2017
- 15,824
- 12,163
He's gonna make $800k again next year and still be an RFA, and probably sign a long-term deal for around $4-5M per after that, and everybody in Nashville will be happy with that. There's no motivation to trade him there.
Porter Stoutheart
Seen Stamkos?
- Jun 14, 2017
- 15,824
- 12,163
No Kunin. But if you did slide Jeannot up in the lineup, he's certainly a candidate to take Jeannot's spot on the hitting line.
Why would the Preds trade him? Only way he gets traded is for a massive overpayment which I doubt any teams would do.
PavelBure10
The Russian Rocket
I would work on a deal involving Boeser and Jeannot. I don't know much about Jeannot, but every game I see of him, he's played great. An Energetic, combatant, with good hands. Jeannot is a gamer. It's highly unlikely that Nashville would trade him, but if he were to be available, Then I really hope the Canucks are picking up the phone and calling right now, he is exactly the type of player the Canucks need.
Not trading jeannot at all. He’s exactly the type of player hynes wants on his team. I just wish he got more power play time. He would have more than 14 goal if he did.
Bringer of Jollity
Registered User
Viqsi
"that chick from Ohio"
This is one of those situations where it's easier on everyone involved just to say "he's not available, go away".
Nashville doesn’t trade him unless you offer ridiculous overpayment. He checks all the boxes of what we need
big and physical
Good shot
Gives 100% every game
A physical fitness beast
Young
Still room to grow
you want him you have to offer something that can’t be said no to
big and physical
Good shot
Gives 100% every game
A physical fitness beast
Young
Still room to grow
you want him you have to offer something that can’t be said no to
Yup, pretty much the player we wanted to see Hartnell grow into before we were forced to deal him and the player we always wanted Colin Wilson to be when we drafted him in the top 10. We've waited a long time for a good power forward type to come along.
Porter Stoutheart
Seen Stamkos?
- Jun 14, 2017
- 15,824
- 12,163
Save yourself the effort. Boeser is not even a starting point in a trade for Jeannot. Jeannot is already scoring just as much with far less opportunity. And then does everything else he does on top of that. There are entire teams out there that simply don't have a player we'd trade Jeannot for. Vancouver is probably one of those. There just isn't a fit to any need we have, even with your best players. This is why I say it would make most peoples' heads explode. Better to just walk away.
