This is what I said in the locked Roster Building thread:
"Guys who suck at playing hockey but make the NHL generally have to really figure out how the game works to get there. As bad as he was on the ice, I wouldn’t exactly use that as evidence against giving Glass a role within the organization"
If he's going to be one of these traveling 'development coaches,' I don't think they're suppose to be skills coaches, and everyone he's every played with or has been employed by really like him, so he seems like as good as a candidate as anyone to get prospects familiar with the organization and help them on their way
Yeah I get it. Jonesy is one of the best analysts in the game on NBC, Berube just won a cup, Ortmeyer killed it in developing last year!! The playing career is taken with a grain of salt compared to office life....
I guess, first official NHL offseason move, but if you count the Rangers offseason as starting at the end of the regular season, they did trade for Adam FoxLol who would have thought our first offseason move is tanner glass
Keith Jones actually was a pretty decent player. Arguably as good as Milbury anyway. Jones also saved Eric Lindros's life by grabbing him off a plane he was about to fly on with a collapsed lung. Glass is a Dartmouth grad. He's not stupid.....and wherever he went he was well liked. When he first came to the Rangers Crosby was asking after him. But anyway there are lots of examples of players who had less than spectacular careers who did well in other hockey occupations. Glen Sather would be one. Peter Laviolette was a career minor leaguer whose NHL experience amounted to all of 12 games with the Rangers.
Other teams do this too. Most of the ex players are in ‘player development’ positions, which aren’t really anything special.I don't really care about this, but do other teams have all of these random ex-players around doing "stuff"? I feel like one of the things a lot of people around here say quite often is that in the cap era, a team like the Rangers should be taking advantage of their outsized budget by dominating in things like scouting and analytics. Instead, it seems like they use their extra cash to build out the old boys club with god knows what as the objective. I dunno.
I don't really care about this, but do other teams have all of these random ex-players around doing "stuff"? I feel like one of the things a lot of people around here say quite often is that in the cap era, a team like the Rangers should be taking advantage of their outsized budget by dominating in things like scouting and analytics. Instead, it seems like they use their extra cash to build out the old boys club with god knows what as the objective. I dunno.
This is what I said in the locked Roster Building thread:
"Guys who suck at playing hockey but make the NHL generally have to really figure out how the game works to get there. As bad as he was on the ice, I wouldn’t exactly use that as evidence against giving Glass a role within the organization"
If he's going to be one of these traveling 'development coaches,' I don't think they're suppose to be skills coaches, and everyone he's every played with or has been employed by really like him, so he seems like as good as a candidate as anyone to get prospects familiar with the organization and help them on their way
This guy should be traveling the world, teaching people how to get jobs they don't deserve