Sens of Anarchy
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2013
- 68,345
- 54,671
Miller sounds like a raging asshole, the kind you don't want to play against, and one I wouldn't want on my team that exists in the nation's capital.No. Bettman already addressed this Q, I think.
Allowing a team to trade for a late first round pick to pay for the loss of a pick demanded by the league would set a precedent for all teams to do that.
They lack "royal jelly". We need to make some trades to create a team that is "tough to play against". JT Miller seems like a guy who would be the type we need.
You may be right as he has been moved several times. However he does seem to be a player who calls out his team mates when they do not play well.Miller sounds like a raging asshole, the kind you don't want to play against, and one I wouldn't want on my team that exists in the nation's capital.
What does an "unprotected" pick have to do with making a decision to forfeit the 2025 versus the 2026 pick?You also have to factor in the risk that comes with going into next season with an unprotected pick. That’s a scary situation especially if they run into injury trouble.
I also selfishly don't want his... Personal opinions in the locker room as a CanadianYou may be right as he has been moved several times. However he does seem to be a player who calls out his team mates when they do not play well.
I don’t think that’s the biggest problem. We are 10th worst in the NHL Goals per game. 5 vs 5 scoring has been an issue. And when we lost one (or some) of our top producing forwards our scoring sags as we have seen recently. So depth that can create offense and points is definitely an issue. Tough guys that can’t score aren’t going to address this.They lack "royal jelly". We need to make some trades to create a team that is "tough to play against". JT Miller seems like a guy who would be the type we need.
When I said unprotected I just meant a pick that will be forfetied no matter what happens. So if we keep the 2025 pick the 2026 pick is unprotected which is really Risky because theres a chance it could be a top 10 pick.You may be right as he has been moved several times. However he does seem to be a player who calls out his team mates when they do not play well.
What does an "unprotected" pick have to do with making a decision to forfeit the 2025 versus the 2026 pick?
OK. In theory we should have a better team next season but that's theory.When I said unprotected I just meant a pick that will be forfetied no matter what happens. So if we keep the 2025 pick the 2026 pick is unprotected which is really Risky because theres a chance it could be a top 10 pick.
I think you are right; a top 6 winger or center is a major need. I also think we need to add team toughness.I don’t think that’s the biggest problem. We are 10th worst in the NHL Goals per game. 5 vs 5 scoring has been an issue. And when we lost one (or some) of our top producing forwards our scoring sags as we have seen recently. So depth that can create offense and points is definitely an issue. Tough guys that can’t score aren’t going to address this.
Most definitely the forward group is where the work needs to be done.Outside of Brady and Drake, this roster does not have legitimate wingers who drive play. And although the centre depth is fantastic, it's far from durable. This team's forwards are, today and into the future, its weakness.
Before the season I said the team is in a real tough spot and I think that's still true. Outside of Stutzle they don't have a single forward that drives play. Yes, that includes Brady. He looked extra beasty in the 4N because he had linemates that did. If someone else can put the opposition on their heels Brady can feast, but he needs that help.
He doesn't have it and neither does Stutzle.
I'm not sure what Staois should do at this point. He's filled in the depth/goalie adequately, but Batherson, Norris, Giroux, Pinto, Greig, Gaudette, Gregor, Amadio, Perron. Many of those guys offer something, but none of them carry play anymore.
The only possibility to change things up is making some creative hockey trades involving some of the above players. Pinto, Greig, Bath still have value.
We are basically entirely dependent on internal growth. If it goes well we could get there sooner but it’s basically like twiddling your thumbs and hoping for the best.I haven't watched the last 4 games. Maybe this means I'm tapping out. I don't know. When Benji said they won't spend to the cap next year because having no room to maneuver was extremely frustrating, it really hit home. Reading the trade proposel thread is like watching Ancient Aliens, fun for a bit because it's fantasy entertainment. This isn't a knock on people, everybody is just having fun, it does show how screwed we are though. Many are going on about Perron and Amadio....they are a symptom, not the cause. Pierre Dorion is a fck up. Combine the return for the players that were sold off at the start, piss poor trades for years after, wasted money when he was allowed to spend, shit drafting with the picks they did keep and one more first round pick walking out the door in the near future I find it stunning that anyone can say ....But Perron is bad and Staois blah blah. This team has to be 100% healthly and playing their best hockey to even be in the mix with 4-5 teams for a wildcard spot. This team can't have 1 or 2 guys have a bad night, let alone be hurt or it loses. Dorion built 1 line in 8 years....no defence, no goaletending, no prospects, no cap space. Nobody bring up Leevi, I see you coming, because that was a surprise...like Bobby Ryan back checking. Great to see, but don't plant your flag on that hill because you don't know if it will ever happen again. For those that say Dorion is in the past and move on, well the past in on the ice, it's a first rounder given away, it's no depth, it's no cap space, it's a mess. I get so angry watching games I want to chew my own face off. When they play well, the margin for error is so incredibly small, you know in your gut that it's not sustainable....even if hope skyrockets for a bit. Every thing has to go perfect to make the playoffs and nothing is perfect. The team isn't insulated to not be perfect. We have 2 or 3 more years until that happens. I don't think I've ever been this irritated in a post before. Thanks for letting me rant and keep up the hope. And Bruce can fck off. Slimy colaborator douche bag.
Team speed in the forwards also seems straight up bad.That's the result of not valuing drafting for high hockey IQ and vision over the past decade. You end up having a team with no quarterbacks on the ice.
I think there is still wriggle room to make some hockey trades, but it's going to be tough to pull off and improve.We are basically entirely dependent on internal growth. If it goes well we could get there sooner but it’s basically like twiddling your thumbs and hoping for the best.
Otherwise you’re right, it’s hard to see a path to fixing the depth and cap issues in the next year or even two.
If they won’t improve, is there a point?Team speed in the forwards also seems straight up bad.
I think there is still wriggle room to make some hockey trades, but it's going to be tough to pull off and improve.