- Jul 27, 2006
- 12,442
- 2,420
No. His development obviously wasn't hurt.You aren't sure why people are questioning why a player who showed he wasn't capable of keeping up at the NHL level in October wasn't sent to the AHL in October?
No. His development obviously wasn't hurt.You aren't sure why people are questioning why a player who showed he wasn't capable of keeping up at the NHL level in October wasn't sent to the AHL in October?
No. His development obviously wasn't hurt.
We don't know what was going on at practice. I'm sure there was a reason for keeping Tage up. I'm not complaining because of how he has responded once being sent down. Did he deserve to be up? No, not from what I know. These conversations were had all season. Not sure why people would be angry with him performing well.You seriously believe that he wouldn't be a better player today if he had gone down to the Amerks early in the season to work on his game? Heh. Wow.
We don't know what was going on at practice. I'm sure there was a reason for keeping Tage up. I'm not complaining because of how he has responded once being sent down. Did he deserve to be up? No, not from what I know. These conversations were had all season. Not sure why people would be angry with him performing well.
But at the same time we complain about others staying down too long?People aren't angry that he's performing well. They're angry that a player wasn't treated in the fashion that would have afforded him quality ice time, practice repetition, and situational use to grow -- the traditional route of minor league development in the NHL. We see him having some success and wonder at what might have been possible if he'd been working on the problems that plague his game at faster speeds and with less time.
But at the same time we complain about others staying down too long?
I don't think there is a specific way to develop a player. I don't know why they kept him up. Has anyone ever asked Botterill?
I agree with all your points but I don't know what Botterill's thought process was when making the decision to keep Tage up and others down. I would like to know.Right, players like Smith who went on multiple week runs of scoring were brought up and relegated to minimal minutes or the press box. The mantra from the front office of development and accountability is not born out in how they operate. Smith and O'Regan seemed to show enough to have deserved meaningful looks and instead we had Tage. Development is an art, but the basics of the medium are to reward good play with ice time at the next level. They did not do that.
I agree with all your points but I don't know what Botterill's thought process was when making the decision to keep Tage up and others down. I would like to know.
I agree with all your points but I don't know what Botterill's thought process was when making the decision to keep Tage up and others down. I would like to know.
I mean, sure... as fans (particularly jaded ones with the occasional axe to grind) that may be the only reason that makes sense. Who knows really.The only reason that makes sense to see him up all year was that he was a big piece of the O'Reilly trade and that... that points to bigger problems at the top.
that was my exact question actually. That team could look extremely different next year, with significantly reduced forward talent
I made a post in the Amerks thread regarding this very topic. Essentially, most of their scoring talent will probably be in Buffalo next season. Tage may start in Rochester but he won't stay the whole season I'd think. Any new scoring talent would be coming in from free agency or some new kids, none of whom I'd expect to make a huge scoring impact out of the gate.
I mean, sure... as fans (particularly jaded ones with the occasional axe to grind) that may be the only reason that makes sense. Who knows really.
Tage and Nylander earned spots coming out of camp/preseason IMO. Moreso than Smith, Olofsson, O'Regan, Asplund, etc. Given Nylanders benching in the AHL playoffs the prior year and the fact everyone seemed to point to attitude/effort as the reason, one good camp may not have been enough to convince the organization on him. So Thompson got the spot.
As such, I have a feeling Thompson is a confident kid. Takes his struggles and losses on the chin, with a good attitude and does (or tries to do) what his coaches tell him. Not to mention he's a talented hockey player that really needs to work on his decision making at the NHL level. I'm sure they saw that in him, didn't see his struggles this season as detrimental as the extended look in the NHL was beneficial.
Keeping him in the NHL all year may not have been the best decision, but I don't see how it's a horrible one. If sending him down would've been moreso to boost his confidence, I'm not sure that was needed. Tage is doing fine for being a project.
I think people want it to be a crippling decision for the sake of being "the icing on the cake" for this trade very badly for odd personal reasons. It doesn't all have to go back to the trade... but I get why fans here think it should/want it to.
Saying the only reason that makes sense is Botteril desperately trying to justify the trade/his job by keeping Tage up, is the "axe to grind". Occam's Razor, the simplest answer is that they felt Tage had the most to gain by learning in the NHL.Pointing out that there isn't much hockey-related that kept him up on the team or that getting practice and in-game reps at the minor league level, which is a proven method of improving someone's game is... "having an axe to grind"?
I never got the sense of "evident frustration" in Tage's game. At least no more so than any other player this year. We already knew Tage can play at the AHL level, he needs to learn the NHL. Like I said, I don't think confidence is necessarily an issue with him. Everything I've seen, the kid has a good attitude. I don't think the team saw a need to send him to Rochester to fix his shattered psyche.The point that he kept the spot even though he was not good at what he was doing in the lineup was the issue of the post. Hearing Botterill lament that he would have liked to have seen players like O'Regan or Smith in bigger roles in Buffalo was particularly frustrating since both went on solid runs in Rochester that are easy to reference as a merit recall for such a look. The opportunity to make internal roster moves and take a moment for evaluation was again lost. That's a bad look, especially when the guy who can make those decisions comments on it like he had no power in the situation.
Given the team's comments about doing thing "the right way" and internal competition, looks odd in light of the free pass his terrible play was given. If they'd sent him down when he was sitting out games and he went on even a fraction of the pace he did to end the season with the Amerks, the overwhelming demand from the fans would be to have him back up and in the lineup. They didn't send him down and left him to building frustration which was evident in his play. That certainly doesn't seem like the best environment to develop a key prospect.
The crippling (but not really) decision of leaving Tage up this year.Which crippling decision are you talking about? Most fans want to salvage what they can from the trade, for them to make the efforts to turn out the best results for Tage and the picks. There is no need to justify the terrible nature of the trade with any icing on the proverbial cake, it was the most lopsided trades this team has made since Dom left.
Saying the only reason that makes sense is Botteril desperately trying to justify the trade/his job by keeping Tage up, is the "axe to grind". Occam's Razor, the simplest answer is that they felt Tage had the most to gain by learning in the NHL.
I never got the sense "evident frustration" in Tage's game. At least no more so than any other player this year. We already knew Tage can play at the AHL level, he needs to learn the NHL. Like I said, I don't think confidence is necessarily an issue with him. Everything I've seen, the kid has a good attitude. I don't think the team saw a need to send him to Rochester to fix his shattered psyche.
Whether that's in contradiction to something they've said before in regards to earning spots or open competition or whatever... I dunno. I'm sure they'll do whatever they feel is best for a player, especially a key prospect like Tage, versus going through every interview/presser the last two years prior to making/not making roster moves to ensure they don't contradict themselves in the fans eyes.
The crippling (but not really) decision of leaving Tage up this year.
"Most fans" do, sure. "Most fans on HF" want the trade to be such a visibly appalling failure that Botteril gets fired tomorrow. And the fact that Botteril isn't going to be fired tomorrow just means another layer of icing needs to be added.
I never got the sense of "evident frustration" in Tage's game. At least no more so than any other player this year. We already knew Tage can play at the AHL level, he needs to learn the NHL. Like I said, I don't think confidence is necessarily an issue with him. Everything I've seen, the kid has a good attitude. I don't think the team saw a need to send him to Rochester to fix his shattered psyche.
Agreed, unless Oregan criscuolo porter leier are coming back, that forward core is going to be a crater
Here's the thing: by keeping him up and force feeding him into the lineup to be wrecked and embarrassed on a nightly basis all that was acomplished was making our whole fanbase see him as a flop, and he's going to have to work to get rid of that taint. If the minute they saw he couldn't cut it at this level they sent him to Rochester and he had a great season the way he would be viewed right now would be a complete 180. Botts did him no favors by keeping him in Buffalo.Saying the only reason that makes sense is Botteril desperately trying to justify the trade/his job by keeping Tage up, is the "axe to grind". Occam's Razor, the simplest answer is that they felt Tage had the most to gain by learning in the NHL.
I never got the sense of "evident frustration" in Tage's game. At least no more so than any other player this year. We already knew Tage can play at the AHL level, he needs to learn the NHL. Like I said, I don't think confidence is necessarily an issue with him. Everything I've seen, the kid has a good attitude. I don't think the team saw a need to send him to Rochester to fix his shattered psyche.
Whether that's in contradiction to something they've said before in regards to earning spots or open competition or whatever... I dunno. I'm sure they'll do whatever they feel is best for a player, especially a key prospect like Tage, versus going through every interview/presser the last two years prior to making/not making roster moves to ensure they don't contradict themselves in the fans eyes.
The crippling (but not really) decision of leaving Tage up this year.
"Most fans" do, sure. "Most fans on HF" want the trade to be such a visibly appalling failure that Botteril gets fired tomorrow. And the fact that Botteril isn't going to be fired tomorrow just means another layer of icing needs to be added.
I suppose I would consider that "playing" at the AHL level.I would love to know what you meant by this.
Prior to this season, Thompson had 9 goals and 20 points in 46 regular season AHL games and 2 goals and 3 points in 10 AHL playoff games.
Those numbers are on par with what Alex Nylander had put up in the AHL entering this season and I doubt that too many people would have felt comfortable with how Nylander had played in the AHL to that point.
I think you're holding your opinions, or even that of HF posters, in a little too high of regard. He probably (hopefully) never really see's what we say. From the perspective of confidence, as long as he didn't feel wrecked or embarrassed, and is/was working to get better, and the coaching staff is/was working with him... that's what matters.Here's the thing: by keeping him up and force feeding him into the lineup to be wrecked and embarrassed on a nightly basis all that was acomplished was making our whole fanbase see him as a flop, and he's going to have to work to get rid of that taint. If the minute they saw he couldn't cut it at this level they sent him to Rochester and he had a great season the way he would be viewed right now would be a complete 180. Botts did him no favors by keeping him in Buffalo.
I suppose I would consider that "playing" at the AHL level.
And I don't think people have a *ton* of issue with Nylander's production, especially for his age. The effort/attitude was always the bigger question mark. Exemplified by him getting benched in the playoffs last year.