Swedens future

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.

erikhamren

DWDWw
May 7, 2021
642
365
Sweden
Many of our drafted NHL prospects doesnt become anything special in the NHL, and many wont touch NHL ice once in their career. Since the 2020 draft, only three Swedes has establish themselves as top talents/players. Raymond, Eklund and Carlsson. THREE out of like 100ish? Sure you can argue that its too early to talk about the top 2022 and 23 draft prospects but its not like that they look to become ppg players in the NHL which we clearly needs.

Our federation needs to aim at USA and Canada, we are so behind them at youth level its insane
 
Those numbers are pretty standard for not just Sweden but USA as well. USA has 5 players who have established themselves as top players in that span, they have players looking to become top players as well, but as are we.

Players from that span who look really promising but just need more time: Edvinsson, Wallstedt, Lindbom, Unger Sörum, Djurgården trio, Willander, ASP, Salomonsson, & Lindstein. Some will bust, but it's not like there's no depth to pick up the slack.
 
Those numbers are pretty standard for not just Sweden but USA as well. USA has 5 players who have established themselves as top players in that span, they have players looking to become top players as well, but as are we.

Players from that span who look really promising but just need more time: Edvinsson, Wallstedt, Lindbom, Unger Sörum, Djurgården trio, Willander, ASP, Salomonsson, & Lindstein. Some will bust, but it's not like there's no depth to pick up the slack.

Thats true. I was too harsh maybe when i made this thread, but i still think work on our development program can be done but i am in no position to talk about that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockeyfrilla
The NHL scouting process risks missing out on some of Sweden’s brightest hockey talents by focusing too heavily on players selected for high-profile tournaments like the World Junior Championships. While these events showcase impressive skill, they often favor players who are physically early-developers.

This narrow approach overlooks late bloomers—players with extraordinary potential who might not fit the traditional mold at a young age. Hockey is a game of creativity, intelligence, and skill, and some of the greatest talents develop these attributes over time.

By putting too much emphasis on early physical development, the sport risks losing the artistry and brilliance that late-developing players could bring. It’s time to broaden the scouting lens to ensure we don’t miss the next generation of truly exceptional players.
 
Your analysis is completely accurate. I follow several young players who have significantly more talent than many in todays junior national team or those who have been promoted to older age groups and senior teams. The risk is that these players will give up, feeling that their chance has passed.

Clubs and national team management have a great responsibility here. Hävelid the only one breaking the pattern by bringing in players who have never been part of any national team before. The U18 national team, with only 30 players this year and just two underaged players, has barely introduced any new players, which is completely unacceptable.

We will see the consequences of this. It is already spreading that if you not play up in older age groups and make your senior team debut, you are done.

We are promoting early-maturing players who miss out on fundamental hockey skills, leading to a loss of true talent.
 

Ad

Ad